A Nobel for Studies About Market Imperfections

Published in Estadao
(Brazil) on 11 October 2010
by José Paulo Kupfer (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Perola Vieira. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Among the three winners of the 2010 Nobel Prize in Economics announced on Monday, Peter Diamond, 70 — a star at MIT, where he retired just a few months ago — is by far the most renowned. According to many people, he has long been in line for the award.
It is still a good time for awards. Diamond and his colleagues Dale Mortensen, 71, from Northwestern University, and British-Cypriot Christopher Pissarides, 62, from the London School of Economics, won for developing research and theory about imperfections in some markets, notably the labor market.

After September 2008, when the certainties about the efficient operation of markets were hit by an unprecedented crisis — the largest in more than six decades — it makes sense to put the spotlight on studies that attempt to establish the costs and difficulties in its operation, even though these studies follow the logic of efficient markets and conclude, with no surprise, with the relative merits of deregulation and do not form a consensus in the academic community.

Adept in "behavioral economics" — an approach of economics with psychology, which earned a Nobel Prize for Daniel Kahneman and Vernon Smith in 2002 — and an expert in welfare policies, Diamond was part of the group of economists who advised the Chinese government in reforming its social security system in 2004. Afterward, he devoted himself to issues in the area of tax policy. Recently, he became interested in monetary policy.

This recent interest wasn’t enough for his nomination to a position at the Federal Reserve Board to be approved by the Senate. The nomination, made by President Barack Obama at the beginning of the year, was returned to the White House and resubmitted by Obama in September. It should be reviewed when the congressmen come back from the recess for the legislative elections this year.



Um Nobel para estudos sobre imperfeições de mercado
Da trinca ganhadora do Prêmio Nobel de Economia de 2010, anunciado nesta segunda-feira, Peter Diamond, 70, estrela do MIT, de onde se aposentou há apenas alguns meses, é de longe o mais reputado. Segundo muitos, estava há tempos na fila.
Não deixa de ser um bom momento para a premiação. Diamond e seus colegas Dale Mortensen, 71, da Northwestern University, e o cipriota-britânico Christopher Pissarides, 62, da London School of Economics, venceram pelo desenvolvimento de pesquisas e teorias a respeito de imperfeições em determinados mercados, notadamente o mercado de trabalho.
Depois de setembro de 2008, quando as certezas sobre a atuação eficiente dos mercados foram atropeladas por uma crise sem precedentes em mais de seis décadas, faz sentido colocar sob holofotes estudos que procurem estabelecer os custos e as dificuldades de seu funcionamento. Mesmo que esses estudos obedeçam à lógica dos mercados eficientes e concluam, sem surpresas, pelas vantagens relativas das desregulações. E não sejam uma unanimidade na comunidade acadêmica.
Adepto da chamada “economia comportamental” – uma aproximação da economia com a psicologia, que já rendeu um Nobel a Daniel Kahneman e Vernon Smith, em 2002 – e especialista em políticas previdenciárias, Diamond fez parte do grupo de economistas que assessorou o governo chinês numa reforma do seu sistema de seguridade social, em 2004. Dedicou-se depois a temas na área de política tributária. Recentemente, passou a se interessar por política monetária.
Esse interesse mais recente não foi suficiente para que sua indicação a um cargo no Federal Reserve Board fosse aprovada pelo Senado. A indicação, feita pelo presidente Barack Obama no primeiro semestre, foi devolvida à Casa Branca, sendo reapresentada por Obama em setembro. Deverá ser reapreciada na volta dos parlamentares do recesso para as eleições legislativas deste ano.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons

Colombia: US Warships Near Venezuela: Is Latin America’s Left Facing a Reckoning?

Germany: Learn from Lula

Brazil: Americans Freely Voted Against Democracy