US Debt Limit Is Gradually Hardening While the Nation’s Strength Weakens

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 29 May 2023
by Shen Wen-han (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
America’s “soft” debt ceiling is a systemic flaw that causes spending and inflation to exceed the government’s revenue. The change from a soft debt ceiling to a “hard” one actually depends on the international financial market restraints on the demand for U.S. debt. The change in the demand function shifts with relationships among global geopolitics, economies and finance. Global multipolarization has continued to create strong competitive alternatives to U.S. debt, and there are opportunities to force the U.S. debt ceiling to change from soft to hard.

The U.S. debt ceiling is the amount of American debt that the U.S. Treasury Department can assume. The start of World War I caused a dramatic rise in government spending, and the scale of debt rapidly ballooned. Some U.S. legislators pushed Congress to pass a law that capped government debt. Congress initially introduced the idea of a debt limit in 1917, at which time the debt limit was $11.5 billion. Over the last hundred years, the U.S. debt limit has already been raised more than 100 times. Since 1960 alone, it has been raised 78 times — an average of more than once a year. This year on Jan. 19, U.S. debt had already reached the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling set on Dec. 16, 2021. Currently, the Democrats and Republicans are engaged in a fierce battle over raising the debt ceiling.* From the $11.5 billion debt ceiling in 1917 to the $31.4 trillion at the end of 2021, the U.S. debt ceiling has increased by almost 2,730 times.

No matter which party has a majority in the U.S. government, they both want to fulfill campaign promises and increase spending to gain voter support. After the debt ceiling was raised in 1960, it has been raised almost 50 times since under Republicans and about 30 times under Democrats. Republicans like to reduce taxes, while Democrats like to increase spending. To achieve these respective goals, both parties tend, and prefer, to raise the debt ceiling when they are in power.

In the past few decades, discussions have arisen over the risk of U.S. debt when the debt reaches the debt ceiling. Financial markets will reset the price of U.S. debt, and need to be compensated at a premium. When the U.S. defaults on its debt, as in 2011, the government credit rating is downgraded, creating fluctuations in the financial market. However, following each increase in the debt ceiling, the financial market has basically absorbed the risk of U.S. debt. A fundamental question is this: The U.S. has hit its debt ceiling, and even briefly defaulted, many times — why is the debt ceiling still being raised, and why do international markets still accept more and more U.S. debt?

The reason is that within the international financial market, a strong competitor that could replace U.S. debt has yet to emerge. U.S. debt is issued and used all over the world. While international investors hold approximately one-third of American-issued debt in circulation, the Federal Reserve is the largest single debt holder. As of May 18, within the Fed’s $8.5 trillion in total assets, the amount of government bonds reached about $5.2 trillion. International investors and the U.S. Fed already hold more than half the total value of debt in circulation, and investors within the U.S. hold the rest.

Because international investors hold so much U.S. debt, they can enact hard external constraints on the debt ceiling. The shift in the makeup of U.S. debt holders indicates that even though the U.S. dollar monetary system remains dominant internationally, holding U.S. debt has been affected by various factors such as geopolitical, economic and financial relationships. The demand for U.S. debt will change with the geopolitical, economic and trade changes brought about by the multipolarization of the global economy. The demand function of U.S. debt is complex.

Creating a hard constraint is difficult when the supply of U.S. debt depends on the U.S. itself, and so the debt ceiling is soft. However, a hard constraint exists for U.S. debt demand and will be determined by the appearance of another government’s bonds that can replace U.S. debt in the global financial market. From the perspective of national credit and competitiveness, if America’s soft debt ceiling gradually becomes hard, all of America’s global influence will decline significantly further.

*Editor’s Note: The bill to raise the debt ceiling was approved by Congress on June 1, 2023.


美債上限漸硬 國力漸軟

美國國債的「軟」上限,是造成美國政府收入不抵支出膨脹的制度性缺陷。美國國債「軟」上限變為「硬」上限,其實更多要取決於國際金融市場對美債需求形成的硬約束。美債需求函數的改變也是世界地緣政治、經濟金融關係的改變;世界多極化持續深入演進形成美債強有力的競爭替代品,有機會迫使美債從「軟」上限變「硬」上限。

美國債務上限是美國財政部可以承擔的美國債務數額。一戰爆發讓美國政府開支急劇上升,債務規模快速膨脹,美國一些議員推動國會通過法案,對政府債務規模畫出了上限。一九一七年美國國會首次引入「債務上限」概念,當時的債務上限是一一五億美元。一百多年以來,美國債務上限已經提高了一百多次,僅一九六○年以來六十多年的時間就提高了七十八次,平均每年超過一次。今年一月十九日美國債務已經達到二○二一年十二月十六日確定的卅一點四萬億美元上限,目前美國兩黨正就提高新一輪的債務上限進行激烈博弈。從一九一七年的債務上限一一五億美元到二○二一年底的卅一點四萬億美元,美國債務上限規模提高了近二七三○倍。


美國不論哪個黨執政,都想要履行競選承諾,都增加支出來獲取選民的支持。一九六○年以來債務上限的提高,有近五十次是在共和黨執政期內完成的,約卅次是在民主黨執政期內完成的。共和黨人喜歡少稅,而民主黨人喜歡多支出,為了保證各自目標的實現,美國兩黨都有在執政期內提高債務上限的傾向和偏好。

過去幾十年,出現過多次美債達到上限時關於美債風險的討論;金融市場會重新定價美債,需要有溢價補償。在出現債務違約時,比如二○一一年美國政府信用等級被下調,導致了金融市場的波動,但隨著每一次債務上限的提高,金融市場基本消化了美債違約風險定價。一個基本問題是:為什麼美國歷史上多次出現債務達到上限,甚至出現短期違約,美債上限還會被提高,國際市場還接受愈來愈多的美債?

原因是國際金融市場上尚未出現對美國國債形成強有力、具有替代性的競爭對手。美債是事實上的全球發行、全球使用,國際投資者持有美國發行的可流通國債總數約三分之一,美聯儲是美債的最大單一持有者。截止今年五月十八日,美聯儲約八點五萬億美元的總資產中,美國政府債券數量高達約五點二萬億美元。以美國可流通國債總價值來看,國際投資者和美聯儲持有的總數量已經超過了一半多一些,剩下不足一半由美國國內投資者持有。

國際投資者持有這麼龐大的美債,就可以對美債上限實施外部硬約束。美債持有者結構的變化表明,在美元貨幣體系還是主導性國際貨幣體系背景下,持有美債受到地緣政治、經濟、金融關係等多種因素的影響。美債需求將隨著全球經濟多極化帶來的地緣政治和經貿格局的變化而變化,美債需求函數是一個極其複雜的需求函數。

美債供給靠美國自身是很難出現硬約束的,美債是「軟」上限;但美債需求卻存在硬約束,取決於國際金融市場出現能替代美債的其他政府債券。從國家信用和競爭力來看,如果美債上限逐步變為「硬」約束,意味著美國在全球的影響力進一步顯著下降。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Brazil: Perplexity, Skepticism, Desperation

Russia: ‘Have Fun’*

Russia: Obama Has Escaped a False START

Austria: 1-0 Disney

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Taiwan: Why Does Cross-Strait Peace Require US Protection of Taiwan?

Taiwan: Will Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Become US Semiconductor Manufacturing ? We Should Be on Guard

Taiwan: Effects of Tariffs Need Attention

China: US Appropriately Handling Taiwan Question Might Be Watershed Moment for Relationship

Taiwan: Only with Respect and Tolerance Can There Be Diversity and Progress