Why Not Undertake Win-Win Cooperation in the United States' Backyard?

Published in Jinghua
(China) on 28 May 2013
by Jia Xiudong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Leonard Fung. Edited by Kathleen Weinberger.
When China's leaders visit Latin America, it is not to undermine the U.S. in its own backyard. China and the U.S. both have the ability and wisdom to create a winning outcome for all three sides by leveraging their respective advantages.

Recently, there have been two pieces of news concerning Latin America that have attracted international attention.

One has been President Xi Jinping's planned trip from May 31 to June 6 to Trinidad and Tobago, Costa Rica and Mexico. The other has been U.S. Vice President Joseph Biden's trip to Colombia, Trinidad and Tobago, and Brazil.

The media paid particular attention to the fact that Xi Jinping's Trinidad trip will take place three days after Biden's. Also, U.S. President Barack Obama traveled to Mexico and Costa Rica in late April to early May; shortly thereafter, in early mid-May, Vice President Li Yuanchao chose Argentina and Venezuela as the destinations for his first foreign trip in his new role.

Is the consecutive timing of these visits in Latin America and the Caribbean mere coincidence, or does it reflect Sino-U.S. competition in the region? In response to this question posed at a routine press conference on May 21, China's foreign ministry spokesperson expressed that China maintains favorable bilateral relations with each country in Latin America, and that China and the U.S. are both entirely free to exploit their respective strengths in pursuing cooperation and playing a positive role in the development of Latin American countries.

On a related note, at the White House background briefing on May 22 for Biden's trip, a reporter commented that Xi Jinping's planned trip closely follows Biden's and asked: "Is there any concern that the Chinese showing up a few days later and perhaps making a lot of announcements about new investment in the region might undercut the perception of U.S. commitment to Latin America?" A senior White House official responded that the U.S. is not in competition over any particular country in Latin America.

Latin America is the United States' "backyard." In the early 19th century, the U.S. pursued the Monroe Doctrine to expel European influence from the region. During the Cold War, the U.S. competed with the Soviet Union for spheres of influence in a malignant triangular relationship. In recent years, with the continuous rise of Chinese influence in Latin America, people have started to notice the emergence of a new kind of triangular relationship.

With regard to the China factor in Latin America, overall public opinion in the region has been positive and welcoming. In the U.S., some see it as a threat while some are welcoming, with prevailing sentiments being that China's strategic intent is still unclear and that further observation of its impact on U.S. strategic interests is needed. However, one point of consensus across the American and Latin American public is that the U.S. can no longer be the sole hegemon in Latin America. China's presence and influence in the region has given Latin America room for choice.

Sino-Latin American relations began late, but are advancing rapidly. They are based on shared interests and win-win cooperation, and have no intention of harming legitimate U.S. interests in the region. Both China and the U.S. are cognizant of the importance of improving their understanding of Latin American affairs and building mutual trust; the two countries' foreign ministries regularly consult with one another on Latin American issues under the framework of the Strategic and Economic Dialogue. Aside from the in-depth exchange of views on the Latin American regional situation, as well as their respective relations and policies toward the region, both sides are starting to explore the question of how to pursue mutually beneficial cooperation.

When China's leaders visit Latin America, it is not to undermine the U.S. in its own backyard. China and the U.S. both have the ability and wisdom to create a winning outcome for all three sides by leveraging their respective strengths and cooperating through bilateral and multilateral channels in Latin America.


中国领导人访问拉美,并非到美国的“后院”挖美国的“墙脚”。中美两国有能力、有智慧凭借各自优势,实现中国、美国和拉美三方共赢。

  近日,有两条关于拉美的消息吸引了国际舆论的目光。

  一是习近平主席将于5月31日至6月6日出访特立尼达和多巴哥、哥斯达黎加、墨西哥三国。另一条是美国副总统拜登启程访问哥伦比亚、特立尼达和多巴哥、巴西三国。

  媒体还特别注意到,在拜登访问特多3天后,习近平将到访该国;美国总统奥巴马则于4月底、5月初访问了墨西哥和哥斯达黎加。此外,李源潮副主席履新后于5月中上旬开展的首次外访选择了阿根廷和委内瑞拉。

  中美领导人近期先后访问拉丁美洲和加勒比海地区,这是一种巧合,还是反映出两国在拉美的竞争?这个问题正是媒体在5月21日中国外交部例行记者会上向发言人提出的。外交部发言人表示,中国与拉美各国保持良好的双边关系,中美完全可以发挥各自优势,在拉美开展合作,共同为拉美国家的发展发挥积极作用。

  无独有偶,在5月22日美国白宫为拜登出访举行的背景吹风会上,有记者问,拜登和习近平前后脚访问拉美地区,美方是否担心中方几天后宣布很多新的投资等成果会削弱美国对拉美的承诺在人们心目中的印象?白宫高级官员回答说,美国并没有在拉美同某一个特定国家进行竞争。

  拉美是美国的“后院”。早在19世纪,美国就开始奉行“门罗主义”,排挤欧洲在拉美的影响。在上世纪冷战期间,美苏在拉美争夺势力范围,这是一种恶性三角关系。近年来,随着中国在拉美地区影响的不断增加,人们开始关注一个新三角关系的出现。

  对于中国因素在拉美的凸显,拉美地区的舆论总体上持积极、欢迎的态度,而美国舆论有的视之为“威胁因素”,有的表示欢迎,更多的则认为中国在拉美的战略意图尚不够明朗,对美国战略利益的影响还需要进一步观察。但有一点是美国和拉美舆论基本一致的,美国在拉美地区已不可能实现霸权。中国在拉美的存在和影响的上升增加了拉美国家的选择余地。

  中国与拉美关系起步晚,但进展快。双方关系以共同利益为基础,是互利共赢的,无意损害美国在拉美地区的正当利益。中美双方已认识到就拉美事务增进了解、加强互信的重要性,两国外交部门在战略与经济对话框架下就拉美事务定期举行磋商。双方除就拉美地区形势、各自同拉美关系和对拉美政策深入交换看法外,已开始涉足两国在拉美地区开展互利合作问题。

  中国领导人访问拉美,并非到美国的“后院”挖美国的“墙脚”。中美两国有能力、有智慧凭借各自优势,通过双边和多边渠道在拉美地区进行合作,实现中国、美国和拉美三方共赢。

  本报特约评论员贾秀东
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Topics

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Related Articles

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

Previous article
Next article