Obama's Help Won't Save Jobs at GM

Published in G1
(Brazil) on 2 June 2009
by Carlos Alberto Sardenberg (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marcela Canavarro. Edited by Louis Standish.
Obama's administration is putting a lot of money into GM – giving more than 50 billion USD last time – something that characterizes a clear nationalist policy. The goal is saving an authentic American company, whose bankruptcy would hurt the national pride more than the economy.

In fact, President Obama is helping GM but not alleviating that said painful adjustment. It's really painful.

The new GM plans to have 38,000 workers in the U.S. by 2011. Do you know how many there are today? 243,000!

Do you know how many they were in 2002? 338,000. In other words, the cleaned-up company, with government assistance, will have a little bit more than one tenth of its workforce than it had at the beginning of the century

Take into consideration that with no government help, something similar would have happened under normal market forces. The good parts of GM would have been bought/absorbed by other companies, the bad part would have been closed, like what will probably happen.

But the process would be much more painful for national pride. Can you imagine the pictures and videos with the GM brand being taken off the tops of buildings? (Like what happened to PanAm decades ago).


O governo Obama está colocando muito dinheiro na GM – mais US$ 50 bilhões no último aporte – no que caracteriza uma clara política nacionalista. O objetivo é salvar uma empresa americana da gema, cuja destruição feriria mais o orgulho do que a economia.

Mesmo porque o presidente Obama está ajudando a GM, mas não está aliviando o ajuste, dito doloroso. E põe doloroso nisso.

Um único dado: a nova GM planeja chegar a 2011 com 38 mil trabalhadores nos EUA. Sabem quantos são hoje? 243 mil!

Sabem quanto em 2002? 338 mil. Ou seja, a empresa saneada, com ajuda do governo, vai ficar com pouco mais de um décimo dos trabalhadores que tinha no início deste século.

O que nos leva à observação: sem ajuda do governo, pelas forças do mercado, poderia acontecer coisa parecida. As partes boas da GM seriam absorvidas/compradas por outras companhias, o ruim seria fechado, como será.

Só que o processo seria muito mais doloroso para o orgulho nacional. Já imaginaram as fotos e vídeos com a marca GM sendo retirada do alto dos prédios? (Como aliás aconteceu com a PanAm, décadas atrás).
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

South Africa: Why Nothing Will Stop Trump from Throwing Mud at SA

Saudi Arabia: Can Trump Really Ban the Muslim Brotherhood?

Saudi Arabia: The Deeper Implications of the F-35 Deal

Spain: Marco Rubio: Semiotics of the ‘Bully’

Nigeria: The Words of the King of Mar-a-Lago

Topics

Mexico: Maduro Warns US: ‘They Will Never Be Able To Remove Us’

Egypt: Palestine and Western Public Opinion – A Battle That Continues

Argentina: Argentina-US Agreement: The Real Context

Israel: It Is Time To Confront the Muslim Brotherhood

South Africa: Why Nothing Will Stop Trump from Throwing Mud at SA

Saudi Arabia: Can Trump Really Ban the Muslim Brotherhood?

Honduras: The Strange Hope of an Unstable Country

Nigeria: The Words of the King of Mar-a-Lago

Related Articles

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons

Colombia: US Warships Near Venezuela: Is Latin America’s Left Facing a Reckoning?

Germany: Learn from Lula