What is a president to do when he is no longer popular in his own country because he cannot provide the economic prosperity that his citizens desire? It’s simple; he goes to New York!
This is what Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did, because he knows very well that the Persians back home are not moved by his verbal attacks against the U.S. and against the existence of the state of Israel. He also knows that they are increasingly disgruntled by the fact that the domestic economy shows no signs of improvement. The people are worried about real problems, not the official propaganda in Tehran.
Until now, every time he participated in the yearly session of the UN General Assembly, American journalists portrayed him as a mere clown who was promoted, tolerated and supported by Iranian Ayatollahs.
This time, however, Ahmadinejad’s public relations team did a very good job. Not only was the Iranian president invited to the most important TV stations, but he was also treated with the utmost grace, as no one asked him the truly important questions.
It was obvious that, for clearly political reasons, President Ahmadinejad had his public image subtly cleaned up. As if the American people could ever forget the fraudulent way in which this insignificant Mahmoud won the last election, his decision to stamp out the protests of the opposition, his irrational statements about removing the state of Israel from the map of the Middle East…
It seemed that all his interviewers, including television legends such as Larry King and Christiane Amanpour, knew nothing about the practice tolerated by the Tehran regime in the 21st century, that women found guilty of certain crimes be buried up to their armpits in the ground and stoned to death by “brave men only”!
On the contrary, the distinguished Iranian guest managed to calmly dominate the TV studios, with his well-rehearsed smiles and absurd perorations on the nonexistence of the Holocaust, the obvious decline of capitalism, the supremacy of the Iranian legal system as compared to the American one (!) and all the things for which the Zionist regime — the Tehran label for the state of Israel — is to blame.
The zenith of these TV performances was his answer to the question of what his response would be if President Obama extended a hand to him. He laughed and replied, “Which hand did he extend? His right hand or left hand?”
And the American viewers were flabbergasted.
Ce face un preşedinte, atunci când nu mai este popular în ţara lui, pentru motivul real că nu asigură conaţionalilor săi prosperitatea economică visată de ei? Simplu. Pleacă la New York!
Aşa a procedat şeful statului iranian, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, care ştie prea bine că persanii de acasă sunt indiferenţi la tiradele sale verbale împotriva S.U.A. şi contra existenţei Israelului, dar din ce în ce mai nemulţumiţi de absenţa unei evoluţii economice interne cât de cât promiţătoare. În termeni reali, nu în cei ai propagandei oficiale de la Teheran.
Până acum, de fiecare dată când participa la sesiunea anuală a Adunării Generale a O.N.U., el era privit de jurnaliştii americani ca un simplu clovn, promovat, tolerat şi susţinut de ayatollahii iranieni.
De data asta, echipa de relaţii publice a lui Ahmadinejad şi-a îndeplinit cu brio misiunea. Nu numai că preşedintele iranian a fost plimbat pe la cele mai importante posturi de televiziune, dar a şi beneficiat de maximum de clemenţă, pentru că întrebările cu adevărat importante nu i s-au pus.
S-a văzut în mod clar că, din raţiuni evident politice, domnul preşedinte Ahmadinejad a fost trecut printr-o subtilă... spălătorie de imagine publică. Asta ca şi cum americanii de rând ar putea uita: modul fraudulos în care acest insignifiant Mahmoud a câştigat ultimele alegeri; decizia lui de a fi reprimate dur manifestaţiile opoziţiei; iraţionalele sale declaraţii privind ştergerea statului Israel de pe harta Orientului Mijlociu...
Parcă mai toţi interlocutorii lui Ahmadinejad, inclusiv teleaşti precum Larry King şi Christiane Amanpour nu ştiau nimic despre practica tolerată de regimul de la Teheran, în plin veac XXI, ca femeile vinovate de te miri ce să fie îngropate în pământ până la subsuori şi să fie lovite cu pietre, „doar de bravi bărbaţi”, până îşi dau sufletul!
În schimb, distinsul invitat iranian domina studiourile TV, cu calm, surâsuri bine exersate şi peroraţiile sale absurde privind inexistenţa holocaustului, declinul evident al capitalismului, supremaţia sistemului juridic iranian faţă de cel american (!) şi vinovăţiile regimului sionist. Ultimele două cuvinte fiind eticheta Teheranului pentru statul evreu.
Apogeul acestei dinamice prestaţii în faţa camerelor TV a fost răspunsul său la întrebarea: „Preşedintele Obama v-a întins o mână, cum îi răspundeţi?” “Care mână – a râs el -, stânga sau dreapta?”
Şi telespectatorii americani au îngheţat.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
Time will tell whether the strategic ambitions of the French-German alliance, including those regarding the European army, will jeopardize the EU's cohesiveness, and especially how much longer they can work together within NATO.