The Story Behind Obama’s Olive Branch to North Korea

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 21 September 2009
by Ma Ting (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anna Isaacson. Edited by Alex Brewer.
The Obama regime has suddenly changed its stance on North Korea. A State Department spokesperson recently reported that the State Department is preparing for bilateral talks with North Korea to pressure the nation to rejoin the six-party talks. Up until now, the U.S. had insisted that North Korea first rejoin the six-party talks. Now the United States has taken the initiative to enable direct bilateral talks with North Korea. What’s the back story?

First, this development indicates that the United States may be making an effort to fundamentally revise its global nuclear strategy.

The United States has been vacillating on the North Korea nuclear question for a long time, indicating that it has not come up with a way to systemically reform its nuclear policy. During the cold war, the “strategy of containment” so fundamental to the U.S. nuclear policy was logical, clear, and effective. With the conclusion of the Cold War and the global proliferation of nuclear weapons, the U.S.’ nuclear nonproliferation strategy has been drawn in two different directions; nuclear strategy has become the U.S.’ Achilles’ heel. Nuclear weapons are the main source of conflict in the Middle East, in Iraq and Iran, and between Pakistan and India. North Korea has made the utmost of the strategic potential of its nuclear weapons.

During his eight years in office, Bush squandered most of his energy on the Iraq War, and had little left for the comprehensive revision of nuclear strategy that the end of the Cold War made necessary. Obama has clearly stated that he supports total nuclear disarmament. However, this is merely a distant goal, so distant that the president himself has said that he does not believe he will achieve it during his presidency. But Obama understands that in order to go down that long road, the United States must begin by fundamentally rethinking its nuclear strategy.

The United States has already submitted a comprehensive resolution on nuclear nonproliferation and disarmament to UN member nations, expected to be adopted on the 24th of this month. Suffice to say, Obama has made his move, but it is a limited one. The resolution made no mention of the nuclear test-ban, which the U.S. has long been unable to agree to. What’s more, we are still not seeing the United States fundamentally restructure its nuclear policy or lay out a framework for global negotiations on nuclear weapons after the resolution is passed.

Second, things are beginning to get interesting for Japan’s new administration.

The only obstacle to direct talks with North Korea is Japan. To this day, Japan’s only motivation for participating in the six-party nuclear talks has been to obstruct those talks. If the six-party talks is successful, Japan would have to normalize relations with North Korea, and in turn would have to make apologies, dispense compensation, and face up to other awkward obligations. Furthermore, the day that relations with North Korea are normalized will be the day Japan will lose its excuse for military build-up. Thus, when it comes to the six-party talks, it is in Japan’s interest to conflate the North Korean nuclear problem with North Korea’s kidnapping of Japanese citizens, when, in fact, the issues are unrelated.

North Korea knows well that if it can only normalize relations with the United States, Japan will be a cinch. This is why North Korea relentlessly pursues the United States, but is standoffish towards Japan.

However, Japan is now in the midst of an administration change. Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama has sought diplomatic independence from the United States, and at the same time has insisted that the United States, in its dealings with North Korea in the six-party talks, give special attention to the kidnappings issue. So the U.S. has used the opportunity to suddenly choose to leave Japan alone, as if to say, “If you want to be independent, then I won’t have anything to do with you!”

Almost at the same time, North Korea has reached out to the new Democratic Party of Japan administration to propose talks between the two nations, something that has rarely been seen this year. This move on North Korea’s part indicates that North Korea hopes the new Democratic Party administration in Japan will go easy on North Korea. Just as the United States turns its attention away from Japan, North Korea views this as an opportunity to develop relations with Japan.



奥巴马向朝鲜摇橄榄枝的背后
奥巴马政权突然改变态度,国务院发言人近日表示,准备与朝鲜举行双边会谈,对敦促朝鲜重返六方会谈。与此前的表态不同的是,这次美国突然一改以“必须回到六方会谈”为前提条件,主动开启了美朝直接进行双边会谈的窗口,其背景何在呢?
  一是预示着美国可能要从根本上考虑修正全球核战略。
  美国长期在朝核问题上的摇摆不定,实质上是其整体核政策没有得以修正的表象之一。冷战时期,美国以“核遏制”理论为基础的核政策是基本符合逻辑整合的、明确的、有效的。冷战结束,核武器世界性扩散,美国在防止核扩散方面的双重立场,就成了美国世界战略的“软肋”。不但成为中东、两伊、印巴一线争端不断的最大根源,而且朝鲜更是将其运用到极致。
  小布什的8年几乎都耗费在伊拉克战争上了,根本没有余力对美国在冷战后所应采取的核战略进行全面反省和修正。奥巴马明言要创造“无核世界”,但那只是个远景目标,就连他本人也不会相信在其任内有可能实现。但他认识到走向这一远大目标,必须从根本上考虑修正美国全球核战略。
  美国日前已经将一份题为“为创造无核世界的条件”的决议案分发各理事国,旨在预定于本月24日举行的“有关防止核扩散及缩减核军备安理会首脑级会议” 上通过。可以认为,奥巴马已经动起来了,但是是极为有限的。决议案并未提及美国一直没有放弃的“临界前核试验”。同时,我们还看不到美国对其核双重立场的反省,以及对今后核世界的框架性思考。
  二是比较机宜性地给日本新政权一点儿颜色看看。
  与朝核六方会谈没有直接关系而硬挤进这一会谈的唯一一方就是日本。迄今为止,日本参加六方会谈的唯一目的就是使六方会谈谈不成。因为会谈如果成功,双方关系正常化,日本就要面临解决日朝结束战争状态、道歉、战后赔偿等尴尬。而且一旦日朝关系正常化,日本就会失去增强军事力量的绝好借口。所以,日本一直要把与“朝核”根本不相干的所谓“绑架日本人”问题塞进六方会谈。
  朝鲜很明白,只要解决了与美国的关系正常化,日本就不在话下了。所以对在外交方针一贯追随美国的日本一直爱搭不理。
  但是,日本已“改朝换代”。美国对鸠山企图在外交上“独立”的言论是很不以为然的。日本一贯要求美国在六方会谈和美朝关系上顾忌日本有关“绑架”的立场。而这次美国突然置日本于不顾,也是借时机给日本一个脸色———你要“独立”,我就不管你了!
  值得注意的是,朝鲜几乎同时表明,准备与民主党新政权重开朝日两国“事务级”对话。这在近年是极为罕见的。这表明朝鲜认为,日本民主党政权可能在对朝政策上出现松动。同时也准备一旦美国“不管”日本了,也要把握朝日关系的主动权。▲(作者是日本早稻田大学政经系讲师、中国厦门大学日本研究所客座副教授。)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Topics

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Related Articles

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?