Developing the US-China Relationship Requires Vision and Wisdom

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 9 May 2012
by Wang Yuanfeng (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lisa Ferguson. Edited by Lydia Dallett.
Taking Stock of the Situation

What is the future of the relationship between China and the U.S. — the two most important nations in the world? What should the future of the relationship be? Many people around the world are considering this question, and many also have doubts about it. This year is a presidential election year in the U.S. and Chinese issues are increasingly becoming hot topics. The U.S.-China relationship could be put to the test. More importantly, with all of the changes brought about by China's rapid development, both the U.S. and China need to engage in dialogue, utilize U.S.-China strategic and economic mechanisms, enhance mutual understanding and trust and expand bilateral cooperation.

It is even more necessary, however, that they gain a deeper understanding of the future global structure in the 21st century and the general trend of developing bilateral relations. Only in this way can China and the U.S. explore building mutual respect and cooperate on the path to a new win-win relationship between world powers.

During the 1980s, when the U.S. put sanctions on China, Deng Xiaoping said that it is only right for relations between China and the U.S. to improve. This is a correct judgment on U.S.-China relations made by a great figure over 20 years ago. Even after over 20 years, following the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and following China's rise and the financial crisis that shook Western countries, profound changes are occurring in the global structure. After just 10 or 20 years, China's economic output will surpass that of the United States, thus becoming the number one economic power in the world. Yet the need to keep improving U.S.-China relations is an extremely important strategic decision. This determination is an important precondition for encouraging development of bilateral relations. If China and the U.S. can both preserve this common understanding, then U.S.-China relations can withstand any test.

Ensuring that the U.S.-China relationship continues to improve is in line with the individual development needs of both countries as well as the demands of global development. Recently, the Project Syndicate published two articles which gave a very good interpretation. One was by Nobel laureate in economics Michael Spence, entitled "Reinventing the Sino-American Relationship." Spence emphasized that over the last three decades or so, the two countries have benefited from their contact with one another. Many different technologies were transferred from the U.S. to China, making China's labor-intensive exports more competitive and promoting its economic growth. At the same time, American consumers enjoyed the benefit of lower priced goods. In the future, even if both countries face the challenge of a changing structure, the core of bilateral relations is clear: "China needs U.S. innovation to grow, and the U.S. needs Chinese markets to grow." This article has been widely republished in both countries' media, which shows that even if Spence was merely stating a basic idea, it received widespread attention and approval.

Collaborating to Solve Mankind's Problems

The other article, "A World Adrift," was by Professor Jeffrey Sachs of America's Columbia University, a special advisor to United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon. He indicated that geopolitics is moving from unipolar to multipolar. Global economics are becoming less stable and less sustainable. Under these circumstances, global governance is weakening, provided public goods are insufficient and the global economy is facing an upsurge in the price of goods. Additionally, issues are emerging with resources and the environment, which demands the joint cooperation of all nations, or else the world will have even greater problems. Sachs tells of yet another dimension of U.S.-China relations that must be considered: Following the development of globalization, more and more countries are moving on a path toward modernization — and mankind is facing more and more problems. Countries are increasingly facing shared challenges. With China and the U.S. being the world's two most influential powers, they should develop more of an attitude of responsibility to mankind and to the world, and more sincerely engage in cooperation to address global issues. Thus, it is only right that relations between China and the U.S. continue to improve.

To achieve improvement in U.S.-China relations, both the U.S. and China need to work together. As for the U.S., first, it must treat China's rise correctly. The U.S. has already sufficiently recognized that there is no way to stop China's rise. Yet the attitude that although there is no way to constrain China's rise, the process of China's rise should be slowed is not right either. This attitude leads the U.S. to take all kinds of "small actions" against China. In the short term, these "small actions" seem to benefit the U.S., but they are not good for establishing strategic trust between the two nations. In the long term, however, they are detrimental to the establishment of genuinely good bilateral relations.

Recently, a Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs official published an article in Huanqiu Times aimed at the United States' addition of military bases on China's periphery, as well as its high-profile pronouncements that it is "returning to the Asia-Pacific." Copying Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's “Seven Questions for China,” he made a list of “Strategic Doubts on America's China Policy.” The two countries have a relationship kind of like a husband and wife; if one side always acts in a way that is harmful to the marriage, how can both parties solidify their relationship and pull together in times of trouble? Not to mention, the U.S. needs to move beyond its ideological shackles. When it comes to China's social system, the U.S. need not take these troubles to heart, but instead stand back and look at these issues from a strategic point of view. China's system of step-by-step reform is beneficial to global stability and to American development. Moreover, from the perspective confronting humankind's increasingly serious common challenges in the 21st century, when fascism was defeated at the time of World War II, the UK and the U.S. were able to cooperate with the Soviet Union, despite its completely different social system. Could it be that it is now even harder for China and the U.S. to engage in sincere cooperation?

As for China, first it must constantly adjust and acclimate to the demands of its changing role brought about by its own development. China has already become one of the most important global societies. Even though its own domestic problems are numerous, amid the changing global winds, it is already true that China cannot merely develop itself single-mindedly. China needs to give more consideration to global development and international issues; it needs to take a more active role. Some think that China needs to adjust its foreign policy of “concealing one's strengths and biding one's time”; it should be said that this is reasonable. Next, as China and the U.S. develop their relationship, the need to break free from the shadow of “conspiracy theories.” They should recognize the present mutual suspicion in U.S.-China relations. Many of America's previously mentioned “small actions,” especially its testing of China's bottom line, makes China very uneasy. However, China does not need to be so sensitive, as its interpretation of America's actions has been excessively negative. Where did U.S.-China relations go wrong? The U.S. cannot speak ill of China, but China must also have confidence as it builds its relationship with the U.S.; staying calm is very important.

On the other hand, China wants to exclude irrational voices that interfere in the U.S.-China relationship. Now that China has entered into the era of universal diplomacy, people from all realms of society will voice their opinions. This will require the Chinese government to listen carefully to all ideas, and to ensure that the overall U.S.-China relationship remains friendly and does not waver. As for the idea that China is always prone to the flexing of muscles and such saber-rattling, it must develop more social resources in order to dissolve conflict and shape favorable domestic public opinion.

Regardless of whether the 21st century is led by the United States, China and the U.S. together or even by China alone, it is necessary for these two most important powers to improve relations. Only in this way can the world move forward and develop peacefully. Should U.S.-China relations break down, or should the countries collide, that would be mankind's misfortune.

The author is a professor at Beijing Jiaotong University.


王元丰:发展中美关系需要远见卓识

(2012-05-09)

● 王元丰

中美这两个世界上最重要的国家未来关系会怎样?中美两国的关系未来应该怎样?这是世界上很多人思考、也是很多人疑惑的问题。今年是美国总统大选年,在美国关于涉华问题的辩论不断升温,中美关系可能又面临考验。更为重要的是,面对中国快速发展所带来的诸多变化,无论是美国还是中国,双方不仅需要通过诸如中美战略与经济对话等机制,增进相互了解和信任,扩大双边多边合作,更需要对21世纪未来世界的格局,以及双方未来关系的发展大势有更深刻的认识,才能更好地“探索中美共同建设相互尊重、合作共赢的新型大国关系之道”。

  其实,在上世纪80年代末美国制裁中国时,邓小平就说过:中美两国关系总要好起来才行。这是一个伟人在二十多年前对中美关系作出的正确判断。尽管二十多年后,随着苏东的解体、随着中国的崛起以及西方国家爆发经济危机,世界格局发生了深刻变化,在不久的10年或者不太久的20年后,中国的经济总量将超过美国成为世界第一大经济体,但是中美两国关系必须好起来,这是一个非常重要的战略判断。这样的判断是引导两国关系发展的重要前提,如果中美两国都能够持有这样的共识,那么中美关系就能经受各种考验。

  中美两国关系必须好起来,这符合中美两国自身发展的需要,符合世界发展的要求。近来,在《世界报业辛迪加》上刊载的两篇文章,对此做了很好的诠释。一篇是诺贝尔经济学奖得主迈克尔·斯宾塞所写的“重塑中美关系”,斯宾塞强调:在过去30多年,两国在与对方的交往中相互受益。来自美国和其他西方国家的技术转让,使中国劳动密集型出口更具竞争力并推动中国经济增长;与此同时,价格更低的商品对美国消费者大有裨益。未来,尽管面临结构性转变的挑战,但双边关系的核心依然明确:“中国的增长需要美国的创新,美国的增长需要中国的市场”。这篇文章被中国和美国两国媒体广泛转载,说明尽管斯宾塞只是讲了一个浅显的道理,但得到广泛关注和认同。

共同解决人类面对的问题

  另一篇由联合国秘书长潘基文特别顾问、美国哥伦比亚大学教授杰佛瑞·萨克斯所写的名为“漂泊的世界”的文章,则指出世界政治正从单极走向多极、世界经济变得更为不稳定和不可持续。在这种形势下全球治理不力、公共物品提供不足以及世界经济面临的商品价格高涨、资源和环境突出问题,要求世界各国必须共同合作,否则世界将出现问题。萨克斯道出了中美关系发展的另一个要参照的维度:随着全球化的发展,越来越多国家走向现代化道路,人类面临越来越多的问题,各国越来越多面临更多共同的挑战,中美作为世界两个最有影响力的大国,应该更多地本着对人类、对世界负责的态度,更多地真诚合作处理全球事务。所以,中美两国关系必须好起来才行。

  中美两国关系好起来,需要美国和中国两个国家共同努力。从美国方面,首先要正确对待中国的崛起。对于中国的崛起无法阻挡,美国方面已有充分的认识。但是,持有虽然无法遏制中国崛起,但要延缓中国崛起的进程,也不是正确的态度。在这种态度指导下,就会有针对中国的种种“小动作”。这些“小动作”在短期看,似乎有利于美国,但却不利于两国真正建立战略互信,从长远看不利于两国真正建立良好的关系。

  最近,一名中国外交部官员在中国的《环球时报》撰文,针对美国在中国周边增设军事基地、高调宣布“重返亚太”等行动,仿照希拉莉国务卿的“七问中国”,给美国采取的这些行动“开单子”,“七问美国对华战略疑点”。两国关系同夫妻关系很类似,一方总有不利于婚姻的行为,双方的感情怎么会变得牢靠,遇到问题时这个家庭的两个家长怎么能够同心协力呢?此外,美国要超越意识形态的束缚。对于中国的社会制度,美国不必总是耿耿于怀,要从更大的战略、更高的高度看待这一问题。中国循序渐进的制度改革有利于世界的稳定、有利于美国的发展,而且,从共同面对21世纪人类的日益严峻挑战看,二战时为了打败法西斯,英国和美国能够与社会制度完全不同的苏联合作,现在中美精诚合作的困难难道更大吗?

  在中国方面,首先要不断调整、适应自身发展所带来的角色变换要求。中国已经是国际社会中最重要的成员之一。尽管中国自身内部问题多多,但是,在风云变幻的世界上,中国已经无法只一心一意谋自身发展。中国需要对世界发展、需要对国际问题有更多的思考,需要发挥更积极的作用。有人认为中国的“韬光养晦”外交政策需要做出调整,应该说有合理性。其次,中国与美国交往中要摆脱“阴谋论”的阴影。应该承认当前中美两国互疑较深,美方很多前面提到的“小动作”,尤其是一些试探中国底线的做法,让中国很不放心。但是中国也不用过于敏感,对美国的行为过多地做负面的解读。“中美关系也坏不到哪儿去”,美国也不能将中国怎么样,与美国交往自信、从容很重要。

  另外,中国要排除不理性声音对中美关系的干扰。现在中国进入了全民外交时代,对于中美关系中的问题,社会各界都会表达意见。这就要求中国政府既要全面倾听各方意见,又要坚持中美友好大局绝不动摇。对于那种中国总是倾向于亮肌肉等吵吵闹闹的意见,要发挥多种社会资源化解,形成良好国内舆论氛围。

  21世纪,世界无论是美国主导,还是中美两国共同主导,甚至是中国主导,都需要这世界上两个最重要的国家关系好起来,只有如此,世界才能平稳地向前发展。而中美两国关系破裂、发生冲撞,那则是人类的不幸。

作者是北京交通大学教授

中美两国关系必须好起来,这符合中美两国自身发展的需要,符合世界发展的要求。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Migration: A Political Crisis?

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Germany: Donald Trump Is Damaging the US

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Topics

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge