In September 2011, protesters debouched into the center of Wall Street, the heart of global capitalism. They occupied the famous Zuccotti Park for two months. Neither the news channels on television nor the mainstream newspapers were solicitous about the movement and demonstrators. Meanwhile, the movement rambled over the social networks in waves. They called themselves the Occupy Wall Street movement.
What Did They Want?
The protesters in Zuccotti Park rose against unfair distribution of national income, financial greed and enslavement, tutelage of big companies over politics, underutilization of tax revenues, human-caused environmental damage and wars. These protestors had perceptible causes. They had a declaration in written documents. They conglomerated around the slogan, “We are the 99 percent. We revolt against the 1 percent.” They remained stubbornly against the despotism of minority over majority. The first day of the protests in Gezi Park was reminiscent of OWS in Zuccotti Park because of its strong iterations of opposition — for Gezi Park protestors, the opposition was to the demolition of the trees in the park. But due to the disproportionate use of force by the police, Gezi Park protests soon found themselves no longer on the path of the OWS movement. OWS was a pacifistic and non-violent movement from its onset to its end. The protesters did not taunt or scoff at those of whom they did not approve. Come hell or high water, the spirit of OWS was against violence. Nevertheless, New York Police Department officers used excessive force against protesters and many activists were injured. During the process, more than 1000 activists who displayed passive resistance were taken into custody. Tear gas was fired. Shelter tents of the occupiers were removed by the NYPD. The protesters were not allowed to continue holding their placards in Zuccotti Park. The movement eventually lost its place in time, but it had at least been successful in dispensing with aggression and remained standing where it had commenced. The movement in Taksim Gezi Park, on the other hand, took yet another turn. Violence begot violence, and the movement, which had started with the idea of protecting the trees, found itself in the center of aggression. Illegal groups got involved in the continuum, and the picture changed completely, to the detriment of Turkey.
The Cost of Protests
The OWS movement did not leave a serious and costly burden on the back of the United States. The New York Stock Exchange was not affected. Cities and government vehicles were not damaged. In contrast, the visible cost of demonstrations that began in Gezi Park is estimated to be over $1 billion. Financial damage continues to pile up after stock market prices fell sharply during the early hours of the first day, and the protests are hitting the tourism industry hard, with cancellations affecting the entire sector. What is more, there is an unpredictable amount of security expense and wreckage in urban areas. Turkey's economy is losing too much because of this movement.
Gezi protestosu Wall Street'e benzemez.
OWS hareketinin ABD'ye ciddi bir maliyeti olmadı. Onların somut talepleri vardı. Oysa Gezi Parkı protestosunun ülkeye maliyeti çok büyük
Eylül 2011'de dünya kapitalizminin merkezi olan Wall Street'te ortaya çıktılar. Meşhur Zuccotti Parkı'nı yaklaşık iki ay işgal ettiler. Haber televizyonları bu eyleme yayınlarında ilgi göstermedi. Ana akım gazetelerde de ciddi bir yer bulamadılar. Fakat hareket sosyal medyada dalga dalga yayıldı. Onlar kendilerine Occupy Wall Street (OWS) hareketi diyorlardı.
NE İSTİYORLARDI?
Zuccotti Park'ta eylemciler gelir dağılımındaki adaletsizliğe, finans sektörünün herkesi köleleştirmesine, dev şirketlerin siyaseti kontrol etmesine, vergilerin doğru yerlerde kullanılmamasına, çevreye verilen zarara ve savaşlara isyan ediyorlardı. Somut olarak talepleri belliydi. Yazılı dökümanları vardı. "Biz yüzde 99'uz ve yüzde 1'e isyan ediyoruz" sloganı etrafında bir araya gelerek azınlığın çoğunluğa tahakkümüne karşı çıkıyorlardı. Gezi Parkı'nda ağaçları korumak üzere toplanan eylemcileri protestonun ilk günü bazı yönlerden Zuccotti Park'ı işgal eden OWS hareketine benzetmek mümkün. Fakat polisin orantısız güç kullanımı ile Taksim Gezi Parkı'ndaki eylemin görünümü OWS hareketinden uzaklaştı. OWS her şeyden önce sonuna kadar pasif ve barışçıldı. Beğenmediklerine, kendileri gibi düşünmeyenlere hakaret yoktu. Ne olursa olsun şiddet OWS'nin ruhuna tersti. NYPD orantısız güç kullanarak pek çok eylemciyi yaraladı. Bu süreç içinde pasif direniş gösteren eylemcilerden binden fazlası gözaltına alındı. Biber gazı sıkıldı. Çadırlar polis tarafından kaldırıldı. Eylemcilerin parkta gösteri ve protestolarına devam etmelerine izin verilmedi. Hareket zaman içinde eylemselliğini yitirdi. Fakat hareket kendini provokasyonlardan koruyarak başladığı noktada durmayı başardı. Taksim Gezi Parkı eylemi ise bambaşka bir hal aldı. Şiddet şiddeti doğurdu ve ağaçları koruma fikriyle buluşan kitle bir anda kendini provokasyonların merkezinde buldu. İllegal örgütler sürece dahil oldu ve resim Türkiye'nin aleyhine tamamen değişti.
EYLEMLERİN MALİYETİ
OWS hareketinin ABD'ye ciddi bir maliyeti olmadı. Borsa etkilenmedi. Şehirler tahrip edilmedi. Kamu araçlarına zarar verilmedi. Fakat Taksim Gezi Parkı'nda başlayan ve şekil değiştiren eylemlerin "görünür" maliyeti milyar doları aşacak düzeyde seyrediyor. Borsadaki düşüş, turizm sektöründeki iptaller, şehirlerin gördüğü zarar, kamu mallarına yapılan saldırılar ve güvenlik için harcanan paralarla birlikte maliyet sürekli artıyor. Ve Türkiye ekonomisi kaybediyor.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Even Jake Sullivan, former United States president Joe Biden’s national security adviser, said “the Washington Consensus is a promise that was not kept[.]”
Yet, over the long term, tilting towards the US doesn't seem to be the natural choice, especially when America is looking to re-shore manufacturing and disengage from China-centric supply chains.
And the man behind “Vision 2030” has shown that he is well aware that the U.S. can offer Saudi Arabia what few others can: economically, politically, in defense, in technology, and in artificial intelligence, the new key to progress.
Even Jake Sullivan, former United States president Joe Biden’s national security adviser, said “the Washington Consensus is a promise that was not kept[.]”
While Washington claims Tehran desires an agreement, Iran insists no dialogue will take place without the lifting of sanctions and guarantees respecting its nuclear rights.
Senator Ted Cruz's warning to the Christian establishment about the rise of antisemitism on the American Right applies equally to the Israeli establishment. This poison is spreading among young Christians who will form America's leadership in the next generation.
The crown prince’s historic visit to the US this week crowned these bilateral relations, elevating Saudi Arabia to the status of a major non-NATO ally and a trusted strategic partner.
While China has warned of serious consequences and may impose sanctions, the U.S. frames the sale as a necessary sustainment measure for existing aircraft rather than an escalation.