Another Korean War in the Next Three Years?

Published in Creaders
(China) on 30 November 2008
by Li Tian Tong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yaqing Wen. Edited by Christie Chu.
Most people know that Obama is a Muslim sympathizer. After he takes office, the first thing he will do is improve relations with Islamic countries. During his term, there definitely will not be any more wars against Islamic countries.

However, if there were no new wars involving the U.S., then the prominence of the U.S. in the international weapon trade will greatly diminish, and that is something that the American arms dealers and the Pentagon cannot have. Therefore, American capitalists, politicians, and congressmen must lobby the American government for a new war.

Where would be the next war be? Africa? Impossible. There would be no spoils. West Asia? Obama would not allow it. South America? The U.S. would not start a fight on its own doorstep. East Asia? Yes, the next war involving the U.S. will very likely target North Korea or another country such as Myanmar.

China will benefit no matter which country is the U.S. opens fire upon. Will China choose to fight the U.S. like in the first Korean War? The way I see it, China will not place as much emphasis on camaraderie as before. Because of this, North Korea, like Iraq, will have to face a American, South Korean, and Japanese alliance all by itself. The most China might do would be to take in wounded North Koreans and supply the civilians with food and everyday supplies. However, it will never again fight the U.S. directly.

Since Obama’s election victory, North Korea has gotten wind of an impending war, so the higher-ups in North Korea have been smarter than Saddam and did not let the United Nations gather information in the area, but instead drove out all United Nations and South Korean personnel. Closing off all of the passages to South Korea, for example, was a part of this decision.

North Korea is weak. For the weak country to defeat the strong, it must have some trick up its sleeve. If the U.S., South Korea, and Japan were to become allies and wage war on North Korea, then North Korea would have a very hard time resisting the allied troops. The result would be the occupancy of North Korea by the allied troops.

There is a way for North Korea and allied troops to be evenly matched. The ruler of North Korea has the surname of Kim (金 pronounced Jin). Kim is the last name of Manchurian rulers, but not many people know that Manchurians and Mongolians both used to share the surname Lee (李 pronounced Li). In ancient times, the Mongolians and Manchurians lost a bet, so the Mongols took the name of Li and became the Mongoli, and the Manchurians vowed to never take the name of Lee. The ancestor of the Mongolians was named Lee Mugu, and he had ten (十) sons. The ancestor of Manchurians was named Li Shugu, and he has eight sons (八). Thus, the Mongolian war flag bears the symbol for ten, "十", and the Manchurian country was founded with a flag bearing the symbol "八" for eight. Li Desheng (a pseudonym of Mao Tse-tong) turns out to be a Mongolian name, and Zhou Enlai turns out to be an authentic Manchurian. Therefore, for North Korea to gain victory against the allied troops, it must comprehend the importance of the symbol "八."

”十” (ten, pronounced shi) stands for time (“天时”, heaven’s natural order, pronounced tian shi),”八”(eight, pronounced ba) stands for space (“地理”, geography, pronounced di li),”子” (child, pronounced zi) stands for harmony amongst men (人和, pronounced ren he). 十,八, and 子 together forms the character Li (李). I have figured out the meaning of the character Li, but cannot explain to the public.

Korea is a narrow piece of land. If allied American, Japanese, and South Korean troops were to start a war, North Korea would not have any room to contend with American troops, and China would never let North Korea use its land for battle. What is North Korea to do?


天仝:三年内美国可能会发动第二次韩战
送交者: 天仝 2008年11月30日05:29:17 于 [军事天地] 发送悄悄话
三年内美国可能会发动第二次韩战

众所周知,奥巴马是亲穆斯林人物,他上台后,首先要做的事就是改善美国与穆斯林国家的关系,所以在他任内美国不会再发生针对穆斯林的战争。然而,假若美国不发生新的战争,那么美国在全球的军火交易将大大地缩减,这是美国军火商及美国五角大楼绝不会容忍的事,所以美国大资本家、政客、议员等必游说美国政府发动新的战争。

美国下一次战争将选在那里好呢? 欧洲? 不可能? 非洲? 没油水捞? 西亚? 奥巴马不干? 南美洲? 美国不会选择在自己的家门口发动战争,亚州? 是了,美国下一次战争目标很可能选择北韩或者缅甸之类的国家。

在亚洲无论选择任何国家开战都将牵扯到中国利益,中国会否因此象韩战一样选择直接与美国开战呢? 依我看,中国当局不会再象其前任一样看重道义,若美国再次发动针对北韩的战争,中国会选择利益而不会再选择道义。因此,北韩将象伊拉克一样孤军与美日韩同盟决战。中国所能尽的道义很可能是收留来自北韩的伤残人员,以及供应北韩部分生活日用品及粮食,而再也不会直接与美军开战。

自从奥巴马获胜后,北韩已经闻到了战争的气息,所以北韩高层绝不会蠢的象萨达姆一样任凭联合国人员在其境内收集情报,而是事先就将来自南韩和联合国的情报人员如数地驱逐出境。北韩关闭与南韩的所有通道就是北韩所做出的选择。

北韩是一个弱者,以弱抗强,有何高招? 若美日韩同盟决议与北韩开战,那么北韩将很难抵挡盟军的攻击,战争的最后结果是盟军占领北韩。

但是本人却又一招,能令北韩军与美日韩同盟军打个旗鼓相当。北韩的统治者姓金,金姓是满族统治者的姓氏,可是大家很少知道满族与蒙古族一样最初都姓李,古时,蒙古族与满族的祖先由于与人打赌输了,所以蒙古族就将李到过来写称为Mongoli,而满族祖先就发誓不姓李。蒙古族的祖先叫李木古,他生了十个儿子,满族的祖先加李树谷,他生了八个儿子。所以蒙古军以"十"旗横扫欧亚大陆,而满族以"八"旗立国。毛泽东李德胜就是一个地道的蒙古人,周恩来却是一个地道的满族贝勒爷。所以,北韩若要在与美军的对决中保持不败,首先就要悟通"八"这个字。

十就是时间(天时),八就是空间(地理),子就是人和。十八子就是一个李字。本人虽然悟通了"李"这个字,但是本人不能广而告知,非常对不起。

北韩南韩是一块狭窄之地,若美日韩同盟对北韩开战,北韩没有空间与美军周旋,而中国也绝不会让北韩借自己的国土周旋,那么北韩将如何是好? 请问诸位有何高见?假若诸位是北韩的领导人,你们将做出何种抉择?


(要会运用相对时空)


李天仝
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Topics

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Related Articles

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Previous article
Next article