The visits to Lima and Tarapoto by James Steinberg, the number two official of the U.S. State Department, came with various messages. One of them is to keep close the two countries that feel the most friendly toward Washington (Bogotá is the other stop on the tour), in a region where the political left is prominent.
Steinberg's detour to San Martín was to formally check on the progress of the crop substitution program that his government financed. Here, the message is that his office preoccupies itself with the subject of drugs. The message was affirmed by his announcement of more visits to the coca territory, as the U.S. had been conducting in the '80s to the '90s.
Steinberg’s presence also tells us that even if Hillary Clinton will reserve herself for large global scenarios, Latin America will see its importance increase by bringing the dedication of U.S. Deputy Secretary Arturo Valenzuela (who recently visited his homeland of Chile) to Steinberg’s attention.
Although, perhaps the visitor has more controversial things to say: The habitual white lie that Washington is not arming Chile, a note of caution in the face of Chinese expansion and the presence of Iran lurking in the neighborhood.
The Latin American politics of Barack Obama in his first year have not been a hit, which is what some specialized analysts have been saying to him in his own city. Their criticism is not so much for the errors that he has committed, but for missed opportunities, which can be translated as lost time. It is certain that this is also being said in respect to his policies regarding other parts of the world.
An analysis by Peter Hakim for El Universal (Mexico) speaks of Obama being blocked on Latin American regional subjects by the Republicans in Congress and of a Latin America that encounters more and more coincidences and discrepancies involving Washington. He referred to things such as bases in Colombia and Cuba, the Organization of American States, and the solution to the coup in Honduras.
Steinberg took office at the beginning of last year with a particularly tough discourse, proposing that friends and associates of the U.S. in the region require from him a “strong and sustained leadership in the region, as a counterweight to governments like those currently in power in Venezuela and Bolivia." For better or worse, his true management since then has been characterized by inaction.
However, his declaration in Colombia that took place a few hours ago had the smell of his original firmness: “It is a strategic relationship and a great alliance not only in the cooperation of security against drug-trafficking and armed groups." Perhaps something more helpful regarding these two topics would be to ease the burden of our crime-infested zones in Peru.
La visita a Lima y Tarapoto de James Steinberg, Nº2 en el departamento de Estado de Hillary Clinton, viene cargada de variados mensajes en la alforja. Uno de ellos es hacer notar la cercanía con los dos países que se sienten más próximos a Washington (Bogotá es la otra escala de la gira) en una región donde es prominente la izquierda política.
El desvío a San Martín es formalmente para cerciorarse de la buena marcha del programa de sustitución de cultivos que su gobierno financia. Pero aquí el mensaje es que su oficina se preocupa por el tema de la droga, lo cual anuncia más visitas políticas al territorio de la coca, como las tuvimos en los años 80-90.
La presencia de Steinberg también nos está diciendo que si bien Clinton va a reservarse para los grandes escenarios mundiales, América Latina verá su status beneficiarse de un upgrade, al pasar de la dedicación del secretario adjunto Arturo Valenzuela (quien acaba de visitar su Chile natal) a la atención de Steinberg.
Pero quizás el visitante tiene algunas cosas más polémicas que transmitir: la habitual mentira piadosa sobre que Washington no está armando a Chile, más algún llamado a la cautela frente al expansionismo chino y la presencia de Irán rondando por el barrio. Algunas frases habrá sobre cómo marcha la ejecución del TLC.
La política latinoamericana de Barack Obama en su primer año no ha sido un hit, y así se lo están diciendo algunos analistas especializados en su propia ciudad. No tanto por errores cometidos, sino por oportunidades desperdiciadas, lo cual se traduce en tiempo perdido. Es cierto que eso también se viene diciendo respecto de otras partes del mundo.
Un análisis de Peter Hakim para El Universal (México) habla de un Obama bloqueado en el tema regional por los republicanos del Congreso y una América Latina que cada vez encuentra más puntos de coincidencia en temas de discrepancia con Washington. Se refiere a cosas como bases en Colombia, Cuba a la OEA o la solución al golpe de Honduras.
Steinberg asumió el cargo a inicio del año pasado con un discurso particularmente duro, planteando que los amigos y socios de EEUU en la región le reclamaban un “liderazgo fuerte y sostenido” que contrapesara gobiernos como los de Venezuela y Bolivia”. Para bien o para mal, la gestión concreta desde entonces se ha caracterizado por la inacción.
Sin embargo su declaración en Colombia hace unas horas tuvo un aroma a su firmeza original: “Tenemos una relación estratégica y una gran alianza no solo en la cooperación de seguridad contra el narcotráfico y los grupos armados”. Quizás algo más de ayuda en esos dos temas aliviaría la carga de nuestras zonas infestadas en el Perú.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[T]he U.S. led postwar order is unravelling. In its place, a contest for influence and legitimacy is gathering pace, with China eager to fill the vacuum.
[I]n a world of interdependence, international cooperation and the strengthening of multilateral institutions will be vital to preventing competition leading to conflict.
Trump’s threat to impose tariffs of up to 25% on Mexican products is one of the silliest and most counterproductive U.S. ideas to stop illegal immigration.