America’s Carpool Culture

Published in Xinhua
(China) on 22 January 2012
by Ma Xiaoning (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Howard Segal. Edited by Alyssa Goulding .
When I first arrived in the United States as a reporter, the media once invited me to write an article on Americans carpooling. At that time, my first reaction was that, since America was this nation of vehicles on wheels, with most families having an average of one vehicle, why would people want to carpool? After spending some time there I discovered that the history of American carpool culture isn’t that short after all and that a majority of states and regional governments encourage people to carpool.

Among America's traffic icons, there is one marked like a diamond. On the signs at the entrances of some highways you can see this symbol along with the word “HOV.” This is the acronym for High Occupancy Vehicle, which means a vehicle that seats many people. The signs also say “Monday – Friday,” the time period, as well as “two or three or more people” — indicating that within the HOV time period (work days), only those vehicles with a precise number of passengers are permitted to enter this express lane commonly called the carpool lane.

HOV time is during rush hour, but it is different in opposite directions for the same stretch of road. The direction entering the city has HOV in the morning, while the direction leaving the city has HOV from 4:30 to 6:30 p.m. Violators receive a much heavier ticket than the average traffic violation; there are some counties where the fine can reach upward of $1000.

America’s carpool culture at its earliest began in the 1940s, around the time of World War II, when the shortage of oil and rubber limited the use of individual vehicles. In the 1970s, the oil crisis made the price of American gasoline rise sharply, and in order to save the cost of using cars, many large companies provided employees collective carpool services. Statistics show that at that time, approximately a quarter of Americans wanted to carpool to and from work. In several states, the number of carpooling families reached more than half that of all drivers.

This phenomenon has inspired municipal traffic managers to believe carpooling is a clever move to raise highway usage and reduce traffic congestion, and HOV lanes have arisen in response to demand. In order for most carpoolers to live in a suburban home with an automobile, they often plan to meet each other at a certain location and carpool from there. To encourage carpooling, many places are building parking lots for carpools with favorable prices.

The 1970s and '80s became the golden age of American carpool culture. Moreover, what was unexpected for municipal traffic managers was that the profound changes occurring in American society and the economy made this era very short-lived. Due to people living and working in more and more dispersed locations, women entering the workplace, an increase in household income, a change in the average household vehicle situation and other common reasons, the power of carpooling disappeared and carpool culture has gone downhill. According to official data, America’s population has increased by one third since the 1980s, private car ownership has increased 60 percent and the number of carpoolers has decreased by half. At its peak, a special scene could be observed from time to time: On four-lane highways, traffic would crawl slowly in the three ordinary traffic lanes while there would be smooth sailing in the HOV lane.

Because of traffic jams, some people drive their cars up to two hours each way to get to and from work. To save time, there are still some people who choose to carpool and use the HOV lane. Strangers can find carpooling partners through social networking and carpooling websites; some people at community-established carpool locations publicize their own destinations to find fellow travelers going the same way. This type of carpooling between strangers has established a kind of foundation of mutual trust in American society.

Although the trend is that the number of carpoolers has declined, which frustrates municipal traffic management personnel, they believe that carpooling still has a future. With the popularity of today’s social networks people have an even easier time finding carpooling partners. The increase in environmental awareness also contributes to this cultural resurgence. Many people believe that American carpool culture will again see a golden age, but the government may have to design more effective stimulus measures.


美国的拼车文化 

初到美国做记者时,曾有国内媒体约写美国人拼车的文章。当时第一反应是,美国这个“汽车轮子上的国度”,多数家庭人均一辆车,人们哪里需要拼车?待了一段时间就发现,美国人的拼车文化历史不短,大多数州及地方政府都鼓励民众拼车。

  美国的交通图标中有一个菱形标。在一些高速路入口处的标志牌上,可见这一标志及“HOV”字样,HOV为英文High Occupancy Vehicle的首字母缩写,为“多人乘坐车辆”之意。标志牌上同时有周一至周五、时间段以及2人或3人以上的信息,表明在5个工作日的HOV时间内,只有车内人数达到一定数量的车辆才被允许进入这一俗称“拼车道”的快行道。

  HOV时间都是上下班高峰期,同一条路的不同方向,HOV时间不同。进城方向为早晨,出城方向则在下午4点半到6点半间。违者要收到比一般交通违规重得多的罚单,有的州县罚金可达上千美元。

  美国的拼车文化最早始于上世纪40年代,二战前后,原油及橡胶的短缺限制了个人车辆的使用。上世纪70年代,石油危机让美国汽油价格大幅上涨,为节约用车成本,许多大公司给雇员提供集体拼车服务。统计数字显示,当时几乎1/4的美国人上下班都要拼车。在有些州,拼车族能占到全部驾车人的一半之多。

  这一现象让市政交通管理者受到启发,认为拼车是提高道路使用率、减缓交通拥堵的妙招,拼车道应运而生。绝大多数拼车人为住在远郊的有车族,他们往往相约在某一地点碰面,然后拼车。为了鼓励拼车,许多地方还建有拼车停车场,价格优惠。

  上世纪七八十年代成为美国拼车文化的黄金年代。然而,让市政交通管理者始料不及的是,美国社会和经济发生的深刻变化让这一黄金时代犹如昙花一现。由于人们居住、工作变得越来越分散,众多女性走入职场,家庭收入增加,家庭人均一辆车情况司空见惯等原因,拼车动力消失,拼车文化走了下坡路。根据美国官方的数据,自上世纪80年代以来,美国人口增加了1/3,私人汽车拥有量增加了60%,拼车人则减少了一半。高峰时期,不时可见一道特别的“风景”:4车道的高速公路上,其中3条普通道车流爬行,拼车道则畅通无阻。

  因为交通堵塞,一些人上下班单程要开车两个小时。为了节省时间,有些人还是选择拼车利用快车道。互不相识的人们通过社交网络、拼车网等,结成拼车伙伴;有些人则在社区设立的拼车点报出自己的目的地,寻找同路人。这种陌生人之间的拼车,建立在美国社会的一种相互信任的基础上。

  拼车人数量下降的趋势虽然让市政交通管理人员感到沮丧,但他们相信拼车仍有未来。在社交网络流行的今天,人们更容易找到拼车伙伴。环保意识的提高也有助于这一文化重新流行。许多人认为,美国拼车文化要重现黄金时代,政府可能要设计更多有效的刺激措施。(马小宁)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might