A Prime-Time Coup

Published in El País
(Spain) on 5 March 2023
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Fox News deliberately embraced Trump’s lies about the nonexistent theft of the 2020 election

During the two months between the presidential election that Joe Biden won in November 2020 and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, Fox News was instrumental in lending credibility to and amplifying the nonsense that the election was rigged. President Donald Trump took advantage of Fox News’ prime-time programming and his great influence over part of the Republican electorate to sabotage trust in democracy. Now, evidence in a lawsuit against the network has publicly revealed that Fox News executives and its news anchors did not believe the lies they told on screen.

One of the unfounded rumors the anchors spread was that Dominion Voting Systems machines switched votes from Trump to Biden in key states. The company is seeking $1.6 billion in damages for harm to its reputation and business because of the lies Fox spread. The court has received hundreds of pages of internal communications from Fox News that reveal the hypocrisy prevalent at the network. Star anchors who fueled the conspiracy privately said that Trump lawyers lied. Evidence reportedly shows that Fox anchors knew they were spreading misinformation but were afraid of losing viewers. “It is not red or blue,” said Rupert Murdoch, who owns the network, referring to the colors of the two political parties, “it is green,” a reference to the color of the dollar bill.

The lawsuit is pending and its outcome is uncertain. Mixing information and opinion is common in the news industry, even though Fox News takes it to the extreme. In the U.S., freedom of the press enjoys the highest constitutional protection. It is very hard to prove malicious intent in repeating claims that were not originally asserted by Fox but by Trump. Yet Murdoch denies that Fox endorsed the outgoing president’s unfounded lies and has blamed the individual comments of certain anchors.

It is impossible to assess the network’s degree of responsibility given the extreme fanaticism of the 2,000 Trumpists who stormed the Capitol. The greatest conspiratorial nonsense circulated through unconventional information channels. However, it is not hard to conclude that if the stars of the MAGAverse media had told the truth, the coup attempt Trump led would not have progressed as easily as it did. Forced to choose between letting down its viewers or fomenting a lie that is corrosive to democracy, Fox News chose the lie. This is a decision that goes well beyond corporate pragmatism. Legally guilty or not, the case is already regarded as the paradigm of ethical corruption that crosses the line between media and an instrument of agitprop.


Golpismo en máxima audiencia

La cadena Fox News adoptó deliberadamente las mentiras de Trump sobre el inexistente robo electoral de 2020

Durante los dos meses que pasaron entre las elecciones presidenciales que ganó Joe Biden, en noviembre de 2020, y el intento de asalto al Capitolio el 6 de enero, la cadena de televisión Fox News contribuyó de forma determinante a dar apariencia de credibilidad y amplificar el disparate de que la elección había sido amañada. A través de sus programas de máxima audiencia, el presidente Donald Trump utilizó su enorme predicamento sobre una parte del electorado republicano para sabotear la confianza en el sistema democrático. Ahora, las pruebas y declaraciones reveladas en una demanda contra la cadena han dado a conocer al público que la cúpula de Fox News, y los presentadores, no se creían las mentiras que proferían en pantalla.

Uno de los bulos difundidos fue que las máquinas de votación de una empresa llamada Dominion cambiaron votos de Trump a Biden en los Estados clave. La empresa asegura que eso dañó su imagen y su negocio y, en una demanda, reclama 1.600 millones de dólares de indemnización. El juez ha recopilado cientos de páginas de comunicaciones internas de Fox News que revelan la hipocresía que reinaba en la cadena. Presentadores estrella que daban pábulo a la conspiración afirman en privado que lo que dicen los abogados de Trump es mentira. Saben que cuentan bulos pero temen perder audiencia. “No es una cuestión de rojo y azul”, dice el dueño de la cadena, Rupert Murdoch, en referencia a los colores de los partidos; “es verde”, el color del dólar.

La demanda tiene un recorrido incierto. La mezcla de información y opinión es habitual en esa industria, aunque Fox News la lleve al extremo. La libertad de prensa goza de la máxima protección constitucional en EE UU. Es muy difícil demostrar una intención maliciosa en la repetición de afirmaciones que, en último término, no fueron inventadas por la Fox sino por Trump. Pero Murdoch niega en su declaración que la empresa respaldara los bulos del presidente saliente y deriva la responsabilidad a comentarios individuales de algunos presentadores.

Es imposible calcular cuál fue el grado de responsabilidad de la cadena en la fanatización extrema de los dos mil trumpistas que asaltaron el Capitolio. Los mayores disparates conspirativos circularon por canales de información no convencionales. Pero no es difícil intuir que, si las estrellas del magaverso mediático hubieran dicho la verdad, el intento de golpe de Estado liderado por Trump lo habría tenido más difícil. Forzado a elegir entre defraudar a su audiencia o agitar una mentira que corroe la democracia, Fox News eligió la mentira. Se trata de una decisión que va mucho más allá del pragmatismo empresarial. Culpable legalmente o no, el caso figura ya como paradigma de la corrupción ética que rompe la frontera entre un medio de comunicación y un instrumento de agitación y propaganda.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?