9/11: The U.S. Did It To Themselves

Published in Dagsavisen
(Norway) on 15 September 2008
by Erik Sagflaat (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lars Erik Schou. Edited by .
This week, seven years have passed since the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. In the Arab world the most are still convinced that the U.S. themselves are responsible. As absurd as it may be, this delusion must be taken seriously.

To reject such conspiracy theories as nonsense is too simple, because it shows a gulf between the perception of reality in Western countries and Muslim countries. Journalists and others who have talked to average people around the bazaars, marketplaces and teahouses tell pretty much the same story. People in the Arab world simply do not believe that Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda are responsible for the attacks.

Maybe the people who executed the operation were Arab, but the brains? Not possible. This was organized by others. By the U.S. and the Israelis, says Mohammed Ibrahim, the proprietor of a clothes shop in Cairo to The New York Times. This attitude is widespread. It also reveals a failing Arab self-image. They simply doubt their own people’s ability to execute such a well planned and complicated attack against a superpower like the United States.

One rumor, even reported on television in some Arab countries, is that Jews who worked in the World Trade Center had been warned and told to stay home that day. That is claimed to be evidence that Israel was involved. That this is supposedly not true is simply not believed. In authoritarian and corrupt Arab nations, the faith in the government and mass media is so slim one has more faith in loose rumors around the bazaar than reliable sources.

It is claimed that the final proof that the U.S. did it is the war in Iraq. In Arab eyes, the U.S. only needed an excuse to secure Iraqi oil. The fact that Iraq and Saddam Hussein had no connection to 9/11 whatsoever is taken as further circumstantial evidence that this was merely the reason George W. Bush and his people needed – and therefore created.

These Arab beliefs expose a very serious communication problem. It speaks of two worlds who do not understand each other, and who cannot speak in a way that increases their understanding. This is dangerous, because the gulf will only become wider unless these problems are solved.

In the wider parts of the population in the Muslim countries, the Bush administration has lost all trust. It is too late to rectify this and George W. Bush started badly. We remember the overwhelming outpouring of sympathy to America hours and days after the attacks of 9/11. This included Arab nations. But Bush did not just declare “war on terror,” he declared a crusade. It was a catastrophic use of words that instantly took the attention away from the common fight on terrorism everyone initially supported. The crusade was perceived as a war cry against Islamic culture. The attempts to rectify the blunder were never heard.

Now we are reaping the bitter harvest. We can hope that the new administration taking over the United States in January can do better. But to rebuild the trust will take a long and focused effort.


Denne uken er det sju år siden terrorangrepene mot World Trade Center og Pentagon. I den arabiske verden vokser overbevisningen om at USA selv sto bak. Fullstendig absurd som den er, må villfarelsen likevel tas alvorlig.

Det er for enkelt bare å avvise slike konspirasjonsteorier som gigantisk tøv, fordi det viser en avgrunn mellom virkelighetsoppfatningen i vestlige land og muslimske land. Journalister og andre som har snakket med alminnelige folk i basarene, markedsplassene og tehusene, forteller temmelig entydige historier. Folk i den arabiske verden tror rett og slett ikke at det var Osama bin Laden og Al-Qaida som sto bak angrepene.

– Kanskje var folkene som utførte operasjonen arabere, men hjernene? Ikke mulig. Dette ble organisert av andre. Av USA og israelerne, sier Mohammed Ibrahim, innehaveren av en klesbutikk i Kairo, til The New York Times. Denne holdningen er utbredt. Den forteller også om et sviktende arabisk selvbilde. Man tiltror ikke sine egne evnen til å gjennomføre et så godt planlagt og komplekst angrep mot en supermakt som USA.

Et utbredt rykte, til og med gjengitt i fjernsynet i noen arabiske land, er at jøder som arbeidet i World Trade Center var blitt advart og hadde fått beskjed om å holde seg hjemme denne dagen. Det tas som et bevis på at Israel var involvert. At dette er usant, blir ikke trodd. I de autoritære og korrupte arabiske landene er tiltroen til myndigheter og massemedier så liten at man har større tiltro til løse rykter i basaren enn til etterrettelige dementier.

Det endelige beviset for at USA selv sto bak, er krigen i Irak, blir det hevdet. I arabiske øyne trengte USA et påskudd for å sikre seg Iraks olje. At Irak og Saddam Hussein uansett ikke hadde noen som helst forbindelse til det som skjedde 11. september, tas som et ytterligere indisium på at dette bare var et påskudd som president George W. Bush og hans folk trengte – og derfor skaffet seg.

De arabiske holdningene avslører et meget alvorlig kommunikasjonsproblem. De forteller om to verdener som ikke forstår hverandre, og som heller ikke klarer å snakke sammen på en måte som øker forståelsen. Dette er farlig, fordi kløften bare vil øke dersom problemene ikke løses.

Bush-administrasjonen har uansett mistet all tillit i de brede lag av befolkningen i de muslimske landene. Dette er det for sent å rette opp. George W. Bush kom skjevt ut. Vi husker den overveldende sympatien som strømmet mot USA i timene og dagene etter angrepene. Også fra arabiske land. Men Bush erklærte ikke bare «krig mot terror», han erklærte korstog. Det var en katastrofal bruk av ord som med ett fjernet oppmerksomheten fra den felles kampen mot terror som alle til å begynne med støttet opp om. Korstog ble oppfattet som er krigsrop om kulturkamp mot muslimer. Forsøkene på å rette opp fadesen ble aldri hørt.

De bitre fruktene høster vi nå. Det er å håpe at den nye administrasjonen som tar over i USA i januar kan gjøre det bedre. Men å gjenoppbygge tilliten vil uansett kreve en langvarig og målrettet innsats.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Topics

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Related Articles

Norway: Assange Can Be Extradited to the United States, Risks 175 Years in Prison

Norway: Ziwe Fumudoh Has Based Career on Making White Interview Subjects Uncomfortable*

Norway: Could Latin America Be the Winner of the New Cold War?

Norway: Oscar Worthy Portrayal in ‘Passing’

Norway: Facebook’s Metaverse Will Make Us Even More Vulnerable