Divergence of U.S. and Europe

Published in Xinhuanet
(China) on 13 July 2010
by Ding Yuenhong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Adelina Wan. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Since the outbreak of the world financial crisis in 2008, the difference in interests and policy between the United States and the European Union has become more apparent. The U.S. and E.U. have different opinions on economic development models, the root cause of the financial crisis, external financial regulation, international monetary policy and the best route to recovery, and they may never reconcile their differences. At the recent G20 Summit in Canada, the U.S. pressed for continuous economic stimulus, while the E.U. wanted to slash deficits. As a result, they have each gone their own way, in the name of so-called “mutual understanding.”

The U.S.-E.U. alliance was formed during the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR, as a foundation of international politics and economic stability for the Western developed countries. With the end of the Cold War, the Eastern European consortium began to diminish, and the “common enemy” as a consolidating element among the West began to lose its function. Overall, the Western European countries put their own national interests ahead of the E.U. relationship. Furthermore, with the unification of Germany and a One-Europe movement, the balance of power between U.S. and Europe has changed. The combined GDP of the E.U. is gradually surpassing that of the U.S. With the disappearance of a mutual threat and the change in the balance of power, it is inevitable that the U.S. and E.U. will discover more conflicts and divergences in policy, despite both having common values and the so-called democratic system. Both the U.S. and Europe suffered in the 2008 financial crisis, at different levels, but it has intensified existing conflict between them.

Economic interest is the major source of conflict between the U.S. and Europe. Both are developed countries with economic development at the same level: their economic and financial bonds are very tight, but their conflict and competition are also increasing. This financial crisis was rooted in Wall Street, making Europe so far the biggest casualty; it also intensifies the competition between the two world currencies, the U.S. dollar and euro. The supreme position of the U.S. dollar is the cornerstone of U.S. power. Since the inception of the euro, its share as a percentage of national foreign reserve has risen from 17.9 percent in 1999 to the current 26 percent, and the euro is now the second largest world currency. The U.S. never stops trying to weaken the euro through foreign exchange, so that the latter cannot establish enough stability to facilitate economic growth of the European nations. Europe is aware of this.

When the financial crisis broke out, the European nations were among the first to criticize the U.S., requesting reform of its existing regulation on international financial institutions. The U.S., however, has tried everything to avoid and evade doing so. At the beginning of this year, the U.S.’s recovery was coming along faster than Europe. The European sovereign debt crisis triggered by Greece was a good excuse for the U.S. to retaliate the criticism. Despite the intrinsic problem of the euro, many U.S. hedge funds intensified the crisis by shorting the euro. American credit rating agencies worsened the situation by downgrading Greece, Spain and Portugal, resulting in the fall of the euro against the U.S. dollar. The E.U. decided to strengthen its regulation on foreign financial institutions. Timothy Geithner, the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, wrote to European Commission officials to express his opposition, openly warning that its regulation on hedge funds and private equity funds is discriminatory towards U.S. companies, and that such regulations may result in the divergence of the two Atlantic coasts. In order to resolve the sovereign debt crisis, under combined pressure from the market and the U.S., Europe has to allow the U.S.-dominated IMF to interfere with the euro, further shaking up the Euro’s reputation.

The European sovereign debt crisis brings the competition between the U.S. dollar and the euro to the public’s attention. The United Kingdom’s Sunday Telegraph has an editorial criticizing the U.S. as the largest currency manipulator in history. The competition between the U.S. dollar and euro never stops; we will have to wait and see how it develops. Such competition will leave a deep impact on the U.S.-European relationship.


美欧关系渐行渐远
2010年07月13日 09:56:43  来源: 解放日报 【字号 大小】【留言】【打印】【关闭】


自从2008年爆发全球金融危机以来,美国和欧盟之间利益和政策分歧日益显现:从经济发展模式到危机产生根源,从国外金融机构监督到国际货币体系政策,从拯救危机举措到“退出”机制实施,美欧都各执一词,争论不休。直至日前在加拿大召开的20国集团峰会上,美国强调应继续刺激经济,欧盟坚持要大力削减赤字,结果只能是在淡化歧见的“共识”下,各自自行其是。

  美欧同盟关系是在美苏冷战时期形成的,是西方发达国家长期主导国际政治、经济秩序的主要依托。冷战结束后,东方集团日渐式微,西方集团“共同面对外部威胁”这一重要粘合剂也随之逐渐失去作用。西方各国普遍将自身国家利益前置于同盟关系。此外,随着德国的统一和欧洲一体化的推进,美欧之间力量对比也发生了变化。欧盟的经济总量逐渐赶上并超过美国。共同安全威胁的消失和力量对比的改变,使得美国同其欧洲盟友之间虽仍有共同价值观和所谓民主政体,但无法避免出现越来越多的利益冲突和政策分歧。始于2008年的全球金融危机不仅使美欧双方都受到程度不同的打击,而且也激化了双方之间的一些固有矛盾。

  尖锐的经济利益冲突是美欧之间存在的众多矛盾的至关重要的一面。美欧同属发达国家,经济发展水平基本上属于同一层次,双方经贸 、金融联系甚为密切,同时摩擦、争斗也越来越多。这次始于华尔街的全球金融危机,使欧盟国家成为最大的受害者,同时也加剧了美元和欧元两大国际货币之间的角力。美元的特殊地位是美国霸权的重要基石。美国从不甘心任何其他货币对美元主导地位可能形成的挑战。欧元从问世以来,它在各国外汇储备中所占比例,从1999年的17.9%上升到目前的26.5%,成为世界上第二大国际货币。对此,美国是耿耿于怀的。它从未停止利用汇率打击欧元,使其难以保持稳定并发挥统一货币对欧盟经济增长的推动作用。欧盟对此心知肚明。
  金融危机一爆发,欧盟国家领导人率先向美国发难,要求改革现行的国际金融机构监管。美国则千方百计地加以搪塞、回避。等到今年初美国经济先于欧洲开始复苏,而由希腊债务问题引发的欧盟国家主权债务危机愈演愈烈,这恰恰给美国“报复”欧盟的机会。这次因债务问题导致欧元遇到前所未见的困境,固然有欧元自身的问题,但种种迹象表明这背后也有美国对冲基金等机构的“趁火打劫”,趁机做空欧元。美国的信用评级机构在欧元面临信誉风险时刻,也火上浇油,将希腊、西班牙、葡萄牙等国的评级调低。这导致欧元对美元的汇率一下子大幅下跌。欧盟为此讨论拟定加强对国外金融机构监管的框架协议。美国财长盖特纳闻讯致函欧盟委员会主管官员表示强烈反对,公然警告欧盟监管对冲基金与私人股本的计划,是对美国公司的“歧视”,可能导致大西洋两岸产生分歧。欧盟为了解决主权债务危机,在市场和美国的双重压力下,又不得不容许由美国主导的“国际货币基金组织”插手欧元区事务,进一步动摇了欧元的信誉。

  欧洲主权债务危机的前前后后,使人们看到这中间实际上贯穿着美元与欧元的一场争斗。英国《星期日电讯报》曾撰文批评“美国是人类历史上最大的货币操纵国”。美欧货币之争迄未止息,今后如何发展,且拭目以待。这场争斗也将会对美欧关系产生深远的影响。(中国前驻欧盟大使 丁原洪)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Germany: Friedrich Merz’s Visit to Trump Succeeded because It Didn’t Fail

Russia: This Can’t Go On Forever*

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Topics

Canada: President Trump, the G7 and Canada’s New ‘Realistic’ Foreign Policy

Taiwan: The Beginning of a Post-Hegemonic Era: A New Normal for International Relations

Canada: Trump vs. Musk, the Emperor and the Oligarch

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Germany: Peace Report 2025: No Common Ground with Trump

Australia: America’s Economic and Political Chaos Has Implications for Australia

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Turmoil in Los Angeles: Key Test of Trump’s Power

Related Articles

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China