Egypt’s Military or the United States’?

Published in brasildefato
(Brazil) on 2 March 2011
by Eduardo Sales de Lima (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Gabriel Floud. Edited by Jade Moyano.
Because of the agreement with Israel, the Egyptian military receives almost $1.3 billion annually.

The Egyptian people are living in a hopeless situation. Their provisional government is made up of a military junta that has Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the Minister of Defense, as its principal leader. Specialists, like the sociologist Lejeune Mirhan, consider him to be another American puppet.

The Egyptian military, despite being respected by the population and having supported the popular demonstrations, suffers from a relationship of domination by Washington. Ever since the signing of the Peace Treaty with Israel in 1979, the United States has assisted Egypt militarily with an amount around $1.3 billion per year.

Incidentally, what happened after Hosni Mubarak’s fall was symptomatic. The Armed Forces of Egypt transmitted a message saying that all international agreements will be kept. Or rather, the peace agreements with Israel and the peace agreements with the United States, above all, stand strong. “Since 1979, those guys can’t do without that money; it goes directly to them, to that group of leaders, that military establishment,” says the sociologist Lejenue Mirhan, ironically.

The continuity of that “benefit” after the revolution will sound strange, to say the least, to the people who spent days in Tahrir Plaza. “During Mubarak’s era, the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces always gained a lot from the United States’ support of the regime. The fear is that the same Mubarak regime continues to exist,” explains Arlene Clemesha.

The relationship of control that Washington has over the Egyptian military, which really counted in Mubarak’s fall from a point of view of international pressure, was an act of the United States. For Virgilio Arraes, Professor of International Relations at the University of Brasilia, Mubarak’s fall occurred, above all else, because of his inability to keep the country stable, which is the most important factor for the Americans.

(Renato Godoy de Toledo and Luís Brasilino collaborated on this piece)


Forças armadas do Egito ou dos EUA?
qua, 2011-03-02 12:16 — admin
Internacional


Por acordo com Israel, militares egípcios recebem anualmente quase 1,3 bilhão de dólares



02/03/2011



Eduardo Sales de Lima

da Redação



O povo egípcio vive uma situação de desespero. Seu governo provisório é formado por uma Junta Militar, que tem como principal chefe, Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, ministro da Defesa, considerado por especialistas, como o sociólogo Lejeune Mirhan, mais um fantoche estadunidense.

Os militares egípcios, apesar de respeitados pela população e de terem apoiado as manifestações populares, sofrem de uma relação de dominação por parte de Washington. Desde a assinatura do Tratado de Paz com Israel, em 1979, os Estados Unidos passaram a auxiliar militarmente o Egito com uma quantia em torno de 1,3 bilhão de dólares por ano.

Aliás, o que ocorreu após a queda de Hosni Mubarak foi sintomático. As Forças Armadas do Egito emitiram uma nota dizendo que estão mantidos todos os acordos internacionais. Ou seja, os acordos de paz com Israel e os acordos de paz com os Estados Unidos, sobretudo, estão de pé. “Desde 1979 não dá para os caras prescindirem desse dinheiro, que vai direto para eles; para essa cúpula, esse establishment militar”, ironiza o sociólogo Lejeune Mirhan.

A continuidade desse “benefício” após a revolução soará no mínimo estranha ao povo que passou dias na Praça Tahir.“O Conselho Supremo do exército sempre se beneficiou muito durante a época de Mubarak com o apoio estadunidense ao regime. O receio é que continue havendo o mesmo regime de Mubarak”, explica Arlene Clemesha.

Por toda essa relação de controle por parte de Washington sob o exército egípcio, o que contou mesmo para a queda de Mubarak, sob o ponto de vista da pressão internacional, foi a ação dos Estados Unidos. Para Virgílio Arraes, professor de Relações Internacionais da Universidade de Brasília (UnB), a queda de Mubarak se deu sobretudo devido a sua incapacidade de manter o país estável, fator primordial aos estadunidenses. (Colaboraram Renato Godoy de Toledo e Luís Brasilino)

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Bagram Absurdity*

   

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Taiwan: Can Benefits from TikTok and Taiwan Be Evaluated the Same Way?

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Related Articles

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons

Colombia: US Warships Near Venezuela: Is Latin America’s Left Facing a Reckoning?

Germany: Learn from Lula