The financial climate is in regulation - regulation dictated by emotion. Last week, American representatives voted for a special law to tax 90 percent of the bonuses given to AIG, the insurance giant rescued from bankruptcy thanks to taxpayer money. On Thursday, France announced that it would block the allocation of bonuses and stock options for corporate leaders to companies helped by the state as early as next week.
There have been abuses, but it’s not just that. This debate has left the realm of rationality, and heads are on the chopping block. But that type of approach won’t resolve the crisis.
In a long speech given on Wednesday, Tim Geithner laid down the basis for future – and severe – financial regulation in America, and thus the world. Criticized for his inaction in the past few weeks, the Treasury secretary took initiative once more. On Monday he detailed a rather well-received bank bailout plan, which quenched the fire and started preparations for the future of finance.
His willingness to lead comes just a week before the G20 summit convenes in London. The same willingness was also evident in Barack Obama as the American president set the objectives of the summit, published a few days ago in the press: “To stimulate growth, stabilize and regulate finance.”
On this last point, Tim Geithner proves that he has good sense. He wants to unify a surveillance system that has been scattered until now, or at least make sure he’s got the players covered. He will have to make sure that this reorganization doesn’t add floors to a building that is already too complex, but that it rearranges the space that already exists.
The United States hasn’t forgotten the hunt for the “fiscal paradise.” The Geithner plan is just a small detail and only a little part of the problems facing the world economy. Alas, for the moment, this issue is the only point of agreement for leaders of the G20. If they settle for just this on April 2nd, they will have signed the failure of their meeting, which is no less disturbing than the lack of leadership.
Le climat est à la réglementation. A la réglementation sous le coup de l’émotion. La semaine dernière, les Représentants américains votaient un impôt spécial pour taxer à 90% les bonus versés à des cadres d’AIG, le géant de l’assurance sauvé de la faillite grâce à l’argent des contribuables. Jeudi, la France annonçait interdire dès la semaine prochaine l’attribution de bonus et de stock-options aux dirigeants des entreprises aidées par l’Etat.
Il y a eu des abus, mais pas seulement. Le débat a quitté le terrain de la rationalité, il faut couper des têtes. Mais ce n’est pas avec ce type de démarche qu’on résout la crise.
Dans un long discours prononcé hier à Washington, Tim Geithner a pris de la hauteur et jeté les bases de la future – et sévère – «régulation financière» américaine, donc mondiale. Critiqué ces dernières semaines pour son inaction, le secrétaire au Trésor a repris l’initiative. Lundi déjà, il avait détaillé son programme de soutien aux banques, plutôt bien accueilli. Le voilà qui éteint l’incendie, et prépare les plans de la future maison de la finance.
Cette volonté de reprendre le leadership intervient une semaine avant la tenue du sommet du G20, à Londres. Elle est aussi clairement affichée dans le texte de Barack Obama publié ces jours dans la presse, dans lequel le président américain fixe les objectifs de cette réunion: «Stimuler la croissance, stabiliser et réguler la finance.»
Sur ce dernier point, Tim Geithner fait preuve de beaucoup de bon sens. Il veut unifier une surveillance jusqu’ici dispersée, ou s’assurer qu’elle couvre les bons acteurs. Il faudra encore que cette réorganisation n’ajoute pas d’étages à un édifice déjà trop complexe, mais qu’elle réaménage les espaces existants.
Les Etats-Unis n’oublient pas la chasse aux «paradis fiscaux». Ce n’est qu’un détail du plan Geithner et qu’une petite partie des problèmes que rencontre l’économie mondiale. Pour l’heure, hélas, cette question est le seul point d’entente des dirigeants du G20. S’ils s’en contentaient le 2 avril, ils signeraient l’échec de leur réunion. Tout autant qu’une inquiétante absence de leadership.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
lets get this straight americans worship at the altar of capitalism but use money borrowed from communist china to keep their brand of capitalism afloat.
then after a few years of socialism and lots of printed and borrowed money they want to return to capitalism. this folks is paradigm paralysis in action.
we did not learn the ills of nation building and imperialism from vietnam it looks like we have yet to learn the ills of capitalism.
capitalism is about wealth generation for the few not people.
and the world is waiting to see what america does.
yea that should work. not!
do you think the american middle class will wake up to the ills of capitalism or will they continue to blame politicans, unions, and CEO’s for all their problems.
lets get this straight americans worship at the altar of capitalism but use money borrowed from communist china to keep their brand of capitalism afloat.
then after a few years of socialism and lots of printed and borrowed money they want to return to capitalism. this folks is paradigm paralysis in action.
we did not learn the ills of nation building and imperialism from vietnam it looks like we have yet to learn the ills of capitalism.
capitalism is about wealth generation for the few not people.
and the world is waiting to see what america does.
yea that should work. not!
do you think the american middle class will wake up to the ills of capitalism or will they continue to blame politicans, unions, and CEO’s for all their problems.