Extended Balloon Crisis: Has the US Played Itself?

Published in United Daily News
(Taiwan) on 17 February 2023
by Zhang Guangqiu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Matthew McKay. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
The United States and China are at yet another impasse after a Chinese spy balloon caused Secretary of State Antony Blinken to postpone a planned visit to Beijing. But as more and more balloons appear around the world, official U.S. attacks on Beijing have abated, and The Washington Post has even quoted intelligence officials saying that the first balloon to be shot down was an errant intrusion into U.S. airspace because it was monitored from the moment it lifted off. Given the about-face in the United States’ attitude, there may be more to this than meets the eye.

For one thing, a recent investigation by Pulitzer Prize-winner and veteran American journalist Seymour Hersh revealed that the explosions that destroyed [three of four] Baltic Sea Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last year occurred with the approval of President Joe Biden. Although the CIA immediately dismissed the report as a lie, Hersh’s report detailed how the perpetrators were graduates of the U.S. Navy Diving and Salvage Training Center in Panama City, Florida; how the plan began with numerous meetings within the White House prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine; and how the Norwegian government agreed to cooperate with the operation on the condition that it would use NATO’s summer exercises to plant the explosives, with the aim of severing Western Europe’s dependence on Russian gas. It appears that Hersh’s allegations were not without foundation.

For another thing, assuming the investigative report is true and given Hersh’s international reputation, the U.S. would have to move quickly — not just to avoid any rift in relations with Germany that could affect support for Ukraine, but also to capitalize on the Chinese Communist Party’s errant balloon narrative, given that the term “spy balloon” is not official.

Montana resident Chase Doak tweeted that what he first took for a UFO and then thought was a Wizard of Oz cosplay scenario turned out to be nothing more than a “run-of-the-mill Chinese spy balloon.” The problem with that is, it is hard to imagine the average person discovering something in the sky and associating it with a Chinese spy balloon. Later, a woman from the same state reported that the U.S. military had shot it down, and the U.S. military indeed subsequently shot the balloon down over the Atlantic Ocean. The whole balloon story, when strung together, seems to be playing out as if it were scripted.

The balloon crisis has been raging for more than half a month, with Beijing accusing the U.S. of also using spy balloons. After unidentified objects appeared in the skies over Japan and Europe, the U.S. intervened to deescalate the out-of-control situation, shifting its stance on the subsequent downing of objects from “not ruling out” to “not involving” either country’s intelligence agencies. This hardly makes for a convincing position, as U.S. intelligence officials have also recognized that the CCP’s balloon reconnaissance is not accidental — implying that they must be at least somewhat informed. Now, though, they are not able to show with any clarity where the balloons come from, and that is unbecoming of a powerful country.

The United States’ switch from arrogance to deference is mainly due to the fact that there is still no end in sight to the war between Russia and Ukraine, and that it is no longer advisable to create an enemy with whom to engage in direct conflict. What’s more, domestic, mainstream U.S. media and the West in general have been relatively indifferent to the Nord Stream bombing, so the Hersh report may not prove particularly effective.

On the other hand, with Biden’s failure to respond head-on to the issue of the spy balloons, something which upset Congress, the media reported that Biden might comment on the balloons before his visit to Poland, so it may be up to him to explain himself at that point.


中國偵察氣球導致美國國務卿布林肯原訂出訪北京延後,美中陷入另一場僵局。但隨著越來越多氣球出現在全球各地,美國官方攻擊北京的力道減弱,甚至華盛頓郵報引述情報官員的說法,首個遭擊落的氣球是誤闖美國,因為從它升空就一路被監控著。對比美國前後態度的轉折,內情恐不單純。

首先,普立茲獎得主、美國資深記者赫希近期調查指出,去年波羅的海北溪天然氣管線是拜登總統批准爆破的,雖立即遭到中情局斥為虛構故事,但在赫希的報告中詳細說明,執行者是畢業於佛州巴拿馬城「海軍潛水打撈中心」的學員,計畫始於俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭之前,白宮內部多次的會議內容,挪威政府答應配合行動的條件,是利用北約夏季演習安裝爆裂物,目的是切斷西歐對俄國天然氣的依賴,看來他是有所本的。

其次,假設調查報告是真的,又有鑑於赫希的國際聲望,為避免與德國的關係出現嫌隙,影響對烏國的支持,美國必須盡快轉移焦點,正好利用中共失控的氣球做文章,因為間諜氣球一詞不是出自於官方。

一位蒙大拿州居民道格在推特上說,起初認為天上的物體是飛碟,然後是綠野仙蹤裝扮場景,但就是一個普通的中國間諜氣球。問題是,一般人發現天上有東西,很難想像會聯想到是來自中國的間諜氣球;之後,一位同州的女士表示美軍已將其擊落,接著美軍就在大西洋擊落該氣球。將整個氣球事件串起來看,似乎是照著劇本走。

氣球危機延燒半個多月,北京指控美國也使用間諜氣球,日本、歐洲天上相繼出現不明物體後,美國開始出面緩和失控的場面,將後續擊落的東西,從不排除到不涉任一國情報行動,如此說法難令人心服,因為美國情報官員也承認中共的氣球偵察並非偶發,表示他們已有所掌握,如今卻無法說明氣球的出處,有失強國的風範。

美國前倨後恭的轉變,主要是因為俄烏戰爭尚看不到盡頭,不宜再樹立直接衝突的敵人,且美國國內主流媒體及西方國家,對北溪爆炸案相對冷處理,赫希報告應起不了太大作用。

反倒是拜登未正面回應間諜氣球,令國會相當不悅,所以媒體報導他有可能在訪問波蘭前,針對這些氣球事件發表評論,屆時就看他如何自圓其說。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Topics

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?