Could We Have Avoided Navy Yard?

Published in L'Express
(France) on 18 September 2013
by Philippe Coste (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Charlotte Schwennsen. Edited by Chris J. deGrazia.
Twelve dead, one crazy shooter, the same questions. Aaron Alexis, the perpetrator of the Sept. 17 carnage within the Navy Yard, administrative offices of the U.S. Marines in Washington, had been hearing voices for years and had complained to police, during a stay at a hotel one month prior, of mysterious tormentors that “[were] sending vibrations into his body” via the microwave in his room. He was discharged from the military reserves in 2011 after numerous incidents. However, his record, expurgated following an appeal, revealed no problem, which allowed him to pursue a career as a civil contractor in the armed forces. Alexis, responsible for two incidents with firearms, committed himself to a psychiatric hospital twice. His schizophrenia, however, was never the object of follow-up. For Professor E. Fuller Torrey, psychiatrist of military hospitals, the drama might illustrate “fifty years of failing America’s mentally ill.”* But could we have forcibly detained the patient? Nothing was tried when he shot the tire of a badly parked car near his home in Seattle or when he accidentally — according to him — shot through the roof of a neighbor’s apartment.

All the same, what about gun control? If this individual had been declared mentally ill, he would not have been able to acquire a weapon so easily. The armorer in Virginia had elsewhere scrupulously followed the regulation by earlier refusing to immediately reissue an AR-15 assault rifle, by reason of Alexis’ residence in another state. That did not prevent him from purchasing a shotgun and buckshot (the size of ball bearings) to tinker with and make deadly. For the moment, the Navy Yard shooting has not raised any comment from the National Rifle Association — the lobby for the right to carry arms, much maligned during the Newtown massacre — and the U.S. media have been guarded on this subject, content with showing moving eulogies for the 12 victims.

* Editor's Note: This is the title of a book by E. Fuller Torrey.


Navy Yard Pouvait-on l’éviter?

Philippe Coste

12 morts, un tueur fou, et les mêmes questions. Aaron Alexis, l’auteur du carnage du 17 septembre dans l’enceinte du Navy Yard, bureaux administratifs de la Marine américaine à Washington, entendait des voix depuis des années, et s’était plaint à la police, lors d’un séjour à l’hôtel un mois plus tôt, de mystérieux tourmenteurs qui « envoyaient des vibrations dans son corps » via le four à micro-ondes de sa chambre. A la suite de plusieurs incidents, il avait été exclu de la réserve militaire en 2011, mais son dossier, expurgé à la suite d’un recours, ne laissait transparaître aucun problème, ce qui lui avait permis de poursuivre une carrière de contractuel civil des forces armées. Alexis, responsable de deux incidents avec des armes à feu, s’est lui-même présenté deux fois dans un service psychiatrique. Sa schizophrénie n’a pourtant fait l’objet d’aucun suivi. Pour le professeur E. Fuller Torrey, psychiatre des hôpitaux militaires, le drame illustre « cinquante ans de déliquescence des politiques de santé publique américaine ». Mais aurait-on pu interner le malade de force ? Rien n’avait été tenté lorsqu’il avait tiré dans les pneus d’une camionnette mal garée près de chez lui à Seattle, ou, selon lui accidentellement, à travers son plafond, dans l’appartement d’une voisine.

De même, que dire du contrôle des armes à feu ? Si cet individu avait été déclaré malade mental, il n’aurait pu acheter une arme à feu aussi facilement. L’armurier de Virginie a d’ailleurs scrupuleusement suivi la règlementation en refusant de lui remettre immédiatement une arme d’assaut du type AR 15, en raison de sa résidence dans un autre Etat. Cela ne l’a pas empêché d’acheter un fusil de chasse et d’en bricoler la chevrotine (de la taille de roulements à billes) pour la rendre mortelle. Pour l’instant, la fusillade de Navy Yard n’a suscité aucun commentaire de la National Rifle Association, le lobby du droit au port d’arme tant décrié lors du massacre de Newtown, et le media américains se sont bien gardés d’aborder ce terrain, se contentant d’éloges funèbres émouvants des 12 victimes.
Commentaires : (0 ) | Trackbacks : (
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession