Has American Nuclear Policy Abandoned the NPT?

Published in Shinmai
(Japan) on 4 April 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Joseph Santiago. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
The Non-Proliferation Treaty has bound its signers of America, Russia and all other nuclear powers to faithfully work toward lowering their stockpiles of nuclear weapons. However, we’ve reached the point where these countries may dare to go back on their pledges and cause a collapse of the NPT system.

In a summary of the Nuclear Posture Review made public by the American government, it was stressed that the U.S. would use a “nuclear umbrella” that includes its allies as a deterrent, while not necessarily adhering to the policy of using nuclear arms as strictly a preventative measure. This will be the first NPR of President Joe Biden's administration. Before he came to office, the president asserted that the sole purpose of nuclear weapons should be as a deterrent, but he seems to have taken his allies’ worries of the growing nuclear threats of Russia and China into consideration. It was rumored that the NPR would include a pledge to not use arms preemptively, but that idea has died out. It appears that the current administration hasn’t inherited the position of Barack Obama on a nuclear-free world.

Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirokazu Matsuno has expressed strong support for this latest NPR. The Japanese government has opposed the policy of abstaining from preemptive strikes for some time now, as it left doubt as to if America would uphold the security pact between the two countries. However, what right do we have to lay claim as victims of nuclear weapons if we don’t try to limit their usage?

America’s nuclear policy has been designed with Russia and China’s efforts to strengthen their nuclear capabilities in mind. Russia, in the midst of its invasion of Ukraine, hasn’t shied away from threatening nuclear force and causing mass anxiety the world over in one fell swoop. These unlawful acts by a nuclear power only invite the risk of nuclear war. This is why we, as the international community, must be unflagging in the pursuit of totally abolishing nuclear weapons by placing all the more pressure on those who possess them.

Nuclear weapons must never be used again, and the only way to ensure that is their total elimination. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which partially came to fruition due to the appeals of atomic bomb victims from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is growing in importance as the world begins to face the possible reality of nuclear war.

Far from creating an agreement to not only abolish the possession and use of nuclear arms, but also any type of intimidation using them, the nuclear powers of the world seem to have turned their backs on the NPT and the idea of giving up their weapons. Never was this more evident than at a review conference for the NPT, where many of them treated nuclear disposal as a buzzword, while still officially agreeing to it. The framework for American and Russian nuclear disposal is collapsing as negotiations with China become untenable. If the nuclear powers are bent on dismantling the NPT, it’s up to the Japanese government to take real action to move the world toward nuclear disarmament.


〈社説〉米国の核戦略 廃絶の責務 置き去りにか

核拡散防止条約(NPT)は米国やロシアをはじめ核保有国に、核軍縮を誠実に進める義務を課してきた。その責務が置き去りにされ、NPT体制が土台から崩れかねない状況だ。

 米政府が概要を公表した「核体制の見直し(NPR)」は、同盟国への「核の傘」による拡大抑止の維持を最優先事項とし、従来の核政策を踏襲した。核攻撃の阻止や反撃に役割を限定する「唯一の目的」の宣言は見送った。

 バイデン政権下で初のNPRである。大統領に就く前から「唯一の目的」化を公言していたバイデン氏だが、抑止力の低下を懸念する同盟国に配慮したという。

 相手国より先に核兵器を使わない「先制不使用」の宣言も取りざたされたが、立ち消えた。オバマ政権から受け継ぐとした「核なき世界」への展望は見えない。

 松野博一官房長官は今回のNPRを強く支持すると述べている。政府はかねて、日本の安全保障に十全を期せないとして先制不使用の宣言に反対してきた。核の力を弱めまいとする姿勢は、被爆国の責任をなげうつに等しい。

 米国の核戦略の背景にあるのは新型兵器の開発を進め、核戦力を増強するロシアや中国の動きだ。ウクライナに侵攻したロシアは、核の使用をちらつかせて威嚇し、脅威の水準を一気に高めた。

 核大国の無法な振る舞いが、核で対抗する動きを生み、実際に使われる危険を招き寄せている。であればこそ、国際社会は核廃絶に向けた努力を滞らせるわけにいかない。保有国に廃絶への取り組みを一層強く迫る必要がある。

 核兵器は二度と使われてはならない。それを保証する唯一の方法は完全な廃絶だ―。広島、長崎の被爆者たちの訴えが結実した核兵器禁止条約は、核戦争の危機に直面する世界の現実を前に、さらに重みを増している。

 保有や使用だけでなく、核による威嚇を含めた一切を禁止する条約を、保有国は、NPT体制を損ない、核廃絶をかえって遠ざけると批判し、背を向けた。その姿勢が厳しく問われる。

 NPTの履行状況を確かめる再検討会議で、保有国は完全廃棄の「明確な約束」に合意しながら、たなざらしにしてきた。米ロの核軍縮の枠組みは細り、中国を加えた交渉の場もできていない。

 NPTを崩壊の危機にさらしているのは保有国だ。その現実を直視し、廃絶に向けた具体的な行動を取るよう働きかけることこそ日本政府が果たすべき役割だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?