What China Can Learn from American Taxpayers

Published in Sohu
(China) on 19 August 2010
by Heng Xiao Jing (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by James Don. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Fifty-three-year-old Jane Alice is one of the poor in Bell, Los Angeles, U.S. She has recently been making a living from collecting and recycling garbage. While sorting through the garbage, she found a payroll of Bell's officials. It read that Mayor Oscar Hernandez's pay was high as $790,000, which is much higher than President Obama's salary, and Sheriff Randy Adams's pay was $460,000, which is $150,000 higher than his Los Angeles peer.

Alice was angry and confused that, while so many in Bell were struggling for a living, the officials took such high payments without any guilt. She took to the street and spoke out. “They are taking more than the U.S. president does, which is obviously too much, and they have betrayed the taxpayers!”*

When the old woman spoke as a taxpayer, we saw an apologetic mayor; he felt ashamed and for the remainder of his term no longer accepted payment. A television station saluted her as the most politically influential recycling woman: “For a country to develop healthily, every citizen must be granted such influence!”* But where does this influence come from? How could it be linked to healthy development for a country? Thinking over those questions is very enlightening for us as we try to understand what it means to be a taxpayer.

The most important supervision is from taxpayers, and civil servants must be responsible to taxpayers. Based on this idea, we see the apology from the mayor and more support from taxpayers. Of course we also see American officials' respect for the protest by taxpayers.

For the time being in China, civil servants and officials are not used to supervision by taxpayers, like the current “ranting one.” When a citizen claimed, “You are paid by taxpayers, and you must be supervised and held accountable,” the civil servant responded, “How am I paid by taxpayers?” So what did we see from the embarrassing contrast? Make no mistake, some civil servants simply lack the awareness of the existence of taxpayers, let alone that they might be supervised by taxpayers.

The story of the old woman protesting against the mayor's high payments taught us a lesson: We should advocate taxpayers' rights and at the same time, considering China's situation, change the phenomenon of disparity between rights and obligations between taxpayers and the government. As the government collects taxes, it must provide services to taxpayers. If taxpayers don't have any say in what the taxes are spent on, or even when the taxes are squandered, then they won't be aware of their status as taxpayers. Citizens are obliged to pay taxes and have the rights to supervise the government's expenditures; the government has the right to collect taxes and is obliged to provide services to and be supervised by taxpayers. In a modern society the foremost point of taxpayers' rights is to contain the government's power and protect taxpayers' own interests.

*Editor’s note: These quotes, while accurately translated, could not be verified.


  今年53岁的简·艾丽斯是美国洛杉矶辖内贝尔市的一位贫民,多年来她一直靠拾荒度日。在整理垃圾的时候,她发现了一张贝尔市官员们的工资单,只见上面清楚地写着包括市长赫尔南德兹高达79万美元(比总统奥巴马的收入还高很多)、警察局局长兰迪·亚当斯达46万美元(比洛杉矶市警察局局长年薪还多15万美元)等人的年薪记录。(《羊城晚报》8月17日)

  面对工资单,愤怒的艾丽斯怎么想也不明白:贝尔市有许多人都像她一样苦苦挣扎求生之时,那些政府官员怎么能心安理得地拿着那么高的薪水!因此,走上街头,以演讲的方式宣传这件事:“美国总统都比贝尔市的那些官员要挣得少,我认为这足以表明贝尔市官员的薪水高得太过分,我们的贝尔市议会已经彻底背弃了对纳税人的责任!”

  当美国拾荒老妇以纳税人的身份出现时,我们看到了市长的道歉行为:在剩余任期内,他因为惭愧而不再领取薪水。而美国哥伦比亚电视台敬称为“最具政治影响力的拾荒妇”,评论说,一个国家想要健康发展,就必须要让任何一位公民都具备这种影响力!这样的影响力来自何处?何以与一个国家的健康发展相关?在笔者看来,深入思考这些问题,对于唤醒我们的纳税人身份意识具有足够的启示意义。

  纳税人对公务员的监督是最重要的监督,公务员应对纳税人负责。正是基于这种常识,我们看到了美国市长的道歉,看到了更多纳税人对美国拾荒老妇的声援。当然,我们也看到了美国官员对纳税人抗议的尊重。

  就当下而言,我国的不少公务员还不适应纳税人的监督,如此前出现的“咆哮哥”。当公民用“你拿纳税人的钱,你就得接受监督和指责”来要求公务员时,这位公务员却说:“我拿什么纳税人的钱?”如此的尴尬对比,让我们看到了什么?可以说,不少公务员眼中根本就没有“纳税人”这一意识,更没有接受纳税人监督的习惯。

  美国拾荒老妇抗议市长高工资,既告诉我们,应张扬属于纳税人的权利,同时,就我国现实来说,应改变在纳税人与政府的关系上存在的权力与义务不对等现象。政府收了税,就必须为纳税人提供各种服务。如果交完税之后,对怎么花这些税款毫无发言权,甚至被贪官污吏们挥霍浪费时,纳税人也无权置喙,那么,纳税人的身份意识就无法树立。公民有交税的义务,也有监督政府如何使用这些钱的权力;国家有收税的特权,但也有为纳税人服务并接受监督的义务。在现代社会中,强调纳税人的权利首要的一点就是制约政府的公权力,维护纳税人自身的权益。(朱四倍)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands