Competition in American Society Seen Through the Long Island SAT Cheating Incident

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 7 December 2011
by Yu Shiyu (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Peter Nix. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Despite grassroots level anti-elitism, Romney and Gingrich, who are increasingly dominant in the Republican Party primary race, are both out-and-out members of the intellectual elite. Romney is considered to be the most likely winner. As such, no matter who wins next year’s election, the White House will continue to house a Harvard alumnus.

On the other hand, since the “Occupy Wall Street” movement began, polarization has become a popular topic of American conversation. Regardless of how wealth is distributed, The National Review and other such representatives of conservative popular opinion have begun to acknowledge the inequality of social opportunity. The New York Times and the Washington Post have stressed that upward mobility among the members of the American lower class has fallen behind countries such as Germany, France, Canada, etc. The root cause of this phenomenon lies in the differentiation of educational opportunities in America: The children of the poor remain poor mainly because of their low level of education.

That the intellectual elite continue to control America’s “superstructure” shows that the social status of the next generation of America’s middle class lies not in the inheritance of wealth, but in obtaining a good education, especially the opportunity for an elite education. Last year “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother” aroused unprecedented controversy, especially since afterward the eldest daughter of the “Tiger Mother” was admitted to Harvard and other prestigious schools; it touched a nerve with the competition anxiety of the middle class.

The test culture of China and other Asian countries, and above all the “one test determines a lifetime” college entrance exam, have encountered a fair amount of social criticism. It was scarcely imagined that America also had a deep seated college entrance exam culture, which gave birth to a “test prep” industry worth upwards of several billion dollars per year. My new book about entrance strategies for prestigious American universities, “Realizing the Harvard Dream,” published by the Beijing Zhonghua Book Company, addresses this topic. However, amidst the annual college application year-end deadline craze, the Long Island SAT cheating incident exposed several months ago is growing more and more important, and has pushed the American College entrance exam craze to an unprecedented height.

The Scandal isn’t an Isolated Case

The gist of this case is that with America’s highly standardized SAT and ACT college entrance exams, many high school students hire “hired guns” to take the test for them and earn a high score. When the case first became public, people thought that it was just an internal, rare and isolated incident at one Long Island high school. But now, several months later, more and more cases are being exposed. Tens of students from many different schools and school districts are involved — and this may be just the tip of the iceberg.

Just like the “Tiger Mother” controversy, this cheating case has been closely followed by America’s elite media, from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal to every major TV network. This is because, not only has this fraud broken the rules of “fair play,” it is also directly reflected the future socioeconomic opportunities for the next generation of the upper and middle class. New York State Senator and Chairman of the Senate’s higher education committee Kenneth LaValle revealed the seriousness of a case of fraud like this: “[The SAT] will determine the course of their life.”

On a certain level, the effect on society of America’s college entrance test culture is even more extreme than China’s. For example, every school district’s average SAT score directly influences the rise and fall of local real estate prices. The above mentioned “path of life” implication is even more striking. This is because, with an emphasis on “comprehensiveness,” SAT and ACT scores are an important factor in applications to American universities, including Ivy League universities. Extensive survey results indicate that a student’s future opportunities for social success are highly correlated to the reputation and ranking of the university he/she attended. Besides the fact that Wall Street is full of Ivy League students, Atlantic Monthly approached this issue from a financial angle and revealed a strong relationship: Several years after graduating, the average yearly income of students from the best few universities is higher than that of two-thirds of the graduates from the school ranked 50th.

The price of having a “hired gun” take the SAT for a student is reported to be between $2,500 and $3,500, definitely not a sum that lower class families can afford, and as an ex-state representative pointed out, not a high school student’s allowance, either. Therefore, the parents of the students involved must have known what was going on. The district in Long Island where this case occurred is full of rich and intellectual elites and is a gathering place for those of Asian and Jewish descent. The competition to get into prestigious schools is particularly fierce. The schools where known cases have occurred include not only “elite” public high schools, but also private prep schools. The cheaters revealed so far include an Iranian-American and a Jewish American, but so far there are no ethnic Chinese.

One hired gun revealed thus far had scores are between 2140 and 2220 points (out of 2400), equivalent to the top 1-3 percent of test takers. Not only is this good enough to get into the top 20 American universities, as long as one’s other factors are passable, there is even a chance of getting into an Ivy League school (25 percent of students enrolled at Princeton didn’t score above 2100).

Thus public reaction to this case of cheating has been quite intense. Even though those involved were just high school students and recent college graduates and a big name lawyer said that this shouldn’t even count as a misdemeanor, the New York state authorities persist in prosecuting this case as a felony. As for the College Board, which manages the SAT test, they have declared that they will spare no expense and have hired ex-FBI chief Louis Freeh to lead the task of strengthening the SAT’s security measures. That competition to enter universities has entered such unscrupulous territory that it not only reflects the red-hot intensity of American society’s competition, it also illustrates money’s corrupting influence on the opportunities of elite education.
The writer works in North America doing scientific research.


尽管有草根阶层的反精英主义,共和党总统初选中日渐领先的罗姆尼和金里奇,却都是不折不扣的知识精英,尤其罗姆尼被认为最可能胜出。如此一来,无论谁明年赢得大选,白宫将会继续由哈佛大学校友坐庄。

  另一方面,“占领华尔街”运动以来,两极分化成为美国的热门议题。财富分配不论,《国家评论》等保守派舆论,也开始承认社会机会的不平等现象。《纽约时报》和《华盛顿邮报》新近都强调了美国下层民众的社会上升机会(upward mobility),已经落在德国、法国、加拿大等国之后。这一现象的根本原因在于美国教育机会的分化:穷人子女继续贫穷,主因是教育程度低下。

  知识精英持续把持美国“上层建筑”,揭示美国中上阶级维持下一代社会地位的关键,不在于财富继承,而在于子女获得良好教育,尤其是精英教育机会。年前《虎妈战歌》引起空前争议,特别是虎妈长女后来获得哈佛等名校录取,正是打中了中上阶级的这一社会竞争焦虑。

  中国和其他亚洲国家的考试文化,尤其是“一考定终身”的高考,遭到不少社会批评。殊不知美国也存在深刻的“高考”文化,并因之催生了年产值超过数十亿美元的“高复”工业。我新近由北京中华书局出版了关于美国名校“入学攻略”的小书《圆梦哈佛》,对此有所介绍。然而在年底截止的每年一度美国大学入学申请热潮中,数月前曝光的纽约长岛“高考”作弊案新近愈演愈烈,把美国“高考”文化狂热推到了前所未有的高度。

丑闻并非孤立案件

  这一案件的要旨,是许多高中生在美国标准化SAT和ACT大学入学考试中雇用“枪手”代考,以获得高分。案子初发时,人们以为这是长岛一所高中内部的罕发孤立事件,结果数月下来,揭发出越来越多的事例,数十名涉案者波及多家学校和学区,而且可能只是冰山的顶尖。

  像《虎妈》争议一样,这一高考作弊案引起美国精英媒体的密切关注,从《纽约时报》、《华尔街日报》到各大电视网都有追踪报道。这是因为此类舞弊不仅打破了“费厄泼赖”(fairplay),更直接关系到中上阶级下一代的未来社会机会。

  纽约州参议院高教委员会主席拉维理(Kenneth LaValle)如此道破作弊案的严重性:“(SAT考试)决定考生未来的人生路程。”
在若干层次上,美国高考文化的社会影响更甚于中国。例如每个学区的SAT平均成绩直接影响当地的房地产价格涨落。上述“人生路程”论断更加醒目,这是因为再是强调“综合素质”,SAT和ACT分数仍然是美国大学,包括常春藤名校入学申请的重要条件。大量调查数据表明:一个学生未来的社会成功机会,与所上大学的名声或排名次序高度相关。华尔街充斥常春藤校友之外,《大西洋月刊》年前从金钱角度图示了这一强烈关系:头几名名牌大学毕业生几年后的平均年薪,超过排名第50的大学毕业生三分之二!

  报载枪手代考SAT的价格是2500到3500美元,绝不是下层家庭付得起的金额,前引州议员更指出这也不是中学生口袋中的零花钱,所以涉案者父母必然知情。案发的长岛地区富人和知识精英众多,又是亚裔和犹太人群集之地,名牌大学的入学竞争特别惨烈。已知的涉案学校,不仅有公立“重点”中学,也有私立贵族学校。披露的作弊者有伊朗裔美国人,也有犹太人,不过至今尚无华裔名字。

  已经披露的某枪手代考SAT分数是2140到2220分(满分2400),相当于顶尖1-3%考生成绩。这不仅足以进入美国排名前二十的大学,只要其他条件过得去,甚至也有进入常春藤名校的机会(普林斯顿大学有25%录取生SAT分数不超过2100)。

  对作弊案的社会反应因此相当强烈。当事人虽然是才十几岁的高中生和近期毕业生,还有大牌律师辩护说这连轻罪案(misdemeanor)都算不上,纽约州当局还是坚持将此作为重罪(felony)刑事案起诉。至于主持SAT考试的高校理事会(College Board),则宣布不惜重金,聘请联邦调查局离任局长弗里(Louis Freeh)出山,来强化SAT考试的保安工作。大学入学竞争到了如此不择手段的地步,不仅反映了美国社会竞争的白热化,也显示金钱对精英教育机会的腐蚀。

作者在北美从事科研工作
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Topics

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge