A common rule in espionage says that you should not write a report that has original conclusions and talks about new things. You risk not being believed by anyone. Instead, if you discuss things that most everyone knows, you have every chance of being believed.
There is, however, a limit. Even if, officially, you are an Embassy official and not a spy, you are supposed to communicate more substance than a press release. However, from all the cablegrams intercepted by WikiLeaks in Romania, it becomes apparent that the US Embassy staff did not try in any way to find anything of substance, and instead limited themselves to reading only newspapers and sending on what they found out. Other cables showed, however, that there was no need for the American diplomat’s best endeavors.
Romanian politicians were happily giving any report that the Americans wanted. Vasile Blaga casually discussed the electoral strategy of PDL with the Americans. Then he would inveigh against the liberals, as if they were talking with friends over beer. Mircea Geoana did not talk as much with the ambassadors as much as he listened to them. Criticized for allegedly plotting the suspension of the “pro-american Basescu from CSAT,” Geoana was hurrying to appease the President of Romania without the party’s knowledge and then bragged about it to the embassy. The most talkative Romanian politician appears to be Georgian Pop, a self-described “Deep Throat” in reference to the Watergate scandal informant.
Correctly classified by the Americans as a “rising star,” Pop didn’t even have the common sense to gossip about power. He would chop up his own. He would cry on the ambassador’s shoulders that he shares the party with the corrupt Adrian Nastase, assuring the Americans that all that Geoana says is a joke, deploring the fact that the only intelligent people in PSD (the political party from Cluj) did not get votes, and in reference to one of the other “rising stars” of the party, Victor Ponta, he reckoned with disgust that “he barks needlessly, no one is paying attention.” Other reports prepared by the papers and sent out by Wikileaks show that the Americans watched with condemning eyes the lack of transparency in Romanian politics. However, the voters feel this lack of transparency. In front of American diplomats, it appears that our politicians do not know how to keep their mouths shut.
O regulă de bun simţ a spionajului spune că nu te apuci să faci un raport ale cărui concluzii sunt originale şi vorbesc de lucruri noi. Rişti să nu fii crezut de nimeni. În schimb, dacă vorbeşti de lucruri pe care mai toată lumea le ştie deja, ai toate şansele să fii crezut.
Există, totuşi, o limită. Chiar dacă, oficial, eşti funcţionar de ambasadă şi nu spion, ar trebui să comunici mai departe ceva mai mult decât revista presei. Or, din toate cablogramele interceptate de Wikileaks din România, asta reiese. Stafful Ambasadei SUA nu se obosea în niciun fel, se rezuma doar să citească ziarele şi să trimită mai departe ceea ce aflau. Alte cablograme arată însă că nici nu era nevoie ca diplomaţii americani să-şi dea silinţa. Politicienii români le dădeau bucuros orice fel de raport ar fi dorit. Vasile Blaga discuta cu lejeritate despre strategia electorală a PDL cu americanii. Apoi îi făcea cu ou şi cu oţet pe liberali, de parcă ar fi stat de vorbă cu amicii la bere. Mircea Geoană nu atât vorbea cu ambasadorul, cât asculta de acesta. Criticat pentru că ar fi pus la cale o suspendare a "pro-americanului Băsescu din CSAT", Geoană se grăbea să îl îmbuneze pe preşedintele României fără ştirea partidului şi să se laude apoi cu asta la ambasadă. Cel mai vorbăreţ politician român pare să fi fost, însă, Georgian Pop, poreclit "Deep Throat" în amintirea informatorului din scandalul Watergate. Catalogat de americani drept "o stea în ascensiune", Pop nu avea nici măcar bunul simţ de a furniza bârfe despre putere. Îi toca mărunt pe ai săi. Plângea pe umărul ambasadorului că împarte partidul cu Adrian Năstase cel corupt, îi asigura pe americani că tot ce zice Geoană este la mişto, căina faptul că singurii oameni inteligenţi din PSD (grupul de la Cluj) nu obţin voturi, iar în privinţa celeilalte "stele în ascensiune" a partidului, Victor Ponta, opina cu lehamite că "latră degeaba, nu-l bagă nimeni în seamă". Alte rapoarte întocmite cu ziarele în
faţă şi scoase apoi la iveală de Wikileaks arată că americanii priveau cu ochi răi lipsa de transparenţă din politica românească. Lipsa de transparenţă o resimţeau, însă, alegătorii. În faţa diplomaţilor americani, se pare că politicienii noştri nu-şi mai puteau pune stavilă la gură.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
Time will tell whether the strategic ambitions of the French-German alliance, including those regarding the European army, will jeopardize the EU's cohesiveness, and especially how much longer they can work together within NATO.