Strengthening of US and China Military Interaction Is Right on Time

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 10 May 2012
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Peter Nix. Edited by Katya Abazajian.
Liang Guanglie, China’s defense secretary and a member of the state council, currently visiting Washington D.C., expressed that he hopes to build “a new kind of military relationship” with the U.S. during a meeting with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. This type of military relationship he has in mind would be “equal, cooperative and mutually beneficial.” Guanglie’s statement asking for the establishment of an equal relationship reflects China’s increasingly strong national defense capabilities, as well as the military confidence that has arisen from the change. Examined from another angle, this has positive significance for the establishment of more substantial Chinese-U.S. military relations.

The U.S.’s strategy has already tacitly acknowledged China’s sudden rise. Obviously, this doesn’t mean that the two superpowers will stop playing diplomatic games with each other. Although China and the U.S. are more economically interdependent with each passing day and political contacts are also becoming more and more frequent, military cooperation has always been a weak link in the two countries’ relations. This, admittedly, has to do with the inherent sensitivity of military domain, for example the two countries’ military relations are often influenced by U.S. arms sales to Taiwan. It also can’t be ruled out that China’s military stance is relatively conservative because its national power as a whole still lags relatively far behind the U.S.’s.

One of the main obstacles for Chinese-U.S. military cooperation is America’s arms sales to Taiwan. The last time – in 2010 -- that the U.S. sold arms to Taiwan, Beijing broke off Chinese-U.S. military interactions in retaliation. Any other time that there is a contradiction or nervousness in Chinese-U.S. relations, China will often reduce their military interaction as a way to demonstrate their dissatisfaction. On the other hand, America has taken the initiative in regard to Chinese-U.S. military interactions. This may be because China is stingy in revealing defense information and the U.S. hopes that using military interaction will allow them to better understand China’s military development and, especially, its strategic intentions. For Washington, being familiar with its continually strengthening opponent is in accordance with the “know yourself, know your enemy” principle of military strategy.

Military strength doesn’t exist in isolation. Behind America’s global dominance lies an open society, free public expression, robust technological innovation, a risk-taking corporate mentality, active corporations, etc …. Benefitting from an extended period of double digit growth in military expenditures, China’s military power has naturally seen a corresponding increase. Guanglie’s request that America respect China’s military position and treat China as an equal could possibly have been a signal that Beijing is changing its conservative stance. The confidence that China displays in its military affairs is beneficial for the establishment of a more stable defense relationship between the U.S. and China.

Guanglie’s most recent visit to the U.S. took place just as China and the Philippines began a confrontation in the waters surrounding Huangyan Island in the South China Sea. Although both the Philippine minister of foreign affairs and its defense minister had previously visited the U.S. together in order to launch a security dialogue, China’s diplomatic position towards the Philippines is becoming more and more forceful. On May 7, the Chinese Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister Fu Ying warned that China is already prepared to deal with any escalations in the situation. A government spokesperson further stated, “China doesn’t have a refined ‘turn the other cheek’ attitude .… If one’s had all one can stand, there’s no need to stand for more.” America had previously announced a “return to Asia” strategy, causing people in all circles to fear an increased risk of Chinese-U.S. conflict. Because of this, a timely increase in U.S.-China military interaction might put people at ease.

The recent group visit to the U.S. by several high ranking Chinese officers included not only the leaders of China’s navy, army, air force and the leader of the strategic nuclear warhead second artillery, but also the commanders of both the Shenyang military district in the northeast and the Xinjiang military district in the northwest. This means that in addition to discussing global issues, the two sides likely also had thorough exchanges over such concrete issues as the North Korean nuclear problem, central Asian security and the war in Afghanistan. The U.S. has arranged for Guanglie’s delegation to visit a few army, navy and air force bases that have been opened up to China for the first time, as well as the West Point Military Academy and Southern Command, emphasizing the importance given to this delegation by their host.

History has made it clear that many military conflicts were, in fact, the result of insufficient information, leading policy makers to misjudge their opponent’s intentions. If they had had a command of the situation’s facts beforehand, they would be able to prevent the guns from going off unexpectedly. In this way, the U.S. and the Soviet Union, the two superpowers involved in the nuclear arms confrontations of the Cold War era, established a hotline for their leaders to directly engage in dialogue, despite using agents to fight proxy wars across the globe, in the event that a situation might suddenly get out of control as the result of a misunderstanding. Increasing military interaction and enhancing understanding between the U.S. and China serves the same purpose.

The Asia-Pacific region is an important engine for development in the current global economy, so we need to guarantee that the region continues enjoying a peaceful and stable environment. U.S.-Chinese cooperation plays a crucial role in advancing peaceful development in the Asia-Pacific region. In the same way, military interaction can promote mutual trust and reduce disagreements. Panetta has already accepted an invitation to visit China during the second half of this year and the U.S. and Chinese militaries are planning to take joint anti-piracy actions. A more equal military relationship is in the interest of both countries and the region in general.


美中加强军事交流正适时

正在华盛顿访问的中国国务委员兼国防部长梁光烈,在会晤美国国防部长帕内塔时表示,希望与美国发展“新型军事关系”,这种军事关系应该是“平等的、合作的、共赢的”。梁光烈要求建立平等关系的说法,反映了中国日益壮大的国防能力,以及由此产生的军事自信。从另一个角度审视,这对美中建立更具实质性的军事关系,未尝没有积极的意义。

美国在战略上已经默认了中国崛起的事实。当然,这并不代表两个大国将终止彼此的外交博弈。虽然美中在经济上的相互依赖日益紧密,在政治上的交往也趋于频繁,但军事合作始终是两国关系上的一块短板。这固然与军事领域本身的敏感性有关,例如两国军事关系经常受到美国对台军售的影响;但也不能排除中国因为整体国力与美国有较大的差距,而在军事交流上采取比较保守的态度。

美中军事交流与合作的主要障碍之一是美国的对台军售。上一次美国于2010年对台军售,北京就以中断美中军事交流作为报复。每当美中关系在其他时候出现紧张或矛盾时,降低军事交流层级来表达不满也是中国常用的手段。相反的,美国在美中军事交流上采取了主动的态度。这或许是因为中国吝于透露国防信息,美国希望通过交流来了解中国的军事发展,尤其是其战略意图。对华盛顿而言,熟悉持续壮大的对手,符合兵家知己知彼的教诲。

  武装实力并非孤立存在,美国军事独霸全球的背后,有开放的社会、自由的舆论、雄厚的科技创新、冒险的企业精神、活力十足的企业等作为支撑。同理,中国经济实力的持续增长,也为其国防力量提供了有力的支持。得益于长期双位数的军费增长,中国的军力自然相应有所增强。梁光烈要求美国在军事上尊重中国的地位,平等相待,有可能是北京改变保守姿态的信号。中国在军事上展现的自信,有利于美中建立更为稳定的国防关系。

梁光烈本次访美,正值中国与菲律宾在南中国海黄岩岛海域对峙,虽然菲律宾外交部长和国防部长此前联袂访问美国展开安全对话,中国对菲外交姿态却有越来越高之势。中国外交部副部长傅莹5月7日警告,中国已经做好各种应付事态扩大的准备;官方喉舌更表明,中国“没有打不还手的雅兴”、“忍无可忍就无须再忍”。美国先前高调宣布“重返亚太”的战略,也让各界担心中美短兵相接的风险增高。因此,美中适时加强军事交流,让人感到鼓舞。

本次随团访美的中国将领,除了海陆空军和战略核弹第二炮兵的主管,也包括了东北沈阳军区及西北新疆军区的司令官。这意味着在全局性课题进行对话之外,双方也很可能就朝核问题、中亚安全形势及阿富汗战争等具体议题深入交流。美国安排梁光烈一行参观一些首次对中国开放的海陆空三军及陆战队基地,并访问西点军校及南方司令部指挥中心,显示东道主对此行的重视。

历史经验表明,许多军事冲突其实都是因为信息不足,导致决策者误判对手意图而发生。如果事前对情况有充足的掌握,就能够防止擦枪走火的意外。所以,美苏两大超级强国在核子武器对垒的冷战年代,虽然通过代理人在全球打局部战争,双方却设立了领导人能直接对话的热线,在突发事件时避免因误解而让情势失控。美中加强军事交流,增进了解,意义相同。

  亚太是当今推动全球经济发展的重要引擎,需要确保本区域继续享有和平稳定的环境。美中两国的合作,对于促进亚太的和平发展有着关键性的作用。两国在军事上的交流,同样能起到增进互信,减少分歧的效果。帕内塔已经接受邀请,将在下半年回访中国,美中两军也计划举行联合反海盗演习。一个更对等的军事交流关系,符合双方及本区域的利益。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Topics

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge