The Libor Scandal Worsens in the US

Published in Echos
(France) on 17 March 2014
by Anne Drif (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Michael Krimian. Edited by Bora Mici.
A different tune is being played in the United States following the manipulation rates scandal by Libor, an inter-banking lending market. While the numbers of prosecutions are still low, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the deposits guarantee agency, decided on Friday to take action on the matter. The FDIC, which has tutelary authority on more than 5,000 financial institutions, announced that it filed a complaint against 16 international banks and accuses them of predatory behavior against a dozen small American banks, which today have all disappeared.

"Substantial Losses"

Among the European banks under scrutiny are: UBS, Deutsche Bank, RBS, Barclays, Credit Suisse, HSBS, Rabobank, Lloyds Banking Group, West LB and Société Générale, the only French Bank inculpated. The FDIC also incriminates the British Bank Association, in charge of monitoring Libor share pricing in London. Two major American institutions are also under scrutiny: Bank of America and CitiGroup. By together manipulating the price at which banks lend to each other, particularly during the crisis as they revealed how unsound they were, these banks entailed "substantial losses" between 2007 and 2011 for 38 banks placed under the aegis of the FDIC, according to the FDIC, Washington Mutual and IndyMac Bank. As far as the FDIC is concerned, these big financial institutions have broken their contracts with the smaller banks which were forced to close. These contracts were made—including the valorization of rates—after the big institutions had previously rigged the Libor rate. The FDIC thus seeks compensation for the amount of losses these small banks suffered, in addition to extra damages for the violation of antitrust laws. Overall, it demands a fine of more than $1 billion, according to The Financial Times.

Only Freddy Mac and Fannie Mae, refinancing entities, have filed official complaints of this scale. Some banks were found guilty at an individual level by regulators. In 2011, UBS unraveled the scandal to the regulators in order to gain immunity but was fined 1.1 billion euros. Barclays eschewed legal prosecutions by paying £290 million in 2012 to American regulators in part. RBS followed Barclays’ steps in February 2013 and paid 450 million euros to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the American Department of Justice.

Only the European Commission has launched a series of fines. In December, it found five banks, including Société Générale, guilty of cartel-driven behavior, who were fined 1.7 billion euros. In total and globally, the different banks implicated in the Libor scandal have eschewed legal prosecutions by paying $6 billion in fines.


Changement de ton aux Etats-Unis dans le scandale de manipulation des taux interbancaires. Alors que les mises en cause se comptent encore au compte-gouttes, l'agence fédérale américaine de garantie des dépôts, la FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Group) a décidé de renchérir vendredi. L'autorité de tutelle de plus de 5.000 établissements financiers a annoncé qu'elle portait plainte contre seize banques internationales, les accusant d'avoir lésé une dizaine de petites banques américaines qui ont, aujourd'hui, disparu.
« Pertes substantielles »

Parmi les banques européennes, sont mises en cause UBS, Deutsche Bank, RBS, Barclays, Credit Suisse, HSBC, Rabobank, Lloyds Banking Group, West LB, ainsi que la Société Générale, l'unique banque française incriminée. Elle attaque aussi l'association des banques britanniques, la BBA, chargée de superviser la cotation à Londres du Libor. Mais deux grands établissements américains sont aussi sur le gril, Bank of America et Citigroup. En cherchant à orienter de concert le taux auquel les banques se prêtent entre elles, en particulier lors de la crise car il pouvait révéler leurs difficultés, ces banques ont entraîné entre 2007 et 2011 « des pertes substantielles » pour 38 banques qui avaient été placées sous l'administration de la FDIC, estime cette dernière, en particulier Washington Mutual et IndyMac Bank. Pour l'agence en effet, ces grandes institutions financières ont rompu des contrats noués avec ces banques qui ont dû fermer, en faussant le taux du Libor auquel ces mêmes contrats étaient liés et qui en fixait la valorisation. L'agence américaine cherche donc à récupérer des indemnités égales aux pertes essuyées par ces petites banques, ainsi que des dommages supplémentaires pour violation des lois antitrust. En général, elle exige des amendes de plus de 1 milliard de dollars, selon le « Financial Times ».

Seuls les organes de refinancement Freddie Mac et Fannie Mae ont officiellement lancé des plaintes à grande échelle. Des banques ont été condamnées à titre individuel par des régulateurs. En 2011, UBS, déclenche le scandale auprès des régulateurs pour gagner son immunité, mais paie 1,1 milliard d'euros. Barclays ensuite s'acquitte de 290 millions de livres en 2012, pour partie au régulateur américain, suivi en février 2013 de RBS. Celui-ci a versé 450 millions d'euros, pour partie à la CFTC américaine et au département américain de la Justice.

Seule la Commission européenne s'est lancée dans des amendes en série. En décembre, elle a condamné 5 banques pour cartel pour 1,7 milliard d'euros, dont la Société Générale. Au total, les banques se seraient acquittées de 6 milliards de dollars d'amende dans ce scandale dans le monde.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Canada: Minnesota School Shooting Is Just More Proof That America Is Crazed

Topics

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession