An Important Step for U.S. Financial Regulation

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 11 December 2009
by 刘洪 刘丽娜 (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jamesdon. Edited by .

Edited by Jessica Boesl

The House of Representatives passed the Finance Regulatory Reform Act with 223 votes and 202 vetoes on the 11th of this month. That is Obama's important step forward for the New Deal of finance regulation. If the reform succeeds, the U.S. finance regulation system will be reformed completely.

According to the act, the U.S. will give more power to the regulator of the finance industry to remove those systematic risks that led to the current economic crisis. From now on, operations of merger and acquisition, mortgage releasing, credit evaluation and various financial derivatives all will be regulated by it.

There are two core components of this policy. First, the Federal Reserve Board will be empowered to supervise all enterprises that threaten the stability of finance, including those that do not own banks. The government will establish a Financial Services Supervisory Committee to advise the Federal Reserve Board. That means the Federal Reserve Board will be a main front for U.S. financial regulation.

Then, for market regulation, the New Deal will enforce the supervision of hedge funds and financial derivatives, and make the market more transparent. In response to risks, the New Deal will empower the government to take over some financial giants.

According to Obama's government, there won't be any questions about whether a company is too large to fall. The government can also avoid the so-called moral dilemma while bailing out some financial giants.

The new Consumers Financial Protection Agency will be set up to fully protect consumers' interests. This financial crisis originated from the breaking of the real estate bubble. It is widely believed that the main reason was a lack of effective protection for consumers, which led to the over-loaning of mortgages and other unsuitable financial products consumers could not pay back, and eventually made the crisis much worse.

According to the reform's solutions, the current policies of the Federal Reserve Board, Securities Exchange Commission, Federal Trade Commission to protect consumers will be unified under the newly established Consumers Financial Protection Agency in order to solve the problem of inefficiency and systematic risks.

The New Deal involves every aspect of the financial industry and considers every group's interests. It was publicized this summer and was not submitted to the Congress until the end of this year. Obviously, it's very hard to carry on. At the voting on the 11th, the two parties stood against each other, with all Republicans voting against it. At the subsequent voting in the Senate, the fight is supposed to be even bloodier, so that there is the possibility it will not be passed before the end of this year.

There is opposition to the New Deal primarily for two reasons. Some criticize the super regulatory role of the Federal Reserve Board. As a central bank, the board is powerful enough already in the economic and financial arenas, and, if it is entitled to more supervisory power, there will be bigger systematic risks.

Some financial institutions worry that the newly established Consumers Financial Protection Agency will compromise their profitability and ability to compete, so they are lobbying hard against the clause.

The reform will redistribute power among many supervisory institutions, so those who are deprived are complaining. For example, Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke insists the function of the Federal Reserve Board to protect consumers should not be taken away. While other institutions, the Securities Exchange Commission and federal deposit insurance companies are claiming the Federal Reserve has affected their supervisory functions by holding power solely by itself.

According to the U.S. legislation procedure, the reform solution of financial regulation must be passed by the House of Representatives, the Senate and then endorsed by Obama to formally become a law. For the time being, the financial crisis has not ended and the idea of more strict regulation is shared by all. Obama will probably work hard to promote the New Deal as his top priority.

In the global scope, the loopholes in the U.S.'s financial regulation system harmed other countries badly. It's a popular move for the U.S. to fix these loopholes. However, it's worth mentioning that, as a rule-maker of international financial games, the U.S.'s New Deal will not only change the current rules domestically, but also deeply impact the international financial system.


新华网华盛顿12月11日电(记者刘洪 刘丽娜)美国众议院11日以223票赞成、202票反对通过了金融监管改革方案,这意味着美国总统奥巴马的金融监管“新政”向前迈出了重要一步。如果改革成功,美国金融监管体系将被全面重塑。

根据当天通过的法案,美国将全面加强金融监管机构的职权,清除导致目前危机的各种“系统性风险”。以后无论大型金融机构的运作、并购,还是抵押贷款的发放、信用评级的制定以及各种衍生工具的交易等,都将在被监管之列。

但核心的改革内容有两个。第一,将美国联邦储备委员会打造成“超级监管者”,赋予其监管所有对金融稳定构成威胁的企业、包括不直接拥有银行的企业的权力。美国将成立金融服务监管委员会,为美联储出谋划策。也就是说,美联储将成为美国金融监管的最主要防线。

此外,在对市场监管方面,“新政”将加强对对冲基金、金融衍生品等的监管,增加市场透明度;在危机应对方面,“新政”将赋予政府处理未来危机的新工具,比如可接管金融巨头的权力。按照奥巴马政府的说法,以后将不存在“大得不能倒”的问题,政府也将避免因救助金融巨头而陷入道德困境。

第二,设立新的消费者金融保护署,全面保护消费者的权益。这次金融危机起源于美国房市泡沫破裂。美国各界都认为,正是缺乏对消费者的有效保护,导致消费者负上无力承担的按揭贷款,购买了不适合他们的金融产品,才进而加剧了金融危机。

根据改革方案,美国政府将把目前分散于美联储、证券交易委员会、联邦贸易委员会等机构手中的涉及消费者权益保护的职权,统一集中到新成立的消费者金融保护署,避免政出多门而效果不彰,以此解决此前存在的“系统性风险”。

“新政”触及到金融领域的方方面面,关系到各集团利益的重新调整,从今年夏天“新政”方案公布,到年底方案才在众议院付诸表决,就可见其推进的难度。在众议院11日的投票表决中,两党更是壁垒分明,所有共和党议员都投了反对票。在随后的参议院表决中,外界普遍认为,双方的攻防将更为激烈,今年年底前方案获得通过的可能性不大。

金融监管“新政”遭遇反对,焦点也在两项核心改革内容上。在美联储“超级监管者”的角色上,一些批评者认为,身为央行的美联储在经济金融领域的权力已经太大,现在赋予其更大监管权,可能制造出更大的系统性风险。在新设立的消费者金融保护署上,不少金融机构担心,这会损害它们的盈利空间和竞争力,因此努力游说反对这一条款。

此外,改革让美国原先众多监管机构权力出现消长,一些利益受损机构心存怨言。比如,美联储主席伯南克就认为,不应剥夺美联储保护消费者权益的职权。而其他机构——如美国证券交易委员会、美国联邦储蓄保险公司等,则对美联储大权独揽愤愤不平,认为这影响了它们自己的监管职权。

按照美国的立法程序,金融监管改革方案还须在参议院获得通过并经奥巴马签字方能成为法律。利用当前金融危机尚未完全过去、必须加强监管改革仍是各界共识这一有利时机,奥巴马势必会全力以赴,将推进监管“新政”作为当前执政的一项优先任务。

对全球而言,美国金融监管体系存在的种种漏洞,让世界其他国家深受其害。美国现在亡羊补牢,全面加强监管,自然是一个值得欢迎的举动。更应引起注意的是,作为国际金融规则的一个主要制定者,美国金融监管“新政”势必会使既有规则发生嬗变,并给世界金融体系带来深远影响。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Topics

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands