Preventing Chaos in Tallying the US Presidential Vote Is Essential

Published in Sankei Shimbun
(Japan) on 6 October 2024
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dorothy Phoenix. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
Election day in the U.S. is only one month away. In the showdown between Democratic Party candidate Vice President Kamala Harris, and the Republican Party candidate, former President Donald Trump, the focus is on eligible voters in battleground states.

In previous elections that were close contests, many cases where there were doubts about the vote count and vote-counting process led to court battles, significantly delaying certification of the final results. There is concern that the same thing will happen again in this election.

If the final result is delayed, the chaos and division that exist in U.S. politics will only deepen. If the next president is not confirmed, it could also negatively impact the international community.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the tense state of affairs in the Middle East and China's aggression with Taiwan and other nations around the South China Sea's coast threaten world peace and stability. The world situation cannot tolerate a political vacuum in the United States.

Even if it is a close contest, it is absolutely essential that the U.S. presidential election proceed freely and fairly.

Democratic and Republican authorities in battleground states must scrupulously prepare for and enforce the proper election process. They must of course sternly deal with any election fraud.

During the 2000 election between Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democratic Vice President Al Gore, the vote was extremely close in Florida and led to a court battle. The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided the election, and Gore conceded defeat more than a month after Election Day.

The last presidential election took place in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mail-in voting was widely used to protect voters from infection. Trump complained that voting by mail was not trustworthy, and sued in several states.

In the current election, a poll conducted by Reuters this summer found that more than 80% of respondents said they were afraid there would be violence by political extremists after the election. In a separate survey, nearly 70% of respondents said they believed Trump was "not prepared" to accept the election outcome We cannot have such confusion.

Furthermore, there should be heightened vigilance with respect to foreign interference in the election by China, Russia and Iran, among others , countries that seek to spread disinformation online, incite violence, and stir up mutual hatred between the Democratic and Republican camps.


<主張>米大統領選 投開票の混乱回避重要だ

米大統領選の投開票日まで1カ月となった。民主党候補のハリス副大統領と共和党候補のトランプ前大統領が競り合い、激戦州の有権者の動向に注目が集まっている。

接戦となった過去の米大統領選では、集計の方法や投票自体の適切さなどへ疑義が出て法廷闘争となり、勝敗の確定が大幅に遅れたことが幾度もあった。今回も同様の事態が起きるのではと懸念されている。

決着のつかない状況が長引けば、米国政治の混乱と分断が深まるばかりとなる。次期大統領が確定しなければ、国際社会へも悪影響が及びかねない。

ロシアによるウクライナ侵略、緊迫する中東情勢、中国による南シナ海の沿岸国や台湾への威圧的行動など世界の平和と安定が脅かされている。世界の情勢は米国の政治空白を許す状況にはない。

大接戦であっても米国が大統領選を自由、公正にやり抜くことは極めて重要である。

激戦州の知事ら当局者や民主、共和の両陣営には、まっとうな選挙プロセスが確保されるよう綿密な準備と実施を求めたい。選挙不正にはもちろん厳格に対処する必要がある。

共和党候補だったブッシュ氏(子)と民主党副大統領だったゴア氏が戦った2000年の大統領選では、フロリダ州の得票差が僅差だったため両陣営による法廷闘争となった。決着は連邦最高裁に委ねられ、ゴア氏が敗北宣言をしたのは投票日から1カ月以上もたっていた。

20年の前回大統領選は、新型コロナウイルス禍の中で行われた。感染を避けるため郵便投票が広がった。トランプ陣営は郵便投票への不信などを訴えて各州で裁判を起こした。

今回の大統領選をめぐり、ロイター通信などの今夏の世論調査では回答者の8割以上が、過激派が投開票後に暴力行為を起こすと危惧していた。別の調査では、7割近くが、トランプ氏が大統領選の結果を受け入れる「準備ができていない」との見方を示した。このような混乱はあってはならない。

さらに、中国やロシア、イランなどの米大統領選への介入にも警戒を強めたい。専制国家はインターネットを通じた偽情報の拡散や暴力行為の扇動、民主・共和陣営相互の憎悪をかきたてようと狙っているからだ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Related Articles

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Japan: Partial Cease-fire: Avoid Putin’s Pace