As the experienced say, usually after the elections the winner corrects his promises. Thanks to those made by Barack Obama and thanks to the popularity supported but also created by the media Obama is keeping “colossal” lead of 5 percent before his adversary.
Those monstrous promises are a good reason for the Americans to leave them as well as the remarkableness of the first colored candidate for U.S. president as a history.
McCain with his realistic program and approach to the biggest problems stays with his feet on ground.
That’s why his popularity and stays behind the “catastrophic” 5 percent. If he was leading by 5 percent, would we be saying about McCain – mania in the media? Surely not, instead we’d be saying about a disaster. But with confidence about Obama – mania if the Democratic candidate leads by 15 percent. If he was leading by 15 percent how would the media call it?
Maybe thatÂ’s why itÂ’s better to pay attention to the influence of the media.
Today, I watched a WORLD REPORT and AFRICA INSIDE programs on CNN. Guess, what name was heard the most there? Interviews with “randomly” selected respondents created a picture of people’s approach to the U.S. presidential elections in Europe and Africa. Do you think that they spoke about both candidates? No. If Obama is ‘pushed’ by the media in Europe as well as in Africa, however, here but also there, are those who like McCain. Do you think that they had a chance to express that? No.
Do you think that if the Slovak television did similar reports in near countries for example in the countries of V4 (Visegrad Group) where it would openly favor one candidate in our presidential elections, letÂ’s say the one you donÂ’t prefer but he would be better for foreign countries would you like that? I know, not. And me neither.
I think that Obamamania is a intentional marketing phenomena which is intended to provoke emotional expectations of brilliant change. And also massive bombarding American voters by expectations of “world public opinion” shall help to swamp Bush.
McCain is not Bush, America is not Europe, and CNN is not omnipotent. I hope that Europe will never be a part of the United States and that CNN will never be omnipotent. ThatÂ’s why I hope that the Americans will vote for an American president.
CNN a Obama = cesta vydláždená s?ubmi a fikciou.
MyslÃm si, že obamamánia je marketingový jav vyvolaný ú?elne, ktorý má za úlohu vzbudi? emotÃvne o?akávania úžasnej zmeny. A tiež masÃvnym bombardovanÃm amerických voli?ov o?akávaniami "verejnej svetovej mienky" má dopomôc? porazi? na hlavu Busha.
No McCain nie je Bush, Amerika nie je Európa a CNN nie je všemocná. Dúfam, že Európa sa sú?as?ou Ameriky nikdy nestane, a že ani CNN všemocná nikdy nebude. Preto dúfam, že ameri?ania si za prezidenta zvolia ameri?ana.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.