For the moment, it’s impossible to know if there will be American bombers in the military intervention in Libya, which American journalists are now calling “Sarko’s War.”
The New York Times affirms this question. The paper adds that it is Hillary Clinton who succeeded in wresting the decision from Obama when she included the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia in the coalition.
Barack Obama gave the green light to American participation in the intervention, but for a duration covering “days, not weeks.”
It is unusual for the United States to be in a supporting role in an international coalition, as was the case in Liberia.
According to press reports, the Americans will furnish AWACS, planes equipped with communication-jamming equipment, tankers, drones and radar planes to control the airspace.
In spite of everything, Barack Obama wants limited American participation. He gave Gadhafi his ultimatum in the East Room (not the Oval Office) and then left for Brazil with Michelle and the children.
Impossible de savoir pour l’instant s’il y aura des bombardiers américains dans l’intervention militaire en Libye (que les journalistes américains appellent désormais la “Sarko’s war”).
Le New York Times assure que oui. Le journal ajoute que c’est Hillary Clinton qui a réussi à arracher la décision d’Obama lorsqu’elle a attiré les Emirats et l’Arabie Saoudite dans la coalition.
Barack Obama aurait donné son feu vert à la participation américaine dans l’intervention mais pour une durée qui devrait se compter “en jours, pas en semaines”.
Il est rare que les Etats-Unis soient en second role dans une coalition internationale (ça avait été le cas au Liberia).
Selon la presse, les Américains vont fournir des AWACS, des avions équipés de matériel de brouillage des communications, des ravitailleurs, des drones, des avions radars pour le controle aérien ..
Malgré tout, Barack Obama veut une participation américaine limitée. Il a lancé son ultimatum à Kadhafi dans l’East Room (et non le Bureau Ovale) et il est parti pour le Brésil avec Michelle et les enfants.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[The Democrats] need to find a campaign issue which will resonate beyond their liberal-metropolitan heartlands before the midterm elections in the fall of 2026.
[T]he president failed to disclose that subsidies granted by his government — in connivance with the Republican Party — artificially maintain the viability of fossil fuels.
In [Weiss'] articles, she attacked the alleged excesses of the left, criticized the 2017 Women's March against Trump and described intersectionality as a new caste system.
Machado’s Nobel Prize is even more significant in light of recent U.S. military actions near Venezuela...A Nobel Prize that rewards peace should be viewed as a warning against military overreach.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.