Biden’s Landmark Climate Bill Creates Fear in the EU

Published in Danmarks Radio/ DR.DK
(Denmark) on 15 December 2022
by Per Bang Thomsen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sheila D'Souza. Edited by Patricia Simoni.

 

 

The EU must discuss what they can do today to defend itself against the new American stimulus package aimed at the green economy.

It seems a little paradoxical.

European countries have for years sought a more proactive stance from the U.S. when it comes to climate change — even more than when former President Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Agreement because he did not believe in man-made climate change.

But late this summer when President Joe Biden managed to pass an enormous stimulus package that will direct $369 billion toward the American green economy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% before the end of the decade, he was met with howls of outrage from several European capitals.

The billions of dollars in the Inflation Reduction Act are earmarked for companies based in the U.S. In addition, the act requires the purchase of American products to strengthen domestic industry.

But according to several European countries, this is a toxic cocktail of unfair subsidies and discriminatory protectionism of the highest order. And many fear that the package will eventually erode the foundations of Europe's renewable energy sector, which will not receive the same financial support.

But how should the EU then react to this bill? This is the question that the heads of state and government will today face at their summit in Brussels.

France Wants To Relax the Rules

Although EU member states are pleased that the climate fight is now getting a boost on the other side of the Atlantic, they are at the same time worried about this “green energy competition” that has now been launched.

However, EU countries are far from agreement on what concrete action they can take to deal with this legislative package, which could become a serious threat to their solar cell companies, electric car manufacturers, wind turbine manufacturers and developers of green hydrogen.

Many are already talking about the fact that the EU countries, which for years have been leaders in the green economy, should change their industrial policy to be able to take a stronger stance against competitors.

This includes France, where President Emmanuel Macron has long pushed to relax the current state subsidy and competition rules to make it easier for member states to give their companies a helping financial hand. And he would like to see a “Buy European” response to Biden’s climate bill.

“We must respond urgently. We must strengthen our industrial base and we have to remain competitive,” President Macron said this morning as he arrived at the summit.

Fears of a Race to the Bottom

EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen also believes there is a need to rethink the way EU countries can help their companies through the green transition. There is, according to von der Leyen, a strong risk that the American subsidies will lead to unfair competition—not least for European electric car producers.

The concern is that their American competitors stand to receive a significant boost through new tax credits of up to about $7,000 for Americans who buy domestically produced electric cars.

“It should be a race to the top, not the bottom,” Ursula von der Leyen said yesterday.

She is recommending among other things that the EU adjust its subsidy rules to make it easier and faster for member states to support the transition to a green economy.

In addition, the commission president suggests that EU countries look at whether there is a need for more public investment in the fight against climate change, for example, through a new shared “sovereignty fund,” which would, among other things, be targeted toward research into clean energy innovation and thereby strengthen Europe, particularly vis-a-vis the U.S.and China.

It is unclear how the fund would be financed, but several countries have already given a thumbs down to more shared loans on the part of the member states as was common during the pandemic.

“It’s worth looking at how we can use the funds that were created for the previous crisis to kickstart the economy during the current crises,” German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said yesterday.

No Desire for a Trade War

A number of EU countries are also reluctant to change the common industrial policy right now. One of the concerns is that it would create internal competition favoring the countries with the deepest pockets. Germany faced harsh criticism earlier in the year from several countries, including Italy and Hungary, after having passed a massive stimulus plan aimed at supporting German industry through the current economic crisis.

Denmark, which has for years been a strong proponent of free trade, is also not keen to see a more protectionist EU.

There are already concerns that the new American stimulus package will lead to a trans-Atlantic trade war. There is little desire for that in Europe right now, and EU states are therefore hoping for an amicable solution with the Americans.

Earlier this month, President Biden said that “tweaks” can be made so that European companies also are more likely to benefit from the new bill. But he has no intention of changing the bill itself, which will become law in 2023.

Because — aside from the transition to clean energy — this bill is also about making the U.S. less reliant on China, and that is not something that concerns from the EU will change. They must figure this out on their own, and no one expects an answer to be found today.










Bidens kæmpe klimapakke skaber frygt blandt EU-landene. Men de er ikke enige om, hvad modsvaret skal være
EU-landene skal i dag diskutere, hvad de skal gøre for at forsvare sig mod amerikanernes nye hjælpepakke til den grønne sektor.


Det kan virke lidt paradoksalt.


I årevis efterlyste de europæiske lande mere klimahandling fra USA’s side. Ikke mindst under den forrige præsident, Donald Trump, som ligefrem trak amerikanerne ud af Paris-aftalen, fordi han ikke troede på de menneskeskabte klimaforandringer.
Men da præsident Joe Biden i sensommeren fik vedtaget en enorm lovpakke, der skal pumpe 2.635 milliarder kroner ud i USA’s grønne sektor og sænke landets drivhusgas-udledninger med 40 procent inden årtiet er omme, blev den mødt med vrede protester fra en række europæiske hovedstæder.
Milliarderne i den såkaldte ’Inflation Reduction Act’ er nemlig øremærket virksomheder, der holder til i USA. Derudover er der krav om, at der skal købes amerikansk for på den måde at styrke den hjemlige industri.
Men ifølge flere europæiske lande er det en giftig cocktail af unfair statsstøtte og diskriminerende protektionisme af allerværste grad. Og flere frygter, at pakken på sigt vil fjerne fundamentet under Europas vedvarende energisektor, som ikke får den samme økonomiske støtte.
Men hvordan skal EU-landene så reagere på pakken? Det er spørgsmålet, som stats- og regeringscheferne i dag skal vende på deres topmøde i Bruxelles.

Frankrig ønsker lempede regler
Selvom de er glade for, at klimakampen nu får et rygstød på den anden side af Atlanten, er de samtidig stærkt bekymret for dette grønne kapløb, der nu er blevet skudt i gang.

Men EU-landene er dog langt fra enige om, hvad de mere konkret skal gøre for at håndtere lovpakken, som kan blive en alvorlig trussel for deres solcellevirksomheder, elbilfabrikanter, vindmølleproducenter og udviklere af grøn brint.
Flere taler allerede om, at EU-landene, som i årevis har været førende på det grønne område, bør ændre deres industripolitik for på den måde at kunne stå stærkere over for konkurrenterne.
Det gælder ikke mindst Frankrig, hvor præsident Emmanuel Macron længe har presset på for at lempe de nuværende statsstøtte- og konkurrenceregler, så det bliver lettere for medlemslandene at give deres virksomheder en hjælpende økonomisk hånd. Og han ser gerne, at der kommer et ’køb europæisk’-modsvar til præsident Bidens lovpakke.
- Vi skal komme med et meget stærkt svar. Vi skal styrke vores industrielle base, og vi skal forblive konkurrencedygtige, sagde præsident Macron, da han her til formiddag ankom til topmødet.

Frygter kapløb mod bunden
Europa-Kommissionens formand, Ursula von der Leyen, mener også, der er behov for at gentænkte måden, landene hjælper deres virksomheder gennem den grønne omstilling.
Ifølge hende er der nemlig en klar risiko for, at den amerikanske hjælpepakke fører til unfair konkurrence - ikke mindst for de europæiske elbilproducenter.
Deres amerikanske konkurrenter står nemlig til at få en økonomisk håndsrækning gennem nye, gunstige skattefradrag på op imod 50.000 kroner til borgere, der køber amerikanskproducerede elbiler.
- Det bør være et kapløb mod toppen, ikke bunden, sagde Ursula von der Leyen i går.
Hun foreslår blandt andet at justere EU’s statsstøtteregler, så det bliver lettere og hurtigere for medlemslandene at støtte den grønne omstilling.
Derudover bør landene ifølge kommissionsformanden se på, om der er brug for at flere offentlige investeringer i klimakampen. Eksempelvis gennem en ny, fælles ’suverænitetsfond’, som blandt andet skal målrettes grøn forskning og innovation og derved styrke Europa i konkurrencen mod især USA og Kina.
Det er uvist, hvordan fonden skal finansieres, men flere lande har på forhånd vendt tommelfingeren nedad til flere fælleslån fra medlemslandenes side, som man ellers så det under coronakrisen.
- Det er værd at tænke på, hvordan vi kan bruge de fonde, som skulle håndtere den gamle krise, til at kickstarte et økonomisk opsving i de nuværende kriser, sagde den tyske kansler, Olaf Scholz, i går.
Ingen appetit på handelskrig
Flere lande er også mere tilbageholdende med at pille ved den fælles industripolitik her og nu.
De frygter blandt andet, at det ender i et internt støtte-kapløb, hvor landene med de dybeste lommer vinder. Tidligere på året fik Tysklands regering hård kritik fra en række medlemslande, heriblandt Italien og Ungarn, efter at den havde vedtaget en svimlende stor hjælpepakke til at hjælpe de tyske virksomheder igennem den nuværende krise.
Fra dansk side, der i årevis har været en af forkæmperne for frihandel, er der heller ikke det store ønske om en mere protektionistisk kursdrejning i EU.
Der er allerede blevet talt om, at den nye amerikanske hjælpepakke kan føre til en handelskrig på tværs af Atlanten. Det er der dog ingen stor appetit på i Europa lige nu, og derfor håber landene også, at de kan finde en fredelig løsning med amerikanerne.
Præsident Biden sagde tidligere på måneden, at der kan laves ”justeringer”, så europæiske virksomheder lettere kan få gavn af den nye støttepakke. Men han har ingen planer om at ændre selve planen, der træder i kraft ved årsskiftet.
For udover at styrke den grønne omstilling handler det for præsident Biden også om at gøre USA mindre afhængig af Kina. Og det er ikke noget, EU-landenes bekymringer kommer til at ændre.
Der må de findes deres egen vej. Og ingen forventer, at der kommer en afklaring på spørgsmålet i dag.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Ukraine: Ukraine’s Democracy Faces Collapse as Civil Society Aid Disappears

India: America Could Make India Great Again

Ethiopia: Is the Loss of Aid an Opportunity for Africa?

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation