Mutual Consent in Fitch’s Lowering of the US Debt Rating?

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 2 December 2011
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jeffrey King. Edited by Mark DeLucas  .
Fitch Ratings, one of the three main international global rating agencies, recently issued a statement announcing that it will lower its forecast of the U.S. sovereign debt rating to negative. Fitch declared that if the U.S.is unable to reach an agreement to effectively lower its debt, they will lower the U.S.'s AAA sovereign credit rating.

At present, Standard & Poor’s sovereign credit rating for the U.S. is AA+ with a negative forecast. Moody’s sovereign credit rating for the U.S. is AAA and also with a negative forecast. Everyone is worried about the same thing: Will the U.S. government ever be able to solve its debt problem?

It’s common knowledge that the initial shock from the breakout of the financial crisis was mostly felt by market participants like companies and financial institutions. However, with the deepening of the crisis and the constant launching of measures designed to combat the crisis, in the end, the problem always shifts back to the government. The European debt crisis was like this, and the U.S. debt problem is even more like this. How then to view Fitch’s lowering of the forecast for America’s debt rating?

The U.S. government has always used new debts to pay off old ones, a means that has become more prominent after the breakout of the financial crisis. During that time, the subprime mortgage crisis was set to go off at any minute, leading, when it did, to the collapse of several financial organizations. The outlook for economic growth was quite dismal. In order to prevent the crisis from developing any further, even the U.S., which has always advocated the market-adjusting mechanism of the “invisible hand,” was forced to use the “visible hand” of the government to save those institutions most in danger and to stimulate the economy through the active use of financial measures. Aiding and spurring the economy cannot be done without spending large amounts of money, therefore a surpassing of the debt ceiling by the U.S. government is to be expected.

From this perspective, the warning delivered by the rating agencies was inevitable, but since this bad news has been anticipated by the market, it will not necessarily have many negative impacts on the U.S. Rather, the author believes that, in this, there is a certain degree of willingness on both sides; one is willing to beat the other while the other is willing to be beaten. In short, Fitch’s lowering of the U.S. credit outlook is not necessarily a bad thing for the U.S, but in some sense might actually be a good thing.

In reality, the U.S. debt problem has never been solely an American problem. It is a problem for the other countries of the world. The reason lies in the U.S. dollar. If the U.S. cannot repay its debts, it prints money to repay them. However, there is another disguised means of money printing that is simpler and more covert: to let the American dollar depreciate. From the perspective of having a beneficial effect on increased exports, a weak U.S. dollar is more in tune with U.S. interests.

Recently, the trend of the U.S. dollar has been very strong. Looking at the foreign exchange markets, it is easy to see that ever since the eurozone economy slipped into a debt crisis and left the economic outlook dim, the exchange rate of the euro has continuously weakened against the dollar. Not only that, but the U.S. Dollar Index has continued to rise gradually, reaching a high of 80. As a result, Fitch’s “light tap” on the U.S. debt problem will stimulate a fall of the dollar, which, from one perspective, might thrust the it into a position more favorable to U.S. interests.

Therefore, the continual expansion of debt risks for the main countries of the world will cause panic among investors, but bad news is not necessarily something that everyone dislikes. Behind every piece of bad news, there is always someone who gains. From the fund groups involved in short selling the U.S. dollar to the U.S. government hoping to rely on the depreciation of the dollar to reduce the debt, there are many parties positioned to make gains from this bad news.

So what does this news mean for China? Regardless of whether the U.S. government’s debt crisis continues to worsen or whether the U.S. dollar weakens over the long term, this news is something that China, as a holder of so much American debt, does not want to hear. If the dollar weakens and the Yuan appreciates, this will benefit American exports but will harm Chinese exports. Additionally, 16 of the 21 American debt primary dealers polled by Bloomberg believed that the U.S. Federal Reserve has already prepared to launch a new round of quantitative easing measures that will buy mortgage securities as a means of pouring more capital into economic development. The quantitative easings are already at the point of no return. Is this good news or bad news?


国际三大评级机构之一的惠誉日前发表声明,宣布将美国主权债务评级的前景下调至“负面”,惠誉警告称,如果美国国会无法达成有效减赤方案,他们将在2013年下调美国A A A主权信用评级。

  目前,标普给美国主权信用评级为A A +,前景展望为“负面”;穆迪的评级为A A A,前景展望为“负面”。大家担忧的理由是一致的———美国政府的债务问题究竟能不能得到解决。

  可以说,金融危机爆发初始受到冲击的总是企业、金融机构等市场参与者,但随着危机的深化和应对危机的措施不断出台,最终又总会转移到政府身上。欧债危机如此,美国更是如此。那么如何看惠誉下调美债评级的前景呢?

  美国政府向来是用新债还旧债,而且这种模式在金融危机后变得更为显著。次贷危机一触即发,一批金融机构被击垮,经济增长前景黯淡无光。为了不至于引发更大的危机,连一向倡导“看不见的手”的市场调节机制的美国也不得不运用政府这只“看得见的手”来救这些机构于水火之中,并且积极运用财政手段来刺激经济。救助和刺激计划不可能不大把花钱,美国政府突破债务上限也在情理之中。

  如此看来,评级机构警告美国是早晚的事,坏消息由于在市场的预期之内,对美国来说未必有多少负面的影响,甚至笔者认为,其间未必没有周瑜打黄盖———一个愿打一个愿挨的意思。总之,惠誉下调美国的评级展望,对美国而言未必是坏事,可能还是另一种形式的“好”。

  实际上,美国的债务问题向来不仅仅是美国的问题,也是全世界其他国家的问题。原因就在于美元,美国实在还不起债,可以印钞票还债。而另一种变相印钞票的方式可能更为简单而隐蔽,那就是让美元贬值。而且,从有利于增加出口的角度来讲,弱势美元也更符合美国的利益。

  最近,美元的走势非常强劲。观察汇市不难看出,由于欧元区经济深陷债务危机泥潭,区内经济前景一片灰暗,欧元对美元汇率一直在走弱,而反观美元指数则节节攀升,直至80的阶段性高点。所以,惠誉此次这么“轻叩”一下美国的债务问题,对美元是利空,但从另一个方面说,也可能会助推美元朝更有利于美国利益的方向走。

  所以说,全球主要国家政府债务风险在不断扩大会引发投资者的恐慌,不过,坏消息未必谁都不喜欢,在坏消息的背后,总有人获利,小到本身就在做空美元的基金,大到期望靠美元贬值来消减债务的政府。

  那么,对中国而言,这则消息又意味着什么呢?不论是美政府债务问题继续发酵,或是美元长期弱势,那一定是重仓持有美国国债的中国外储所不愿意听到的消息。而且,若美元走弱,人民币相对升值,对美国出口有利的同时,对中国出口自然不是好事。况且,接受彭博调查的21位美国国债一级交易商中有16位认为,美联储已准备启动新一轮的量化宽松措施,将通过购买按揭证券为经济发展注入资金,Q E3眼看又“箭在弦上”。这究竟是好消息还是坏消息?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump’s Words and Putin’s Calculus

India: Peace Nobel for Trump: It’s Too Long a Stretch

Egypt: The B-2 Gamble: How Israel Is Rewriting Middle East Power Politics

Canada: Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Hurt Canadians

Palestine: Ceasefire Not Peace: How Netanyahu and AIPAC Outsourced Israel’s War to Trump

Topics

India: Peace Nobel for Trump: It’s Too Long a Stretch

Ecuador: Monsters in Florida

Austria: It’s High Time Europe Lost Patience with Elon Musk

Singapore: The US May Win Some Trade Battles in Southeast Asia but Lose the War

Ethiopia: ‘Trump Guitars’ Made in China: Strumming a Tariff Tune

Egypt: The B-2 Gamble: How Israel Is Rewriting Middle East Power Politics

China: 3 Insights from ‘Trade War Truce’ between US and China

United Kingdom: We’re Becoming Inured to Trump’s Outbursts – But When He Goes Quiet, We Need To Be Worried

Related Articles

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle