U.S. House of Representatives Pass So-Called “Tibet Resolution”

Published in Huanqiu News
(China) on 04-10-2008
by Jiesi Li & Jun Shen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Weihao Zhang. Edited by .
On April 9, just a few hours before the start of Olympic torch relay in San Francisco, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution that calls for “an end to crackdowns in Tibet by the Chinese government and the release of ‘peaceful’ Tibetan protesters.” Towards this move, Shen Dingli, the Administrative Vice Dean of The School of International Affairs at Fudan University in Shanghai, said to reporters that the House representatives “over-actively” exceeded their duties and meddled in diplomatic affairs which should be executed by the federal government. China welcomes the concerns for its domestic affairs, but the overbearing interferences will absolutely not be tolerated.

The resolution calls for “an end to the Chinese crackdowns”

ABC reported on the 9th of April that a large majority of House of Representatives passed this resolution. It was brought in by Nancy Pelosi who urged China to stop its crackdown in Tibet and release the “non-violent” rioters.

It is said that the resolution was passed with a margin of 413 to 1. The only blackball came from Ron Paul (R) who has recently dropped out the presidential election. It is also said that, coincidentally, the resolution was passed while the Olympic torch was in San Francisco and ready to have its sole relay in North America. This resolution was sponsored by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a few other representatives. It aims at urging Beijing to stop cracking down on Tibetan dissent and start “substantial talks” with the Dalai Lama.

Pelosi pointed out that hopefully through this resolution, the House of Representatives will be able to send Beijing the message that they support the “basic freedom” of the Tibetan people and a peaceful solution for the chaos in Tibet. “It is time for Beijing to reevaluate its frustrated Tibet policy and stop demonizing the Dalai Lama.” She said, “Beijing needs to show the world that they are capable of peaceful talks, instead of violence, as a responsible world power.

The House is meddling in other’s affairs and the “overbearing interference” is not acceptable

“These House of Representatives clearly has involved themselves in something that is not their business.” Shen Dingli said. He also stressed that the US government can discuss this issue with Beijing by executing its diplomatic power, which is a right that the House Representatives do not have. “Too, the protesters who where arrested were not 'non-violent’. These ‘non-violent’ protesters will never surrender to the police.”

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made another point on April 9th saying that “the US needs to set up a Consulate in Tibet because the American diplomats now cannot enter Tibet freely”, Professor Shen said that it is an ordinary request to set up Consulate in a foreign country. However, it is too sensitive to be declared in such a tensional period.

“However, China never fears any sensitivity as long as the US has a real need to set up Consulate in Tibet.” Shen said that an American consulate in that any region would have the purpose of promoting economic and cultural communication with the US. In comparison to Tibet he states, “I’m afraid that the US would not accept any request from China to set up a Consulate near any of its significant military bases.”

“As I said before, we welcome every concern that foreigners show regarding China. But it cannot develop into interference of Chinese domestic policy. China will always oppose any interference by the US from a US 'standard', especially when the ‘standard’ outrages both the Chinese government and the Chinese people.” The 'standard' that the Americans advocate is the same standard by which Americans make mistakes from time to time as well.


环球时报•环球网消息:4月9日,就在旧金山站奥运圣火传递活动开始前的几个小时,美国众议院通过了一项决议称,“呼吁中国结束在西藏的‘镇压’行动,并释放‘非暴力’示威藏人。”对此,复旦大学国际问题研究院常务副院长沈丁立在接受《环球时报》记者采访时认为,美众议院议员们“过分积极”地行使本该是美国政府的外交行政权,是一种“越俎代庖”的行为。中国欢迎关心外国人我国国内事务,但决不接受他们干涉我国内政。


  美众议院决议呼吁“中国结束‘镇压’行动”


  美国有线电视新闻网9日报道称,当天美国众议院以压倒性多数通过了一项决议,呼吁中国结束在西藏的“镇压”行动,释放那些在“非暴力”示威活动中被逮捕的藏人。


  消息称,当天众议院以413对1票通过了该项决议。唯一投上反对票的是刚刚退出总统竞选的众议员罗恩•保罗。报道还特别指出,该项决议的通过适逢北京奥运圣火在旧金山开始传递活动前的几小时。该项决议是由美国国会众议院议长南希•佩洛西和一些议员提出的,敦促中国政府结束在西藏的镇压活动并与流亡印度的达赖喇嘛进入“实质性对话”阶段。


  报道称,佩洛西称她希望美国众议院能向中国政府发出这样一个明确信息——他们支持西藏人民的“基本自由”,希望在西藏的动荡局面能获得和平解决。她说:“该是北京方面重新评价其失败政策和妖魔化达赖喇嘛的时候了。中国需要向世界表明它能够以一个负责任世界强国的形象展开文明对话。”

  众议院越俎代庖 中国不接受“干涉行为”


  “美众议院议员们的行为显然是越俎代庖的。”复旦大学国际问题研究院常务副院长沈丁立在接受《环球时报》记者采访时认为,美国政府可以行使外交行政权与中国政府就该问题进行探讨,但美众议院的议员们显然是没有这样的权利的。沈丁立说:“警方逮捕的不是‘非暴力’示威人士,那些‘非暴力’人士也不可能向警方‘自首’。”


  而对于美国国务卿赖斯在9日所称的“由于美外交官不能自由进入西藏,美意图在西藏设立领事馆”一事,沈丁立教授也认为,设立领事馆是一个正常的外交议题,但是美方的言论恰巧出现在这样一个比较敏感的时期。


  “但是,中国并不怕敏感,只要美方能够有正当的建领馆的理由。”沈丁立认为,建立领事馆是为了促进该地区与美国在经济和文化上的交流。但“美国人恐怕也不能接受中国在其重要的军事基地旁边设领事馆的要求吧”。


  “我们欢迎外国人关心中国国内事务,但绝不接受他们干涉我国内政。”沈丁立认为,中国反对美国用他们的“标准”干涉我国内政,更别提美方是以这种“令中国政府和中国人民感到不满的方式了”。事实也证明,美国人所崇尚的所谓的“标准”也经常犯错误。 (环球时报记者 李洁思 沈珺)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: US Pushes for Submission

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Topics

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary