US Soldiers Who Commit Sexual Crimes Should Be Handed Over to Japanese Law Enforcement

Published in Ryukyu Shimpo
(Japan) on 21 April 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dani Long. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Another heinous crime has been committed by a U.S. soldier. In December 2021, the Naha District Public Prosecutor’s Office indicted Jordan Begaye of the U.S. Marine Corps for injuring a woman in an attempt to sexually assault her the past October.

This year marks the 50th anniversary of Okinawa prefecture returning to Japanese control. Although the prefectural government advocates for preventative measures and enforcement of disciplinary measures every time there is an incident, these heinous crimes continue to be committed. The underlying problem is the structure of the U.S. military. Sexual crimes violate the victim's human rights and are considered a “murder of the soul.” These despicable and atrocious crimes absolutely cannot be allowed.

In the event of such crimes, if the U.S. recognizes a crime has been committed, military personnel can be handed over to Japanese law enforcement prior to indictment. However, in this case, Begaye was released to Okinawan police after indictment. Because the crime occurred outside of U.S. military facilities, the Japanese government should be the ones to detain the accused and investigate the case. The Japanese government should demand a revision of the Status of Forces Agreement to mandate pre-indictment surrender for all crimes.

Sex-related crimes by military personnel have been occurring one after another within the prefecture since last year. The perpetrators are emboldened by the knowledge that they are protected under the Status of Forces Agreement, which grants privileges to the U.S. military.

According to Article 17 of the U.S.-Japan Status of Forces Agreement, if U.S. military personnel or civilian employees of the military commit a crime that is not related to their official duties, they will remain with the U.S. until the Japanese government prosecutes the offense.

The Status of Forces Agreement was “improved” in the wake of the 1995 Okinawa rape incident. The U.S. has agreed to “give sympathetic consideration” regarding the transfer of the accused before prosecution only for “murder, rape, and other serious cases.” However, this is not enforceable; there have been cases where the U.S. refused to hand over military personnel accused of such crimes without giving a clear reason.

Regarding the case from October 2021, according to investigators, the U.S. military detained Lance Corporal Jordan Begaye on the base after the investigation by the prefectural police's iidentified him. The defendant was under the supervision of the U.S. military and underwent multiple interrogations in response to appearance requests from the prefectural police. This is likely the result of information sharing and cooperation between the prefectural police and the U.S. military, but because of the Status of Forces Agreement’s improvement, Japanese law enforcement should be able to demand custody of the accused prior to indictment.

Why do sex-related crimes continue to happen? The Ryukyu Okinawa branch of the Veterans for Peace, established by retired U.S. military personnel, issued a statement in the wake of an incident in 2016, in which a 20-year-old Japanese woman was raped and murdered by a U.S. civilian employee of the military. The statement claims in its analysis that “military education and enforcement of discipline” is in a predicament.* The army cannot fight on the actual battlefield with "good neighbor" training alone, but there is also informal education on how to be an effective murderer.

Experts point out that the Marine Corps troops are trained to look down on women in order to promote masculine aggression, and consequently lose their balance as human beings. As long as this army remains, these crimes will be repeated.

On the other hand, there is the question of why the case was kept private by the prefectural government. Although victim protection is understandable, it is a fact that a heinous crime has occurred. There needs to be a convincing explanation for such secrecy.

*Editor's Note: This quotation, accurately translated, could not be verified.


またしても米兵による凶悪犯罪が発生した。2021年10月、女性に性的暴行を加えようとしてけがを負わせたとして、那覇地検が同年12月に米海兵隊上等兵ジョーダン・ビゲイ被告を強制性交等致傷罪で起訴していた。

今年は沖縄の施政権返還(日本復帰)から50年を迎える。事件のたびに再発防止や綱紀粛正を唱えるが、復帰後も凶悪犯罪が繰り返される。軍隊の抱える構造的な問題が横たわる。性犯罪は被害者の人権を蹂躙し「魂の殺人」と呼ばれる。卑劣で凶悪な犯罪は断じて許されない。

凶悪犯罪の場合、米側が認めれば起訴前に米兵の身柄を日本側に引き渡せる。だが、今回の事件の身柄引き渡しは起訴後だった。犯罪は米軍施設の外で起きた。日本側が起訴前に身柄を拘束して捜査すべきだ。日本政府は全ての犯罪について起訴前の身柄引き渡しを義務付けるよう、地位協定の見直しを求めるべきだ。

県内では昨年から米軍関係者による性犯罪が相次いでいる。米軍に特権を与えている地位協定で守られているという意識が事件・事故を助長してきたと指摘されてきた。

日米地位協定17条によって、米軍人・軍属による公務外の犯罪で、容疑者の身柄が米側にあるときは、日本側が起訴するまで米側が拘束する。

1995年の少女乱暴事件を契機に地位協定の「運用改善」がなされた。「殺人、強姦という凶悪な犯罪」に限り、起訴前の身柄引き渡しについて米側が「好意的な考慮を払う」ことで合意した。しかし、強制力はなく、米側が明確な理由を示さないまま身柄引き渡しを拒否した例もある。

 捜査関係者によると、県警の捜査でビゲイ被告の犯行と特定し、米軍が基地内で同被告を拘束したという。被告は米軍の監視下にあり、県警の出頭要請に応じる形で複数回にわたって取り調べを進めた。県警と米軍の情報共有や協力の結果だろうが、地位協定の運用が改善されたのだから、起訴前に日本側が身柄を要求すべきだ。

なぜ性犯罪が繰り返されるのか。2016年の米軍属女性暴行殺人事件に際し、米国の退役米軍人でつくる「ベテランズ・フォー・ピース(VFP)」琉球沖縄支部が声明を発表したことがある。VFPは「軍人教育と綱紀粛正」がジレンマを抱えているからだと分析する。軍隊は「良き隣人」訓練だけでは、実際の戦場で戦うことができない。そこで効果的な殺人者となる非公式な教育も受けている。

 専門家は海兵隊では男性的な攻撃性を突出するために、徹底的に女性を蔑視する非人間的な訓練が行われ、人間としてのバランスを失っていくと指摘する。軍隊が存在する限り犯罪は繰り返される。


 一方、被害者保護は理解できるが、凶悪犯罪が発生したことは事実である。非公表とする理由は何か。納得のいく説明が必要だ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Japan: Partial Cease-fire: Avoid Putin’s Pace