America on the Offensive: Retreat or a New Vietnam?

Published in Ziare
(Romania) on 16 February 2010
by Lucian Lumezeanu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Adriana Iotcov. Edited by .

Edited by Amy Wong

The Americans cannot win the war in Afghanistan. They know this. Instead, they are trying hard not to lose the war. The extensive military operation that American forces started three days ago, together with their NATO allies and the Afghan army, serves a specific purpose: to force Taliban militants into accepting a negotiated compromise, i.e. a political solution.

If they succeed, the U.S. will be able to pull back from this battlefield, which has cost the American people their time, energy and huge amounts of money. Most importantly, it has cost them thousands of lives. If they fail, Afghanistan will become “Obama’s Vietnam.”

Why Can’t They Win?

The U.S. is fighting against an invisible enemy. An enemy that sets up ambushes, plants makeshift bombs on highways or uses suicide attackers who blow themselves up without batting an eyelash and then vanishes. The U.S. did not expect things to be so difficult when it invaded Afghanistan in 2001.

The Islamic Taliban regime had been ousted within a few weeks. Al-Qaeda and bin Laden, who had orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and whom the Taliban had harbored, were decimated and scattered. Since then, many things have changed. First, Bush himself gave radical Islamists the best gift possible: he invaded Iraq, weakening the U.S.’s ability to fight threats. The corruption and inefficiency of the Afghan government also proved helpful for religious extremists. Slowly but surely, the Taliban gained control of approximately a third of the country.

This was in spite of the fact that the U.S. was still sending soldiers, and their allies, whether they were NATO members or not, continued to increase their number of troops as well. Their efforts, however, remained insufficient. The Taliban and other extremist groups, guided by a radical interpretation of Islam, are getting stronger and stronger, financed by drug trafficking and protected by secure refuge places in the tribal areas of neighboring Pakistan. Some of the most important security analysts and military commanders have reached the conclusion that the insurgency cannot be destroyed. It can be beaten, surrounded or diminished, but it cannot be extinguished completely.

Not even NATO has the necessary resources to achieve this, as the Afghan landscape protects the Islamists, and the ultra-conservative mentality of the population keeps their cause alive, not to mention the cultural differences, the accidental NATO attacks against civilians and the fact that many Afghans perceive coalition forces as a threat.

What Would a Quick Retreat Mean?

The Americans do not want to endlessly prolong the war in Afghanistan. They want to withdraw. U.S. public opinion is already against the war. American leaders are also in favor of the withdrawal. They are also concerned with the consequences. It would be suicidal to pull out now, when the Afghan government and army are incapable of taking over.

The Taliban would immediately take charge and become America’s greatest enemy. They would have the bases necessary for attacking the U.S., and they would continue to harbor al-Qaeda. Beyond the fact that the U.S. would tarnish its superpower image, something which would encourage military attacks from all extremist groups, lies one more problem: a state led by radicals would try to obtain a nuclear weapon. This is the most terrible threat that the U.S. national security could face.

How Will They Put the Lessons of Vietnam Into Practice?

It is certain that the Americans want to put the two lessons learned during the Vietnam War into practice. Firstly, they do not want to extend the war forever. Secondly, they want to find a political solution to the war. This time, the U.S. does not want to leave its enemies in charge of a region from where they could attack or in charge of massive armed forces. In other words, they do not want to leave the job half done.

The Americans want to corner Islamic militants and beat them, even though they will not be able to defeat them completely. Then, they want to invite the “moderate Taliban” to participate in the new Afghan government.

The first part is easy. Islamists do not have the military power to fight off the American and European troops. The second part, however, is the most difficult task that the U.S. has undertaken abroad. All in all, “Uncle Sam” will fight with all his might. America’s future as a superpower and the security of the entire planet are at stake.


America in ofensiva - zar de fuga sau un nou Vietnam ?

Americanii nu vor castiga razboiul din Afganistan. Si ei stiu asta. Incearca, in schimb, sa nu piarda. Marea ofensiva militara pe care au declansat-o acum trei zile fortele americane alaturi de aliatii lor din NATO si de armata afgana are tocmai acest rol: sa-i impinga pe militantii talibani la un compromis negociat. La o solutie politica.

Daca reusesc, americanii se vor putea retrage din acest teatru de lupta care le-a consumat timp, energie si multi, multi bani. Dar cel mai important lucru, i-a costat cateva mii de vieti. Daca vor esua, Afganistanul va deveni "Vietnamul lui Obama".

De ce nu pot castiga?

Americanii lupta cu un inamic invizibil. Un dusman care provoaca ambuscade, pune bombe improvizate pe sosea sau trimite atentatori sinucigasi care se arunca in aer fara sa clipeasca. Si apoi dispare. Cand au invadat Afganistanul in 2001, SUA nu stiau ca va fi atat de greu.

Regimul islamist taliban fusese rasturnat in cateva saptamani. Oaspetele lor care comisese atacurile de la 11 septembrie, Al Qaida lui bin Laden, era decimat si pus pe fuga. De atunci, multe lucruri s-au schimbat. Mai intai, Bush insusi a dat islamistilor radicali cel mai bun cadou - a invadat Irakul, slabind capacitatea Americii de a lupta contra amenintarilor. Coruptia si ineficienta noului guvern afgan i-au ajutat de asemenea pe extremistii religiosi. Incet-incet, talibanii au ajuns sa controleze circa o treime din tara.

Asta in ciuda faptului ca americanii au continuat sa trimita militari, iar aliatii lor din interiorul sau din afara NATO si-au suplimentat la randul lor trupele. Insuficient insa. Talibanii si alte grupuri extremiste ghidate de interpretarea radicala a Islamului devin tot mai puternice, hranite de traficul cu droguri si de faptul ca au baze de refugiu sigure, in regiunile tribale si neguvernate ale Pakistanului vecin. Iar cei mai importanti analisti pe probleme de securitate, plus cativa dintre comandantii militari au ajuns la concluzia ca aceasta insurgenta nu poate fi distrusa. Batuta, involtita, diminuata, da. Dar eliminata complet, nu.

Nici macar NATO nu are resursele necesare pentru a face asta, dat fiind relieful afgan care-i protejeaza pe islamisti si mentalitatea ultra-conservatoare a populatiei care le mentine vie cauza. Ca sa nu mai vorbim de diferentele culturale, de atacurile NATO accidentale asupra civililor si de faptul ca multi dintre afgani ii privesc drept agresori.

Ce-ar insemna retragerea grabita ?

Americanii nu vor sa prelungeasca la infinit razboiul din Afganistan. Vor sa se retraga. Deja majoritatea opiniei publice din SUA a trecut in tabara oponentilor razboiului. Si liderii americani vor sa se retraga. Dar nu vor s-o faca oricum. O retragere in acest moment, cand guvernul afgan si armata sa sunt incapabile sa preia sarcina, ar fi sinucidere.

Talibanii ar prelua imediat puterea si ar deveni cel mai mare inamic al Americii. Ar avea baze de unde sa atace interesele americane si ar gazdui in continuare Al Qaida. Dincolo de lovitura de imagine pe care ar primi-o superputerea americana si care ar incuraja orice grup extremist sa li se opuna armat, ar mai fi ceva: radicalii ar avea un stat care ar urmari sa obtina arma atomica. Adica cea mai mare amenintare pentru securitatea nationala a SUA.

Cum aplica lectia Vietnamului ?

Americanii vor sa aplice cu siguranta cele doua lectii invatate in razboiul din Vietnam. Unu: nu vor sa prelungeasca la infinit razboiul. Doi: rezolva pe cale politica razboiul. De data asta fara sa le lase inamicilor o entitate teritoriala de pe care sa atace si forte militare consistente. Cu alte cuvinte, sa nu lase o treaba pe jumatate facuta.

Americanii vor sa ii incolteasca pe militantii islamisti, sa ii bata bine, chiar daca nu vor putea s-o faca decisiv. Apoi, sa ii invite pe "talibanii moderati" sa ia parte la impartirea puterii din Afganistan.

Prima parte e ca si facuta. Islamistii nu vor rezista militar fortelor americane si europene. insa partea a doua e mai greu de realizat decat orice altceva au facut americanii intr-o tara straina. "Unchiu Sam" va forta la maxim, insa. E in joc viitorul de superputere al Americii. si securitatea intregii planete.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Topics

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Related Articles

Romania: Trump Hopes That All American Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq Will Be Repatriated by May

Romania: America’s Allies Might Miss Donald Trump

Romania: Sow the Wind and Reap the Whirlwind

Romania: Dispute between Trump and Macron Renders Trans-Atlantic Relationship Uncertain

Romania: A New Step to Hell: Donald Trump Unilaterally Denounces Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty