This is the most symbolic race of the midterms, one in which the Republicans, with Karl Rove in the lead, have heavily invested: Harry Reid, the Democratic leader of the Senate, against Sharron Angle, the Ma Dalton of the tea party (She is 20 years older than Sarah Palin and Christine O'Donnell, and doesn't have quite the same style).
In the third quarter, Sharron Angle has collected a record $14 million! The Republican Party hopes to dampen spirits by striking down the Democratic Senate leader.
Last night, Sharron's campaign headquarters were deserted. The candidate plans to spend the day "at her hotel working," her staff said. She was also in Washington last week to "become prepared." The ex-boxer Harry Reid is waiting in the ring tonight for their only debate of the campaign.
A survey of the Las Vegas Review Journal (which, indeed, has called on people to vote for her) put her in the lead by two points. She tried to "refocus" her message, but Harry Reid's campaign leaflets include a list of "Sharron Angle's dangerous ideas":
— Idea 4: dismantle the Department of Education, Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency.
— Eliminate Medicare and pensions (gradually)
— Leave the UN
— A ban on abortion even in the case of rape (that would interfere with "God's plan"
In his ads, the Democrat features Republicans who explain the extent to which Sharron Angle has “wild ideas.”
A fraction of the Republican Party has preferred to support Harry Reid. Sharron Angle's case foreshadows the split that is threatening the conservative party in some areas.
Sharron Angle contre Harry Reid
C’est la course la plus symbolique des mid-terms, celle pour laquelle les républicains, Karl Rove en tête, ont lourdement investi: Harry Reid, le chef de file démocrate au Sénat contre Sharron Angle, la Ma Dalton des Tea Parties (Elle a 20 ans de plus que Sarah Palin et Christine O’Donnell, et pas tout à fait la même allure).
Au troisième trimestre, Sharron Angle a collecté la somme record de 14 millions de dollars ! Le parti républicain espère frapper les esprits en faisant tomber le leader démocrate du Sénat.
Au siège de campagne de “Sharron” hier soir, tout était désert. La candidate a prévu de passer la journée “à son hôtel à travailler ses dossiers”, a dit le staff. Elle était à Washington la semaine dernière, aussi pour se “préparer”. L’ex-boxeur Harry Reid l’attend ce soir sur le ring : leur unique débat de campagne.
Un sondage du Las Vegas review Journal (qui a, il est vrai, appelé à voter pour elle) la donne en tête de 2 points. Elle a essayé de “recentrer” son message mais les brochures de Harry Reid ont fait la liste des “idées dangereuses de Sharron Angle”:
- Idée 4: démanteler le département de l’éducation, de l’énergie et l’agence de protection de l’environnement.
- Eliminer Medicare et les retraites (progressivement)
- Quitter les Nations Unies
- Interdire l’avortement même en cas de viol (cela contrarierait le “plan de Dieu”)
Dans ses publicités, le démocrate montre des républicains qui expliquent à quel point Sharron Angle a “des idées extrêmes”.
- “Wild ideas”
Une fraction du parti républicain a préféré appeler à voter pour Harry Reid. Le cas de Sharron Angle préfigure la scission qui menace dans certaines régions le parti conservateur.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
Sarah Palin is 14 years younger than Sharron Angle, while Christine O’Donnell is 20 years younger than Angle. Many people do not realize O’Donnell is 41, thinking she is much younger. And many don’t realize that Sarah Palin is 47.
Sarah Palin is 14 years younger than Sharron Angle, while Christine O’Donnell is 20 years younger than Angle. Many people do not realize O’Donnell is 41, thinking she is much younger. And many don’t realize that Sarah Palin is 47.