E.U. and U.S. Strategy Converge on Middle East

Published in People's Daily
(China) on 15 June 2009
by Yang Jun (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by . Edited by Caitlin Krieck.
After E.U. High Representative Javier Solana visited Israel, Palestine and Lebanon, he conducted a meeting in Cairo on June 14th, during which he concluded that there were currently near identical approaches shared by E.U. and the U.S. concerning Middle Eastern problems. When Solana met with Lebanese President Michel Slaimen, he pointed out that “for the first time the United States and the EU shared the close positions”. Nearly simultaneous with Solana, U.S. Mideast Envoy George Mitchell also visited Israel, Palestine, Lebanon and Syria.

After President Obama stepped into the White house, the U.S. administration started to open dialogues with former “opponent” countries. Mitchell’s trip to the numerous Middle Eastern countries served to reinforce America’s preference for a ‘talking’ policy regarding issues in the Middle East.

During Solana’s trip, he met with Lebanese President Michel Slaimen, Prime Minister Fouad Saniora, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh and, for the first time, Hezbollah MP Hussein Hajj Hassan. And Solana stated that the “lists of terrorist groups are not the same in every country”.

On the same day, U.S. Envoy Mitchell met Syrian President Bashar in Damascus. Mitchell was the first American high-ranking official to visit Damascus after four years of strained relations between the United States and Syria since 2005. Syria will play an important role in establishing peace in the Middle East, said Mitchell.

After the meeting, the U.S. Envoy to the Middle East told reporters that America will strive to seek peace between Syria and Israel, between Lebanon and Israel, and between the Palestinians and Israel, underlining the need for America and Syria to create suitable conditions for negotiations.

E.U. and American officials visited several Middle Eastern countries nearly at the same time, and also publicly contacted Hezbollah in both Lebanon and Syria; the Occident generally excludes both groups from international workings but visiting officials admitted that both play important roles in Middle East affairs.

It’s obvious that E.U. and America are working to persuade Middle Eastern countries to cooperate in order to establish suitable conditions for a new round of talks.

Past experience in the Middle East has proved that taking one side or isolating another cannot solve the issue thoroughly. Negotiations are necessary and everyone has to sit down and talk-some compliments and appeasements might be required to get them to the table.


欧美同打“接触”牌


本报驻叙利亚记者 杨 俊
2009年06月15日00:00
  欧盟负责外交和安全政策的高级代表索拉纳在访问了以色列、巴勒斯坦和黎巴嫩之后,14日在埃及首都开罗表示,美国和欧盟在中东和平进程问题上的立场是一致的。索拉纳12日在与黎巴嫩总统苏莱曼会谈时强调,欧盟和美国有关中东问题的立场“首次如此接近”。几乎与索拉纳的中东之行同时,美国中东问题特使米切尔也到访以色列、巴勒斯坦、黎巴嫩和叙利亚。

  欧美同黎巴嫩真主党和叙利亚公开接触

  美国总统奥巴马入主白宫后,对此前被美国视为“敌手”的国家和组织实施了“接触”政策。此次美国中东问题特使的访问,再一次显示出美国中东新政策的“接触”特点。而索拉纳的中东之行,“接触”的意味也很浓厚。

  索拉纳在访问黎巴嫩期间,除会见黎巴嫩总统苏莱曼、总理西尼乌拉、议长贝里和外长萨卢赫外,还首度与真主党政治人物进行了接触。在13日与真主党议员团成员侯赛因·哈吉·哈桑会谈后,索拉纳对新闻界说,真主党是黎巴嫩社会和政治生活的一部分。在关于真主党是否是恐怖组织的问题上,索拉纳表示“一个国家与另一个国家判断恐怖组织有区别”。

  同日,叙利亚总统巴沙尔接见了首次到访大马士革的米切尔。米切尔是自2005年叙美关系交恶后到访大马士革的最高级别美国官员。会谈后,米切尔高度评价叙利亚在中东和平方面所具有的重要作用,重申美国希望在叙以、黎以和巴以之间实现和平,美国和叙利亚都肩负着为和谈创造条件的义务。

  为开启新一轮中东和谈创造有利条件

  欧美官员几乎在同一时间内访问中东,并与此前被西方社会所排斥的黎巴嫩真主党和叙利亚进行公开接触,而且承认它们在中东地区事务中的重要作用,这是欧美中东政策出现显著调整的表现。

  不难看出欧美两大势力此番游说中东的目的很明确,即团结原有盟友,拉拢昔日敌手,为全面开启新一轮中东和谈创造有利条件。

  中东地区过去的动荡证明,一味袒护冲突中的一方,打压并孤立另一方,是不可能彻底解决问题的。既然要和谈,就必须将所有各方都拉到谈判桌上,适当的肯定和安抚有利于创造良好的谈判气氛。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Topics

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Poland: Los Angeles Riots: Battle for America’s Future

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice