Should the Planalto Palace* be looking towards the U.S. presidential candidates in the hopes of starting to propose partnerships for 2009-2012?
The Foreign Minister Celso Amorim told this blog, in New York, that Brasilia is making a point of staying far away from this dispute. “Lula is the president, they are candidates. It is not our place to seek them out. But, if they would like, Lula is always open to talking.”
The only Planalto-campaign bridge is the Brazilian Ambassador in Washington, Antonio Patriota, who stays in touch with the Latin America advisors for both campaigns, Daniel Restrepo (Obama), and Otto Reich (McCain). When I asked Restrepo, in Denver, which questions Obama had asked him about Brazil, he could not tell me any. Reich, in St. Paul, was more direct. He said Latin America was far from the top of McCainÂ’s list of priorities, and that the countries that interest McCain in the region were the enemies, led by Venezuela.
There are those who think that Brazil should take greater advantage of the change in administration to start negotiating partnerships that could be accepted by the candidates’ administrations. Among them is columnist Clovis Rossi. “If I were Lula, I would call Barack and say, ‘Friend, let’s join forces in our common interests and your problems will be solved,’” he wrote in Folha, about a possible partnership regarding Brazilian sugar cane ethanol so that the U.S. could reduce its dependency on oil from the Middle East (Obama is against setting preferential trade terms for our ethanol, and is best friends with American corn ethanol producers, hence the need to try to sell him the idea).
Asked by a reporter from Agência Brasil if he would watch Friday’s debate, Amorim said that this would depend on what movies were on T.V. that night. “Last night Casablanca was on. I really like cinema,” he answered. Cinematographic good taste on the part of Amorim. I wonder what his electoral taste is. “Both have their own brand of personal charm,” he said about Obama and McCain.
Lula is cheering for Obama, according to our colleague Kennedy Alencar, because he thinks he is better prepared to take the U.S. out of the crisis.
*Brazilian Presidential Palace
Planalto quer distância da campanha nos EUA
Planalto quer distância da campanha nos EUA
O Palácio do Planalto deveria procurar os candidatos à Presidência dos EUA para propor, desde já, parcerias para 2009-2012?
*
Perguntado por uma repórter da Agência Brasil se assistiria ao debate de sexta-feira, Amorim disse que isso dependeria dos filmes que estivessem passando na TV. "Ontem passou Casablanca. Eu gosto muito de cinema", respondeu. Bom gosto cinematrográfico o de Amorim. Qual será seu paladar eleitoral? "Simpatia pessoal cada um tem a sua", nos disse, sobre Obama e McCain.
Lula torce por Obama, segundo nosso colega Kennedy Alencar, por julgá-lo melhor preparado para tirar os EUA da crise.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.