The Defense of Cuba

Published in La Jornada
(Mexico) on 20 July 2021
by José Blanco (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nick Boline. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The protest that occurred on July 11 in Cuba was the largest since 1994, when the Maleconazo uprising, which was limited to a few people in the center of Havana and lasted only a few days, initiated the flight of the “boat people.” This time, the unrest was larger and more diverse. All at once, the right and ultra-right-wing politicians of the world spoke out against the communist dictatorship, without mentioning the sentiment or the vote of countries around the world, which once again passed a resolution expressing their support for ending the heinous U.S. economic blockade. As has been the case since 1992, there were only a few votes against the resolution.

Those votes came from the U.S., the author of Cuban suffering, and the fascist regime in Israel, joined now by the Uribista neophyte Iván Duque Marquez (from Colombia), comedian Volodymyr Zelenskiy (from Ukraine) and the idiot Jair Bolsonaro (Brazil), who abstained from voting in the face of the political butchery of a country that refused to bow down before the American empire. And as usual, Luis Almagro and his kindred spirit, Michelle Bachelet, kowtowed to America.

Reports by David Brooks show how the gringo vote in the U.N. has become more and more subject to the sentiment of the gringo-Cubans in Miami. This chorus of detestable anti-Cuban Cubans could be heard immediately on social media. The chorus included the Miami Mayor Francis Suarez, who tweeted that the people are desperate because there has ben no gringo intervention yet. He asked for military action such as bombing Cuba, recalling the barbarous U.S. attack against Panama. For the U.S. government, the Florida vote is more important than the lives of 11.3 million Cubans.

In general, the gringo-Cubans have been zealots for the Republican Party, because the Republicans believe, despite all evidence, that the blockade will cause the overthrow of the Cuban regime. At the same time, the gringo-Cubans believe that the blockade will continue to drive emigration from Cuba to Miami, weakening the Cuban regime.

Although the world is changing, it is becoming increasingly more doubtful that Florida actually voted for Donald Trump, without saying too much more than that. Miami-Dade County, with a population of 2.5 million, voted Democratic in previous elections. On the other hand, there does not yet exist any consensus in the U.S. on the blockade. Within 48 hours of the protests in Cuba, the number of Democrats urgently calling for the modification or cancellation of the measures imposed by Trump to strangle the island multiplied. Either way, we need to pay attention: Trump is regaining ground.

The vast majority of Cubans who participated in the protests are not agents of the American empire, nor are they co-conspirators in the kind of sinister plots the U.S. has orchestrated around the world. Every protester seems genuinely aggrieved in his or her own way by the shortages of food, medicine, electricity and other basic necessities, shortages that ignited the unrest. But we cannot rule out the scheming machinations of the gringos, nor of the Cubans who have enabled and promoted the cruel and inhumane blockade imposed by the U.S. government.

Cuba has much political and economic work to do among the sectors of the population that participated in the protests, and among the emigrantCubans and their descendants in Florida (and other states) who voted for the Democratic Party. Recent emigrants look favorably at Bernie Sanders. Furthermore, Cuba should enact a policy combating anti-Cuban propaganda on social media. Under current conditions, Cuba lacks the support of the rest of the world.

After 20 years, the U.S. is pulling out of Afghanistan, and there are only 2,500 U.S. troops left in Iraq. But insurgencies continue in both countries. In both the Iranian and Afghan conflicts, Washington had hoped that the imposition of democratic reform would protect the population, win their hearts and minds,”and destroy the insurgency. This has not happened, the way the 2006 U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual that guided both campaigns said it would. The U.S. efforts in these countries have been an unmitigated failure.

In Cuba, the U.S. will not find an insurgency that is easily controlled. This insurgency against the state has been going on for 60 years, since it toppled dictator Fulgencio Batista. The U.S. lacks a field manual for toppling a government born of a progressive revolution that has historically had broad popular support. When Biden said, “We stand with the Cuban people and their clarion call for freedom and relief from the tragic grip of the pandemic and from the decades of repression and economic suffering to which they have been subjected,” he showed that he either knows nothing about the Cuban people, or that he’s kidding himself.

If there ever were an attempt to invade the island, the overwhelming majority of the Cuban people would organize into a people’s army to defend their country, not to mention the fact that innumerable Latin Americans would also take up arms to defend it. Aside from the obvious differences in distance, if the U.S. invaded Cuba, it would have about the same luck it had in Vietnam.






La protesta del pasado domingo 11 de julio en Cuba fue la más exigente desde 1994, cuando el maleconazo, que se limitó al centro de La Habana, a pocas personas, duró un par de días y produjo la salida de los “balseros”. Esta vez la disconformidad fue mayor y diversa. Todos a una las derechas y ultraderechas del mundo alzaron la voz contra la “dictadura comunista”, sin referencia a la voz y el voto de los países del mundo que en la ONU volvieron a expresarse en favor de abolir el abyecto bloqueo económico de Estados Unidos. Como ocurre desde 1992, ese ejercicio tuvo el voto en contra de EU, autor del sufrimiento de los cubanos, y el del régimen facha de Israel, acompañados ahora del neófito uribista Iván Duque (Colombia), del actor comediante Volodímir Zelenski (Ucrania) y del alcornoque Jair Bolsonaro (Brasil), que se “abstuvieron” frente a la carnicera política de EU sobre un país que no agacha la cerviz ante el imperio. Como sí la agachó, ipso facto, como siempre, Luis Almagro y su alma gemela Michelle Bachelet.

Los episodios narrados por David Brooks muestran cómo el voto gringo en la ONU está cada vez más condicionado por la postura de los cubano-gringos de Miami. El coro de estos lamentables “cubanos” anticubanos pobló de inmediato las redes sociales, incluido el alcalde de Miami, Francis Suárez, quien dijo en Twitter que “la gente” está desesperada porque la intervención gringa no llega; pidió una acción militar con ataques aéreos contra Cuba, repitiendo la acción bárbara de EU en Panamá. Para el gobierno de EU importa el voto de Florida, no la vida de los 11.3 millones del pueblo de Cuba.

En general, los cubano-gringos han sido adictos fervientes del Partido Republicano, porque este partido cree, contra la evidencia, que el bloqueo acabará con el régimen; a su vez, los cubano-gringos creen que el bloqueo continuará impulsando la emigración cubana hacia Miami, erosionando así al régimen cubano. Aunque el mundo cambia: es cada vez más dudoso que Florida votó Trump, sans phrases; en el condado de Miami Dade, con 2.5 millones de habitantes, ganó el Partido Demócrata (PD) en las pasadas elecciones. De otra parte, ya no existe en EU el consenso histórico sobre el bloqueo. En al menos las 48 horas siguientes a las protestas cubanas se multiplicó el número de legisladores demócratas que expresaron la urgencia de modificar o anular las medidas impulsadas por Trump para asfixiar a la isla. Aunque, es necesario poner atención: Trump está recuperando terreno.

La mayoría de los cubanos que protestaron no son agentes del imperio, ni personas que actuaron siguiendo alguna trama tenebrosa de las muchas que ha emprendido EU por el mundo. Cada uno parece agobiado, de modos distintos, por la escasez de alimentos, de medicamentos, electricidad y otros productos básicos, lo que operó como detonante de las protestas, sin descartar los caminos retorcidos de gringos y cubanos que habrían operado en un medio propicio o, por mejor decir, propiciado por el atroz, cruelmente deshumanizado, bloqueo del gobierno de EU.

Cuba tiene un arduo trabajo político y económico que desplegar entre la poblaciones desde las cuales surgió la protesta, y entre los cubanos emigrantes y sus descendientes que en Florida y otros estados votan por el PD; nuevos emigrantes simpatizan con Bernie Sanders. Debe, además, crear una política contra la propaganda anticubana en las redes sociales. En las condiciones actuales, a Cuba también le falta solidaridad del mundo.

Después de 20 años, EU está dejando Afganistán; y en Irak sólo quedan 2 mil 500 soldados estadunidenses. Pero en ambos países las insurgencias continúan. De ambas guerras, Washington esperaba que la imposición de reformas “democráticas”, “protegiera” a la población, “ganara corazones y mentes” y derrotara a la insurgencia. Eso no ha sucedido, como lo pedía el Manual de Campo de la Contrainsurgencia del Ejército y el Cuerpo de Marines de Estados Unidos, publicado en 2006, que pretendía guiar las campañas en ambos países. El de EU ha sido ahí un rotundo fracaso.

En Cuba, EU no hallará una insurgencia que meter en cintura. La insurgencia fue contra el Estado de hace 60 años y derrotó a la, esa sí, dictadura de Fulgencio Batista. EU carece de un manual para derrocar un gobierno constituido mediante una revolución progresista que ha contado históricamente con un vasto consenso. Cuando Biden declaró: “Estamos con el pueblo cubano y su clarificador llamado a la libertad y al alivio de las trágicas garras de la pandemia y de las décadas de represión y sufrimiento económico al que han sido sometidos…”, o no sabe nada del pueblo cubano o se hace el occiso. La mayor parte del pueblo de Cuba, ante cualquier intento de invadir la isla, se convertiría en un ejército popular en defensa de su país, sin contar los innumerables brazos latinoamericanos que se sumarían a la defensa de la isla. Guardadas las obvias distancias, en una invasión a Cuba, EU correría la suerte que corrió en ­Vietnam.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Afghanistan: Defeat? Strategic Withdrawal? Maneuver?

India: Greenland: How To Handle America That Wants Everything

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal