US Sending More Troops to Africa to Offset China's Influence

Published in QQ
(China) on 11 April 2013
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Elizabeth Cao. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Carter Ham, the outgoing commander of the U.S. Africa Command, recently said that if they are not suppressed, the expanding African Islamic extremist forces will pose a huge threat to the United States. It’s not hard to understand from this that Ham is trying to appeal for more troops to be sent to Africa.

Despite establishing AFRICOM in 2007, the United States military still insisted that it had no real plans to establish a base or send troops there. But now, the military holds at least 10 military bases in Africa and has about 5,000 military personnel deployed in the region. The United States Air Force also intends to establish four bases there; the Navy is increasing its involvement on the eastern and western coasts of Africa. With this amount of involvement in the region, who does the military think it is trying to fool?

The fight against terrorism is a direct and practical consideration of the United States in Africa. After the events of the Arab Spring, regimes in Egypt, Libya and other countries collapsed, leaving North Africa with minimal leadership. Extremist Islamic forces with terrorist tendencies began to rapidly spread in the region. In 2012, the Congregation of the People of Tradition for Proselytism and Jihad, better known as Boko Haram, carried out dozens of terrorist attacks in Central and West Africa. At the beginning of 2013, extremist groups in Mali created a lot of ruckus and Algeria had a hostage crisis, making North Africa the center of global terrorism. Especially after the attack on the U.S. ambassador to Libya in Benghazi in September of last year, the United States issued an initiative to put more troops in Africa. In December of 2012, the Associated Press disclosed that a U.S. Army brigade would begin sending teams into 35 African nations in early 2013. By 2014, the United States Army will have prepared an additional two brigades to be sent to Africa. In February of this year, the soon-to-be-appointed commander of AFRICOM, David Rodriguez, wrote in a statement addressed to the Senate Armed Services Committee to increase the military intelligence-gathering and reconnaissance mission efforts in Africa by 15 times.

Implementation of Western values is yet another motivation for the U.S. military to increase involvement in Africa. In the international area, the United States has always pushed the so-called liberal democratic values as a part of their foreign policy, whether it was Clinton’s expansion strategy or Bush’s “Greater Middle East Initiative.” The Obama administration cannot afford to allow other values enter the Middle East or North Africa. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton visited Africa in 2009 and emphasized the importance of good governance in African countries. Some analysts believe that this was not completely unrelated to the outbreak of the Arab Spring and that the United States helped fuel and incite the revolution. One book about the background of the Arab Spring revealed how social media was utilized to promote the Arab revolution. Despite the regime changes in Egypt and Libya and the situation in Syria being stalled, the United States still continued to send troops to Africa to undoubtedly protect and promote its democratic values.

Offsetting China’s influence in Africa is also an important consideration for the United States. In recent years, with the continuous development of China’s relations with Africa, China’s influence in Africa is expanding rapidly. Politically, China’s partnership with many countries in Africa is very welcoming and trusting. Economic trade between China and Africa in 2012 totaled nearly $200 billion, almost twice the trade between the United States and Africa. In terms of culture, the Confucius Institute and other Chinese institutions began to take root in Africa. Possibly jealous of China’s rapidly expanding influence in Africa, many departments in the U.S. government have agreed to try to curb the interests and influences of China in Africa. Due to the open door policy, the usual practice of the United States is to use its military means to defend their economic interests. As one German radio station said, the United States wants to use “hard power” to offset China’s “soft power.”

Senator John McCain, in evaluation of Obama’s authorization to send troops to Uganda, said, “I worry about with the best of intentions we somehow get engaged in a commitment that we can’t get out of.” Recalling the situation regarding the United States in Somalia, McCain’s concerns are not unreasonable.


即将卸任的美国非洲司令部司令卡特·哈姆近日表示:“如果不加以打压,不断膨胀的非洲伊斯兰极端势力将对美在非利益构成巨大威胁。”不难听出,哈姆发出这番警告,意在呼吁美军向非洲增兵。
2007年设立非洲司令部时,美军还口口声声说并无在非洲建立基地或派遣部队的计划。但如今,美军在非洲已至少拥有10处军事基地,约5000名军事人员部署在非洲各国,美国空军正在非洲建立第4个无人机基地,海军也正增加在东、西非沿岸的任务……美军加紧在非洲投棋布子,葫芦里卖的什么药?
反恐是美军进入非洲的直接和现实考量。“阿拉伯之春”爆发后,埃及、利比亚等政权相继垮台,北非地区出现权力真空,伊斯兰主义空前高涨,极端宗教和恐怖势力相互勾结并呈迅速蔓延之势。2012年,“伊斯兰马格里布基地组织”“博科圣地”等新型恐怖组织在中非和西非地区制造了数十起恐怖袭击事件。2013年伊始,极端组织在马里大肆折腾、阿尔及利亚爆发人质危机,北非地区正成为全球恐怖主义活动的中心。特别是去年9月美国驻利比亚班加西领馆遇袭后,美国出台了一系列增兵非洲的举措:2012年12月,美联社披露美军将在2013年初向非洲35国派驻一个陆军旅。美国陆军部拟定于2014年向非洲增派两个旅。今年2月,即将出任美军非洲司令部司令的戴维·罗德里格斯在写给参议院军事委员会的书面声明中呼吁,把美军在非洲的情报收集和侦察任务增加15倍。
推行西方价值观是美军进入非洲的又一动因。在国际上推行所谓的自由民主价值观一直是美国外交的一大目的,无论是克林顿的“参与扩展战略”、小布什的“大中东计划”,还是奥巴马政府对中东北非地区的直接或间接干涉,都脱不掉推行价值观的影子。奥巴马和希拉里2009年先后访非,均强调了非洲国家“良政”的重要性。有分析认为,“阿拉伯之春”的爆发与美国的蓄意煽动和推波助澜不无关系,《阿拉伯革命背后隐藏的一面》一书便揭示了美国如何利用多年培训的骨干、社交媒体等促成“阿拉伯革命”。政权更迭后的埃及和利比亚动荡不止,叙利亚局势陷入僵局,美国不断增兵非洲无疑有以武力作后盾,保障其民主价值观继续推进的考虑在内。
抵消中国在非洲的影响力是美军进入非洲的重要考虑。近年来,随着中非双方关系的不断发展,中国在非洲的影响力迅速扩大。政治上,中国一直是非洲国家非常欢迎和信赖的伙伴;经济上,2012年中非贸易额接近2000亿美元,几乎是美非贸易额的两倍;文化上,中国的孔子学院等机构开始在非洲扎根……中国在非洲迅速扩大的影响力令美国眼红。当前,遏制中国在非洲的利益和影响力已成为美国各政府部门的共识。而自“门户开放”政策以来,使用军事手段捍卫经济利益是美国的一贯做法。正如德国电台指出,美国向非洲增兵是想用“硬实力”来抵消中国的“软实力”。
美国参议员约翰·麦凯恩在评价奥巴马授权出兵乌干达时曾指出:“即便抱有最好的意图,我也担心,我们会陷入一种不能自拔的境地。”回想当年美军在索马里的遭遇,麦凯恩所言不无道理。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: US against Venezuela: No Lawless Zone

Honduras: The Strange Hope of an Unstable Country

Israel: Trump’s Truancy

Turkey: Will Trump’s 28 Points Be Enough for Ukrainian Sovereignty?

South Korea: A Free Pass for Violence: The ‘Triple Collusion’ of Ronaldo, Trump and FIFA

Topics

Turkey: Will Trump’s 28 Points Be Enough for Ukrainian Sovereignty?

Pakistan: Hardening the Frontier

Singapore: Trump’s Unconventional Diplomacy Will Come at High Cost for US Partners

Pakistan: Setting the World on Fire

Pakistan: A Lone Gunman Sparks Trump’s War on Legal Immigrants

Israel: Trump’s Truancy

Poland: Why the America We Knew Is Gone*

South Korea: A Free Pass for Violence: The ‘Triple Collusion’ of Ronaldo, Trump and FIFA

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s Unconventional Diplomacy Will Come at High Cost for US Partners

Saudi Arabia: Will the Race to the Moon Create Conflicts in Space?

Philippines: A US Operative Conjures a Maritime Mirage While Trump Builds Peace with China

India: Arms Sale to Taiwan Deepens US-China Friction as Military Drills Intensify

Saudi Arabia: First US-UN Plan for Palestine Raises Hopes of Peace