Facing US Media Ridicule, China Has No Need for Anger

Published in Qianjiang Evening News
(China) on 17 April 2014
by Liu Xuesong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Mollie Gossage. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
“China’s Claims Have Delayed the Search for MH 370.” America’s Fox News Network republished the New York Times report on April 15, accompanied by this title. The New York Times’ original title for its article was “Chinese Claims in Malaysia Plane Hunt Reportedly Seen as Slowing Down Search." The Global Times believes that although the title is fairly polite, the subject nevertheless comes down to this — China “slowed down” the search for the Malaysia Airlines passenger jet.

Whether or not China hindered the aircraft search and rescue is obviously not determined by what The New York Times says. As the country with the most victims in this air disaster, China’s concern and respect for the 154 lives are clearly there for everyone to see.

So-called “Chinese claims” undoubtedly indicate the information from China’s Haixun 01 concerning “underwater signals perhaps from the missing plane," which was issued on April 5. This clue, later negated by news from Australia’s prime minister, has now become grounds for certain U.S. media to mock China. They complain with the borrowed voices of anonymous U.S. Defense Department officials and analysts that China’s announcement was “intended to project competence, but only served to distract and delay the search effort.”
  
MH 370 has been missing for 40 days now; affirmation and negation, negative and affirmative clues abound, so why does the U.S. media pick at China’s wounds? This is beyond the understanding of any self-respecting Chinese citizen, who may also reasonably feel severely offended. In truth, the U.S. media is hiding contradictions within its report — not in the divisions between the U.S. and Chinese surrounding China’s management of the Malaysian flight incident, but in inciting the antagonistic mood between China and Malaysia.

There is still no trace of MH 370, and the U.S. media indicates China is to blame. Actually, wishing to vilify China, other countries participating in the search — especially those Southeast Asian countries which already feel opposed China — also intend to provoke the Chinese people’s antipathy against government policy, thus killing two birds with one stone. So while this report states that “at present, many ships in the south Indian Ocean participating in the search are Chinese ships,” on the other hand it describes the Chinese government’s humanitarian sentiments and responsible image as a world power as “a prime opportunity for the Chinese government to demonstrate its determination and technological abilities to its domestic audience." However, The New York Times’ dishonoring taunts have instead provided an unexpected lesson in patriotism for many Chinese.

Actually, speaking of delays, since contact was lost with the Malaysian flight, there has been all kinds of chaotic information indicating north then south, east then west, raising the suspicions of people all over the world. Analyzing this in a more benevolent way, perhaps technology fell short; casting a more suspicious eye on the situation, perhaps there is an inside story that is difficult to uncover. However, certain U.S. media have entirely ignored the fact that the search technology may not have been up to the task, instead using the first clue that China publicized and that may have been proved to have been in error, using “hinder” to indicate blame. This kind of prejudice has already extended beyond the realm of a discussion of technology, towards disparaging a nation’s dignity. In the eyes of the Chinese people, this is unacceptable.
  
Objectively, when the facts of this Malaysian flight do someday come to light, it certainly will be possible to find disparities by comparing science and technology levels as well as between military and civil use. Even if the results are never clear, in comparing Chinese technology with that of other developed nations, the disparity is obvious. However, as “at present, many ships in the south Indian Ocean participating in the search are Chinese ships” — this exhibits China’s indefatigable pursuit of the missing souls, showing its muscle in the purest sense. One may see a kind of “political disunity” concerning human nature, morality and responsibility in the demeanor of certain U.S. media as they pursue their nation’s interests. This hides their motives — certainly Chinese people would be included in this — and there is a basic ability to determine right and wrong that people feel to be beneath them.

To ramble on in a different direction now. The media uses freedom of the press as an excuse. Whatever the political background or position, it is not worth China getting angry. MH 370 has been missing for 40 days, and there are only a few reports like the one in The New York Times which invert the truth to blame China. It’s not that other countries or other media are not brave enough to criticize China, but that the Chinese government and people performed blamelessly, if not flawlessly. Even in America, web users harshly critiqued this New York Times article.

So regardless of whether it’s the Chinese government or the Chinese people, with regard to this kind of media scandal, the best attitude which displays the dignity of a world power is not one of anger, nor of rebuttal, but one with an unwavering passion to promote the development of science and technology and continue the search for those missing souls. Even if there is only one last boat remaining in the Indian Ocean, suspended from that boat will certainly be the five-starred red flag of China. What China needs is to turn the warping and disparaging style of the New York Times article into a kind of motivation or energy, seeing the disparity of its own technological might, and thereby advance the solidity of its technical and equipment strength, becoming a major component of future national dignity.

Value the lives of the missing a bit more seriously, regard this groundless ridicule a little more lightly. This is the only fitting manner for a world power. China has no need for anger.


面对美媒贬损,中国无须动怒
  纽约时报一篇报道,经环球时报貌似很不经意的传播,顿时激怒了太多的中国人。
  “中国的声称耽误了MH370搜寻”,美国福克斯新闻网15日转载纽约时报的报道,并配以这样的标题。纽约时报这篇报道原标题是《中国在马航客机搜救中的行动被认为伤害和帮助一样多》。环球时报认为,虽然标题略微客气,但报道主题只有一个——中国“妨碍”了马航客机搜救。
  中国有没有妨碍马航客机搜救,显然不是纽约时报说了算的。作为在本次空难中公民受伤害最多的国家,中国对于154条生命的尊重与焦虑,世人皆知、有目共睹。
  所谓“中国的声称”,无疑指的是4月5日,中国“海巡01”号船发布的,关于“探查到了可能来自失联航班的水下信号”。这个后来被澳大利亚总理新闻发布所否定的线索,现在成了美国个别媒体讽刺中国的把柄。他们借由美国国防部匿名官员和分析人士之口埋怨:中国“这一声明的目的可能在于彰显其能力,但结果只会令搜寻人员分心并延误搜寻”。
  MH730失联40天来,肯定与否定、否定与肯定的线索比比皆是,美媒为什么单挑中国的刺?这是所有稍具自尊心的中国公民所无法理喻的,被触怒也在情理之中。事实上,美媒掩藏在报道中的矛盾节点,并不在中美两国舆论对于中国在马航事件处理上的分歧,而在挑起中马之间的舆论和情绪对立。
  MH370至今未见踪影,美媒直指中国误事,其实是既想通过对中国的污名化,造成参与搜寻的国家、特别是东南亚国家对中国的对立情绪,又想挑起中国国内民众对政府决策的反感情绪,可谓一箭双雕。所以,这篇报道一方面表示,“目前在南印度洋参与搜寻的大多数船只都是中国船只”,一方面将中国政府的人道主义情怀、负责任的大国形象,描述成“向本国国民彰显其意志力和技术能力的绝佳机会”。但纽约时报这番带有羞辱性质的嘲讽,却在许多中国人那里,收到了意想不到的爱国主义教育效果。
  其实要说耽误,马航失联之后,一次次各种指北向南、指西向东的信息乱象,给世人造成的猜疑更多。用善意的心态去分析,可能是技术的落后;用猜疑的目光去看待,可能是难以言表的内幕。但是,美国个别媒体无视全世界搜寻技术整体落后的事实,却将中国一次重要线索的公布可能被证明有误,用“妨碍”来指责,这种傲慢与偏见,已经超出了技术讨论的范围,而是对一个国家的国格的贬损。这在中国民众看来是罕见的,也是无法接受的。
  客观上,这次马航搜寻,未来一旦水落石出,确实能够比较出科学技术实力以及在军事和民事运用上的差距。即便结果未明,中国技术与发达国家相比,差距也是明显的。但是,将“目前在南印度洋参与搜寻的大多数船只都是中国船只”这个展示中国对失联生命不离不弃的不懈追寻,视作纯粹意义上的展示肌肉,足见个别美媒在国家利益的寻求过程中对于人性与道义、责任与风范的一种“政治失联”,其掩藏的用心,显然会被包括中国人在内的、有基本是非判断能力的人们所不屑。
  反过来,作为一家口不择言、却以新闻自由为借口的媒体,无论其政治背景如何,一惯立场如何,中国都犯不着动怒。MH370失联40天,像纽约时报这样指责中国、颠倒黑白的批评报道只有个别。不是别的国家别的媒体批评中国的胆子不够大,而是中国政府和民众在此次事件中的表现虽未必无可挑剔、却也无可指责。即便在美国,网民对于纽约时报这篇报道,也是批判有加。
  因此,中国无论政府还是公民,对于这类舆论风波,展示大国尊严的最佳姿态,不是动怒,不是辩驳,而是用不离不弃的激情与科学技术的发力,继续寻找那些失联的生命,哪怕南印度洋只剩下最后一条船只,船上悬挂的一定是五星红旗。中国需要的是将纽约时报式的扭曲与贬损,当成一种激励,一种能量,看到自己技术实力的差距,从而将技术力量的先进、装备力量的雄厚,当成未来树立大国尊严的重要组成部分。
  把失联的生命看得重些,将无端的贬损看得淡些。这才配得上大国的风范。中国用不着动怒。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: Expectations for New Pope To Mend Rifts among American People

OPD: 16 May 2025, edited by Helaine Schweitzer

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Cuba: The First Casualty

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Topics

Australia: Donald Trump Is So Convinced of His Mandate that He Is Battling the Courts

Australia: The US’s Biggest Export? Trump’s MAGA Mindset

Cuba: The First Casualty

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary