Members of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress introduced a draft immigration bill that paves the way for the legalization of millions of people living in the northern country. Construction of a road, which does not yet have the support of Republicans, has been restarted.
The third time’s the charm, says the popular adage, and, in spite of the enormous obstacles that will be presented in the debates, expectations have increased for achieving one of President Obama’s campaign promises.
In 2005, the House of Representatives passed a bill against terrorism and illegal immigration, while in 2006 the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform proposal. Neither one succeeded in becoming law, because members of both houses were unable to reconcile their differences in committee in 2007.
The first draft blocked the legalization of undocumented immigrants and established a strong security policy, which included raids, massive deportations, the construction of a fence along the Mexican border, jail for foreigners without legal residence permits and criminalization of undocumented stays.
A second draft included a strong national security component and a path of legalization regulated by fines and requirements, which ranged from returning to one’s home country for a period of at least three years, to knowing English, paying taxes and having no criminal record, among other requirements.
A year later, in 2007, Democrats and Republicans again debated the topic, but ended without resolution in May, due to lack of support by both houses, following a war of amendments to a bill that allowed the legalization of some immigrants.
The contents of the document presented - which also contained the controversial and thorny issue of border security - highlighted, as a first point, the creation of a temporary visa program for a period of six years, which would be a prelude to naturalization for immigrants and their families and bring them closer to obtaining U.S. citizenship.
The papers are on the table, and its sponsors say it is not a question of whether or not to do it, but a “moral obligation" to the millions of people working and performing their civic duties, but who are labeled second-class citizens.
In the meantime, Honduran leaders in the U.S. have begun rapprochement with Congress in attempts to persuade them to extend the term of the Temporary Protected Status that, year after year, has been renewed for the benefit of the 75 Hondurans who entered the U.S. before January 1, 1999. These efforts will help ensure that the issue of Honduran compatriots being allowed to remain in the U.S. will be, from day one, on the new administration’s agenda.
Miembros de la Cámara de Representantes del Congreso norteamericano presentaron un proyecto de reforma migratoria que abre la vÃa a la legalización de millones de personas que viven en el paÃs del norte. Se reinicia el camino que no cuenta aún con el apoyo de los republicanos.
La tercera es la vencida, reza el adagio popular, y pese a los enormes obstáculos que se presentarán en los debates, han aumentado las expectativas en el cumplimiento de una de las promesas de campaña del presidente Barack Obama.
Un año más tarde, en 2007, demócratas y republicanos volvieron a intentar un debate, el que terminó en mayo por falta de apoyo en ambas cámaras luego de una guerra de enmiendas a un proyecto que permitÃa la legalización a algunos indocumentados.
Los papeles están sobre la mesa y sus patrocinadores señalan que no se trata de oportunidad o no, sino de "una obligación moral" con millones de personas que trabajan y cumplen con sus deberes ciudadanos y a los cuales se les etiqueta de segunda o quinta categorÃas.
Mientras tanto, los lÃderes hondureños en Estados Unidos han comenzado los acercamientos con los congresistas para ampliar la vigencia del Estatus de Protección Temporal que, año con año, ha sido renovado para beneficio de 75 hondureños que ingresaron a la nación del Norte antes del 1 de enero de 1999.
Asegurar la estancia de los compatriotas en EUA debe estar, desde el primer dÃa, en la agenda del nuevo gobierno.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.
Stone ... argued that Hernández’s liberation would give renewed energy to the Honduran right wing, destabilize President Castro’s government, and strengthen what he believes to be Trump and the U.S.’ interests in the region.