Can Taiwan Purchase Submarines?

Published in China Times
(Taiwan) on 11 December 2009
by Hanbing Xie (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Guangyong Liang. Edited by Alex Brewer.
International media has reported that the U.S. might restart arms sales to the Taiwanese military. Although the report is encouraging for the military, the weapons mentioned are dubious. The report claimed that the U.S. is going to provide submarines to Taiwan; however, America does not currently have the capability to make diesel-electric submarines.

At present, U.S. submarines are completely nuclear-powered. Moreover, the U.S. has not manufactured any new submarines in decades. The source of the arms deal is restricted to the United States, regardless of whether the submarines are made by the U.S. or by another authorized country. The only feasible design available in America is the mackerel-level design from the 1950s, which encompasses several problems. Many of the parts on these submarines are outdated and must be greatly modified. The positive aspect of this is that the submarines can be made in accordance with Taiwan's special requests; the shortcoming is that this alteration equates to almost a complete redesign. With the limited number that our country can afford, not to mention the sky-high price, this is a big gamble that will not pay off until ten or fifteen years down the road.

The other two options are even worse. The ability to acquire Spain’s S-80, given the present international climate, seems hopeless. Purchasing Germany's 214 submarine seemed at first similarly grim, but recently a U.S. website claimed that Greece, who ordered submarines from Germany, has now expressed a reluctance to buy them. In addition, due to budget problems, Germany's navy is unlikely to use these four submarines. There have been rumors that Taiwan could purchase these submarines; there have even been claims reporting that we have dispatched officials to consult with Germany.

However, the situation might not be so optimistic. Although Germany's 214 submarines are more powerful, in terms of attacking power, than the kilo-level submarines made by Russia, Greece’s navy refused to accept them because they have several flaws. We don’t know whether the Greeks are apprehensive about the subs’ noise levels or intense shuddering when they emerge out of water, but they are apprehensive about something. Yet, there is also talk of inadequate funds being the real reason that Greece’s navy did not accept these submarines. Fortunately, Taiwan is unlikely to ignore major flaws that might appear in these submarines.

According to reports, the United States is mentioning all of this again because of the diesel-electrical manufacturers lobby. Due to pressure from lobbyists, the U.S. government will not be happy to see Taiwan purchase submarines from other countries.

Therefore, whether the purchase of submarines is approved, if Taiwan has the ability to buy them and when the army will be confidently established might all be matters that take many years.


國際媒體報導美國可能重啟對台軍售的消息,雖然令軍方相當振奮,但對於這次消息中所提及的武器內容裡,堪稱最重要的潛艦採購案,各方對能否成案意見紛歧,主要的關鍵在於,美國目前並無製造柴電潛艦的能力。

現今美國潛艦完全核動力化,已經數十年沒有製造過潛艦,假使潛艦的來源限定美國,則無論是美造或授權國造,目前唯一可用的設計是1950年代的青花魚級,而且由於此設計很多地方都已經跟不上時代,故原始設計顯然必須大改。好處是可以針對台灣的特殊需求打造,缺點則是一個幾乎等於重新設計的產品,以我國能夠採購的有限數量,價格絕對是超高的天價不說,其「白老鼠」的性質也非常濃厚,真正形成有效戰力,恐怕絕非10?15年內就能達成。

而已經被提到爛掉的另外兩個選擇,西班牙的S-80,以現今的國際局勢,幾乎可說絕無希望。德國的214原來也是如此,但不久前美國網站曾經傳出消息,由於原先向德國訂購四艘214潛艦的希臘,已經表示不願購買,而德國海軍也因預算問題,不太可能自行吸收這四艘潛艦,故一度有傳言說,台灣是這四艘214潛艦的可能買家,甚至有我方已經派員與德國方面接觸的說法。

然而實際上,情況恐怕不會如此樂觀;首先,德國214潛艦雖然號稱攻擊力更甚於目前解放軍所擁有的俄製基洛級,但希臘海軍之所以拒絕接收這批214潛艦,所持的理由就是問題缺陷太多(傳聞多達400項以上),無論是噪音問題,或是浮出水面後過於劇烈的搖晃,都讓希臘海軍無法接受。雖然也有人說,希臘海軍之所以不接收這批潛艇,真正的理由其實是經費困窘所致,但我方顯然不可能就此忽視這批潛艇可能會出現的重大瑕疵。

此外,這次潛艦案之所以會被美國重提,據了解就是美國的柴電潛艦製造廠商積極遊說爭取所致,在這種狀況下,美國政府與民間絕不可能樂見台灣購買其他國家的潛艦,而這個問題恐怕比上述的潛艦瑕疵更難以克服。

所以,無論潛艦採購案是否真的重回軍售序列,是否真的能夠買到?買到後又要何時才能成軍?都還會是非常多年以後的事情。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Switzerland: Ukraine Is No Longer a Priority for America: Trump Leaves the Country High and Dry

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Topics

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Related Articles

Taiwan: 2 Terms Won’t Satisfy Trump

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Taiwan: A Brief Look at Trump’s Global Profit Grab

Taiwan: Taipei Must Act To Soften Trade Blows

  1. not sure if this article was translated properly or the original author is grossly misinformed. the statement that the “US hasn’t built any submarines in decades” is completely wrong. we have been building the consistently over the years and have some now, under construction. Has the author not been informed of the new virginia class submarines? the only thing we haven’t made in decades is the old fashion diesel/electric type most other countries use. but we are definitely making submarines. the author ought to proof read his article on his facts before publishing it