Last Friday, the White House announced the nominations for three new diplomatic representatives in the Ivory Coast (Cote d’Ivoire), Yemen, and Colombia. The U.S. Senate still needs to ratify the nominees, but the new American ambassador to Colombia will tentatively be Peter Michael McKinley. Born in Venezuela, raised in Brazil and Mexico, educated at Oxford — where he defended his thesis on Latin American colonial history — and a diplomat in nature, McKinley is leaving his post as the Washington delegate in Peru.
His designation opens up many opportunities. McKinley is the first diplomatic head of government to be sent to our country during Barack Obama’s administration. During his time in Lima, the United States approved and implemented the Free Trade Agreement with this nation and has signed a treaty of military cooperation. These are two of the most critical topics in the current Colombian-American agenda, where the balance for Bogota has not been the favorable one.
It is true that just the designation of a particular diplomat doesn’t constitute the entire foreign affairs policy toward Colombia. However, it does represent an excellent opportunity to strengthen bilateral dialogue and introduce new topics for discussion. McKinley is arriving in Bogota at a time when the Latin American countries are complaining about the lack of interest Washington has displayed toward region since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Worse, the condition of the neighboring alliance, which was forged during the governments of Andrés Pastrana and Álvaro Uribe, is today seen as a disadvantage in the middle of a hostile regional environment. All of this is without counting the previous total reduction in U.S. aid for Plan Colombia.
However, free trade, military and geopolitical treaties are not the only difficult points on the agenda. The judicial cooperation between Colombia and Washington in relation to justice and peace is a highly topical issue that McKinley will receive. The outgoing ambassador, William Brownfield has recently suggested that both countries should merge their judicial systems, so that the errors in the drug trafficking processes and the damages to humanity could simultaneously contribute to justice, to truth and to repairing the damages caused to victims.
Finally, it is not a coincidence that this nomination has happened a couple of months prior to a presidential change in Bogota. With a new ambassador in Bogota, the next government will have a greater margin to maneuver and reinforce its interests, emphasize important matters, and negotiate new areas of diplomatic cooperation.
El viernes pasado, la Casa Blanca anunció las nominaciones de tres nuevos representantes diplomáticos en Costa de Marfil, Yemen y Colombia. Aunque resta la ratificación formal de los nombramientos por el Senado estadounidense, el nuevo embajador de Estados Unidos en Colombia será en poco tiempo Peter Michael McKinley. Nacido en Venezuela, criado en Brasil y México, educado en Oxford, donde hizo una tesis sobre historia colonial latinoamericana, y diplomático de carrera, McKinley viene de encabezar la delegación de Washington en Perú.
Su designación abre muchas expectativas. McKinley es el primer jefe diplomático enviado a nuestro país en lo corrido de la administración de Barack Obama. Durante su gestión en Lima, Estados Unidos aprobó e implementó el Tratado de Libre Comercio con esa nación andina y firmó un acuerdo de cooperación militar. Son, precisamente, dos de los temas más álgidos en la actual agenda colombo-estadounidense y en los que el balance para Bogotá no ha sido el más favorable. Si bien la designación de un delegado diplomático por sí sola no construye política exterior, definitivamente presenta una excelente oportunidad de fortalecer los diálogos binacionales y de introducir nuevos temas de discusión. McKinley llega a Bogotá en momentos en los que los países latinoamericanos se quejan ante el poco interés de Washington en la región desde los atentados del 11 de septiembre del 2001. Y lo que es peor: la condición de cercano aliado que Colombia ha forjado durante los gobiernos de Andrés Pastrana y Álvaro Uribe hoy es vista como una desventaja en medio de un entorno regional hostil. Todo esto sin contar con las previstas reducciones de los montos de ayuda para el Plan Colombia. Pero libre comercio, acuerdo militar y geopolítica no son los únicos puntos difíciles de la agenda. La cooperación judicial entre Colombia y Washington en los casos de Justicia y Paz es un tema candente que McKinley recibe. El saliente embajador, William Brownfield, sugirió hace pocos días que ambos países deberían fusionar sus sistemas judiciales para que, simultáneamente, los fallos de procesos de tráfico de drogas y de lesa humanidad contribuyan a la justicia, la verdad y la reparación de las víctimas. Por último, no es coincidencia que esta nominación se dé a pocos meses de un relevo presidencial en Bogotá. Con un nuevo embajador en propiedad, el próximo gobierno tendrá un mayor margen de maniobra para reforzar intereses, discutir énfasis y negociar nuevas áreas de cooperación diplomática.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.