A Look at America’s Tax, Retirement and Old-Age Pension Systems: Part I

Published in xinhua
(China) on 1 July 2010
by Song Hanwu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Qiuming liao. Edited by Sam Carter.
I am a retired senior engineer from Shanghai Power Equipment Research Institute. I studied in the Czech Republic in the 50s. I retired in 1996, and since 2006 I have visited the U.S. seven times — with each stay lasting between half a year and year — to look after my grandchildren. From a variety of sources — including the Americans around me, my son, local Chinese friends, and American newspapers — I gained some understanding of the tax, retirement, and old-age pension systems in the United States, and I have written this article to share my knowledge with you.

Taxes in America

The Americans regard paying taxes as everyone’s duty. Everybody knows about it and conscientiously follows it. The tax authority in the U.S. is huge and its system is quite perfect.

There are three types of tax revenue in the U.S. current tax system:

The first one is the federal tax. It is the tax collected nationwide. All companies, organizations and individuals must pay federal tax on their earnings. The amount of tax they pay varies from fifteen to forty-five percent of their income. A lower income means a lower tax percentage, and this tax system plays a role in adjusting the gap between the rich and the poor.

The second type of tax is state tax. It is an income tax levied by each individual state, and, consequently, it varies from state to state. But generally it falls somewhere between 5 to 10 percent of the income.

The third type is local tax, which is collected by local authorities. For example, there is property tax, which depends on the size of the house, and the education tax, which has to be paid regardless of whether you have children. These local taxes usually add up to 10 percent of the income, depending on the local authorities. My son has to pay $5000 in property tax and $3500 in education tax each year.

In addition, anyone who purchases goods in any shop must pay consumption tax (except food), which is 7 to 8 percent of the commodity price. It is collected by the shop and then turned in to the tax office.

As we can see from these three types of taxes, higher-income persons have to pay income tax of 50 to 60 percent of their earnings. For ordinary earners, it is normally about 30 percent of their income. An American non-governmental organization, The Tax Foundation, releases statistics each year. In 2000, all taxpayers in America paid an average of 33.8 percent of their income on tax. That is equivalent to 124 days’ earnings in a year. It means that all the income earned from New Year’s Day to May 3 have to be used to pay tax. During this period, you work for the country and the society. From May 4 until the end of the year, you work for yourself, and all your earnings go to your own pocket to feed your family.

Of course, the amount of tax you pay fluctuates each year. So the number of days you work for the country and society are different; in some years it’s 130 days and in other years it’s 120 days. In short, when a person works in the U.S., four months’ salary has to be used for tax, and the remaining eight months’ income is yours alone.
.
At present, every country in the world establishes its own tax system according to its specific national conditions. For example, when I was studying in the Czech Republic, it encouraged child bearing because of a shrinking population. Therefore, the Czechs developed a tax system that encouraged child bearing: young men and women who are still single when they reach the age of 28 have to pay late marriage tax, and married couples who do not have children when they are 31 years old have to pay late childbirth tax. There are similar taxes in some other European countries. In a word, every country in the world should have a tax system where the types and amounts are determined by that country’s situation. Generally speaking, the tax rate in European countries is higher than that of the United States.

To be continued…


美国税收和退休养老制度(一)
我是上海发电设备成套设计研究院的退休职工,高级工程师。50年代曾在捷克留学。 1996年退休后,由于需要在假期照看孙子,从2006年起7次来美,住半年至一年。由于生活在美国人和儿子及华人朋友中间,加上从美国报刊看到的资料,对美国人的税收和退休养老制度有所了解,现发回供参阅:
美国人的税
在美国人头脑中,纳税是每个人应尽义务。这一点人人都非常明确,个个认真执行。美国的税务机构庞大,税务制度相当完善
美国现行的税收可分为三大类:
第一类是联邦税,也就是国家在全国范围内征收的税。任何一个企业、团体、个人,只要有经济收入,都要交纳联邦税。应缴税额为所得收入的15%~45%,收入低的缴税百分率低,收入高的缴税百分率高。这种税收制度起到了调剂贫富差别悬巨的作用。
第二类是州税,这是各州政府收取的税收,因此各州的税率是不同的。一般为所得收入的5%~10%。
第三类是地方税,就是居住地区收取的税收。如房产税(根据所住房子大小交纳税金)、教育税(不管有无小孩读书,都要交纳教育税)等,各地区按具体情况而定,一般为收入的10%。例如我儿子所住的别墅每年要缴房产税$5000美元,教育税每年缴$3500美元。
另外,个人在任何商店购物,还必须同时付物价的7~8%的消费税(只有食品免税),由商店代收,再缴税务局。
综上各类税收,收入多的人,约有50~60%的收入要缴税,普通收入者一般30%收入用来缴税。美国的民间组织《税务基金会》每年作一统计,并公布于众。例如2000年,全美国平均,所有纳税人需有33.8%的收入用来纳税,相当于一年中有124天的工资用来纳税,也就是从元旦开始工作,到5月3日为止,这段时间劳动所得的收入必须全部用来纳税,是为国家和社会而工作;从5月4日开始直到年底,是为自己而工作,所得收入可以平安入袋,养家糊口。
当然,每年交纳的税额上下有波动,因此每年为国家和社会工作的天数有所不同,有些年是130天,另一些年是120天。概括起来,一个人在美国工作,老板给12个月工资,其中有4个月左右的工资需要纳税,其余近8个月的工资可收入囊中。
目前,世界各国都根据自己的国情制订必要的税收制度。例如我在捷克学习时,由于捷克人口不断减少,国家鼓励生育,于是就制定了刺激生育的税收制度:青年男女年满28岁未婚者,需交纳晚婚税;小夫妻满31岁未生孩子,需交纳晚育税。欧洲一些国家也有类似的税。总之,世界各国都要制订一定的税收制度,而税种和税额都是按国情而定。总的来说,欧洲国家的税率较高,美国稍低于欧洲。(待续 宋汉武发自美国)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might