A New Low for High Finance

Published in Les Echos
(France) on 13 January 2010
by Favilla (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Merl Storr. Edited by Alex Brewer.
We know how the international financial sector plunged the world into crisis, by creating inflated security values that bore only a tenuous relationship with real (or, as they are modestly called, "underlying") share values. A few recent examples show that the sector, operating according to its own peculiar logic, is now also creating problems for the fiscal regulations and civil laws of its host countries.

A former employee of UBS has reported 19,000 clients, who between them had €13 billion worth of secret accounts with the bank, to the American IRS. In return, he was supposed to receive a reward that would leave him financially secure. But because he "forgot" to include one of his principal clients on the list, a Swiss judge has given him a sentence for being an accomplice to fraud. If he had carried on with "business as usual" and kept the whole thing covered up, the Swiss authorities would never have had anything to complain about – but now they are handing him a sentence for having forgotten about just one client. The U.S. Treasury is still rewarding him for having reported all the others.

Another employee, also in Switzerland but this time of HSBC, has given another list of secret bank accounts to the French tax authorities. Officials in Switzerland are accusing the French government of receiving stolen money and have started to wrangle with them over morals. The French Budget Minister, Eric Woerth, neatly summed up his view of the situation with the question, "Who's swindling whom?"

These two episodes lead us to one conclusion. Deceit and hypocrisy in the world of banking have become so normalized that it takes an extraordinarily attention-grabbing crime before anyone even notices the level of general criminality. In this topsy-turvy world, when national governments demand that their laws be respected, the financial sector's response is to accuse those governments of violating financial law.

The financial sector, emboldened by its own attitude, seems to be drawing up a new kind of united front against the legislative policies of governments. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are threatening to leave London if Gordon Brown does not change his mind about the tax on bonuses. We've already had fiscal pollution and the toxic economy, and now the sector is openly attempting to contaminate politics. In this new struggle, the position of Washington will of course be a determining factor. Once again, the ball is in Obama's court.


Nouvelles dérives de la finance

On sait comment la finance internationale a plongé le monde dans la crise, pour avoir créé de fausses valeurs n'ayant qu'un lointain rapport avec les actifs réels, pudiquement appelés « sous-jacents ». Quelques exemples récents montrent qu'elle pose maintenant des problèmes, à travers sa logique particulière, au corps même des lois civiles et fiscales de ses pays d'accueil.

Un ancien employé d'UBS avait dénoncé au fisc américain 19.000 clients titulaires de 13 milliards d'euros de comptes secrets ouverts dans sa banque. Il touchera à ce titre une récompense qui le mettra à l'abri du besoin. Mais comme il avait « oublié » dans sa liste l'un de ses principaux clients, il est condamné par un juge suisse pour complicité de fraude. Les autorités helvétiques, en somme, n'auraient rien eu à redire s'il avait continué à couvrir le secret de tous, « as usual », mais le condamnent pour en avoir oublié un. Le Trésor américain le récompense pour avoir dénoncé tous les autres.

Un autre employé d'HSBC, toujours en Suisse, a communiqué au fisc français une autre liste de comptes secrets. Les autorités locales accusent le gouvernement français de recel, et ont entamé contre lui un bras de fer sur les grands principes. Dans une formule heureuse, Eric Woerth résume quant à lui la situation par la question : « Qui vole qui ? ». De ces deux incidents résulte une constatation : au point de constance où en est venue la dissimulation bancaire, on ne peut plus compter que sur des délits exceptionnels pour débusquer la délinquance ordinaire. Et par une étrange dérive de sens, la finance accuse les Etats de violer sa loi parce qu'ils veulent faire respecter les leurs.

Forte de ses positions, la finance semble dessiner un nouveau front qui conteste la politique législative des Etats. Goldman Sachs et JP Morgan menacent de quitter la City si Gordon Brown ne revient pas sur sa taxation des bonus. Après la nocivité économique et la nuisance fiscale, ce milieu s'essaye ouvertement à la pollution politique… Dans cet autre combat, la position de Washington sera naturellement déterminante. La balle est, encore une fois, dans le camp d'Obama.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Switzerland: Don’t Give Trump the Nobel Peace Prize Now!

Pakistan: No Coalition for Reason

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Topics

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

India: The World after the American Order

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: No Coalition for Reason

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession