The West, and the U.S. most of all, created and control Islamic terrorism.
What America wants least would be for the Arab world to unite, thus making it extremely difficult for Washington to control Middle Eastern oil, so it continues to prop up Israel, not to mention the fact that it incited eight years of war between Iran and Iraq; all with one goal in mind — profit.
This is how Obama, the president of 'Yes, we can,' the president of withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan, is also the president who could not avoid becoming entangled in another of the great conflicts of the Middle East.
Even though [Obama's] speeches are beautiful, they end up getting on your nerves due to the distance that separates practice from declarations of principle.
It’s not at all surprising that the White House and the Pentagon are the key players in the fluctuating and contradictory choices being made against the Islamic State group; they represent and convey a country which doesn’t feel the war.
Facts and events have proven that whenever Washington intervenes somewhere, terrorism comes next. Whenever it withdraws from somewhere, it leaves behind the means to serve its interests and greed.
A week after a lengthy article by American journalist Seymour Hersh was published in the London Review of Books challenging the official version of the pursuit and death of Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, many famous media outlets and concerned authorities considered it necessary to express their views on the [Read more]
A secret 2012 Pentagon document says an Islamic State would offer a strategic opportunity to topple Syria's government.
What game are the Saudis playing at, which has, with the help of the United States, set the so-called 'Arab' world ablaze and upside-down. For what profit?
For each admitted mistake that leaves Western victims, how many unknown ones are there, concerning local civilians or even children?