Afghanistan's Future

Published in El Nuevo Diario
(Nicaragua) on 01 July 2013
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Claudia V. Tabora. Edited by Keith Armstrong.
President Obama's decision to negotiate directly with the Taliban in Qatar, with no other precondition than never to let Afghanistan become a terrorist haven again, has shaken President Karzai's government.

But what led to the predicted scenario that has further shaken [Karzai’s government] is a political office with the practical rank of an embassy that flaunted the Taliban flag in the wind along with a plaque with the inscription, "Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan," one week before its opening. President Obama has been forced to explain himself and suspend initial talks with the Taliban after an angry Karzai broke off negotiations with the U.S. to keep American troops in Afghanistan after their scheduled departure next year.

For the main players, the countdown that will seal Afghanistan’s future has begun after more than 10 years of war. The peace talks will require all involved to make difficult decisions. For president Obama, it will be no easy task to express his public opinion at the beginning of talks with an opponent that has not been defeated and continues to kill American soldiers. The same can be said about the Taliban, who have scored talks with the West.

Its most radical leaders, who feel invincible due to their ability to keep the war going, will fight until the final farewell of NATO, for [they] understand what is most politically profitable. However, the Taliban's strategy to keep fighting while negotiating might prove difficult to explain to many of their fanatical jihadists.

The peace talks are decisive for Karzai, the weakest link, who, after agreeing to participate in the talks, has changed his mind and affirmed that his government, illegitimate to the Taliban, will not get involved in the talks until they are just between Afghans. It is imperative for Karzai, who has one more year in power, to assert his precarious authority in the face of what the future might hold, despite his dependence on foreign troops and money to maintain power.

Karzai, who seems to be losing footing, refuses to be marginalized by a possible agreement between the U.S. and the Taliban. This is a distant but plausible possibility, since the insurgents have been portrayed in Doha as an alternative government to Kabul's.


La decisión de Obama de negociar directamente con los talibanes en Catar, sin otra precondición conocida que la de no volver a hacer de Afganistán un trampolín planetario del terrorismo islamista, ha sacudido al Gobierno del presidente Karzai.

Pero más lo ha hecho que el escenario previsto sea una oficina política con rango práctico de Embajada, que en su inauguración la semana pasada lució bandera talibán al viento y una placa con la leyenda Emirato Islámico de Afganistán. Washington se ha visto obligado a dar explicaciones y congelar su primer encuentro con los insurgentes, después de que un iracundo Karzai suspendiera las conversaciones con EE.UU. sobre los términos de su presencia militar en Afganistán tras su retirada el año próximo.

Para los principales implicados ha comenzado la cuenta atrás que va a sellar el inmediato futuro del país centroasiático después de 10 años de guerra. El final de la gran partida afgana implica decisiones difíciles para todos. Para Obama no es la menor presentar a su opinión pública el comienzo de negociaciones de paz con un enemigo que no ha sido vencido y sigue matando a soldados estadounidenses. También para los talibanes, ganadores del gigantesco pulso con Occidente.

Sus jefes más radicales, convencidos de la fortaleza que les otorga ser capaces de mantener la iniciativa bélica, estarían por combatir hasta el adiós definitivo de la OTAN, por entender qué es lo más rentable políticamente. Pero la estrategia de seguir luchando mientras se negocia puede no ser fácil de justificar ante muchos de sus fanatizados yihadistas.

El proceso en marcha resulta decisivo para Karzai, el eslabón más endeble, que tras aceptar inicialmente un diálogo a tres bandas, afirma ahora que su Gobierno -ilegítimo para los talibanes- no irá a Catar mientras las negociaciones de paz no sean totalmente entre afganos. Para el cuestionado Karzai, a quien le queda un año de mandato, resulta vital reafirmar su precaria autoridad ante el desenlace que se avecina, pese a su dependencia de tropas y dinero extranjeros para mantenerse en el poder.

Karzai, a quien los acontecimientos se le escapan progresivamente de las manos, se resiste a quedar marginado por un eventual entendimiento entre Washington y los talibanes. Un horizonte distante, pero verosímil tras la presentación de los insurgentes en Doha como un Gobierno alternativo al de Kabul.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Taiwan: Can Benefits from TikTok and Taiwan Be Evaluated the Same Way?

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Topics

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Related Articles

Nicaragua: Trump’s Trade War Will Not Make America ‘Great Again’

China: Nicaragua Withdraws from OAS, Denounces Yankee Imperialism

Guatemala: Defending Freedom against Tyrants

Taiwan: Expert Eye: Is Taiwan a Democratic Commodity in the US-Chinese Trials of Strength?

Czech Republic: The Farce Looks a Little Different