NED’s Awards Harass China

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 28 May 2014
by Yafei Di (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anthony Chantavy. Edited by Brent Landon.
The U.S. National Endowment for Democracy has recently decided to award the 2014 Democracy Award to imprisoned human rights activists Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong, with the award being given this week. From the start of this year, these anti-China activists have written essays aimed at Beijing’s political unrest of 25 years ago, making all kinds of “commemorations.” This year, NED choosing to grant Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong the Democracy Award, and arranging it at the end of May, probably cost a lot of trouble.

Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong are not very renowned in China. One reason is that the things they have done are not in sync with the Chinese public’s core concerns for a beautiful life. They have long been separated from mainstream Chinese society, long hovering in the fringes.

Liu and Xu were imprisoned for breaking the law. What they are most committed to doing is demonstrating to the Chinese community how to confront the existing national system. They believe that their practices have a spirit of sacrifice. They had assembled and received support from a few small groups in the country. Liu Xiaobo earned a Nobel Peace Prize in 2010, and Xu Zhiyong has also joined the ranks of Western awards in recent years.

The Chinese court’s decision to send Liu and Xu to prison was based on a great deal of information from the Chinese legal system and mainstream society. If this can be disputed, then only history is capable of looking back on today in the future. History’s foundation is definitely China’s footprint in its own chosen path and never will it be a justification or a moving speech from Liu, Xu, or their supporters.

Today, an easier way to determine the nature of Liu and Xu’s actions is to see who and how powerful their supporters are. Everyone knows what a Nobel Prize supposedly means, and NED can highlight this issue more clearly.

This foundation was established in 1983, at the peak of the Cold War, as new leverage when the Reagan administration believed the CIA had committed a few “inconvenient” acts. It is primarily funded by the U.S. government for all projects serving the national interests of the United States. NED helped Rabiye Qadir settle in the United States, as one example of something Chinese people are most likely to read about. Allen Weinstein, one of NED’s founders, said, “A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.”

As China continues to grow, American and Western European ideology awards have been given to Chinese people more and more frequently, but they almost overwhelmingly choose opponents of China’s current system, while China’s tremendously positive achievements go unnoticed. These awards are not only spiritual links between the Western forces and China’s adversaries, but have also become tools for the West to demonstrate against China’s political and legal systems.

Under the guise of “universal value,” China’s political adversaries openly allied with Western powers. When China emerged as a world power and sank into a geopolitical dispute with the United States, this alliance strengthened the West’s ability to play with China. We do not know whether those people who were confrontational in China and won awards from the West are just proud, moved or even ashamed to face their elders and countrymen for being leverage for the West against China.

We have nothing to say about NED. Harassing China’s modernization is its duty and responsibility. As for those Chinese “dissidents,” we cannot help but have hope. We can hope that they apply the interests of the country and its people to their personal pursuits, such as Liu Xiaobo’s experience of poverty in China and seeing the whole process of China’s current road to societal prosperity. Xu Zhiyong is old enough to help him establish definite historical vision. On top of that, they are both intellectuals and could easily understand why they are so popular in the West.

In the last 25 years, those who have fought against China's political system through illegal means have been the losers. Western support does not change this basic fact. China will continue to develop, and the West will continue to lose. They should not use the bad luck that curses their ancestral land in exchange for personal fortunes. That would be very immoral, and that curse will never come true.


美国国家民主基金会(NED)近日决定将2014年度的“民主奖”授予正在中国监狱中服刑的刘晓波和许志永,并将于本周“颁奖”。从今年伊始,境外一些反华势力就针对25年前北京发生的政治风波大做文章,搞各种“纪念活动”,NED选择今年向刘晓波和许志永授“民主奖”,而且“颁奖”安排在5月底,大概是费了一番苦心。

  刘晓波和许志永在中国大众中的知名度不算高,原因之一是他们做的事情同中国广大民众过美好生活的核心关切不合拍。他们早就脱离了中国主流社会,长期在边缘地带谋事徘徊。

  刘、许都因触犯中国法律而获刑,他们最热衷的事情是向中国社会示范同国家现行体制的对抗。他们认为自己的做法具有“牺牲精神”,他们在国内得到一些小圈子、小群体的支持,刘晓波获2010年诺贝尔和平奖,许志永也于近年加入到获西方奖项的行列。


  中国法院将刘、许依法送进监狱,这一裁决包含了来自中国法治体系和主流社会的巨大信息量。如果对此还可以有争议的话,那么只有历史才有资格在未来对今天的事情进行回顾。而历史的依据一定是中国在自己所选道路上留下的脚印,而决不会是刘、许及他们支持者的辩解和煽情。

  我们今天可以通过更简单的方法来判定刘、许所做事情的性质,那就是看看他们的支持者都是些什么人和力量。诺贝尔和平奖喜欢搞什么名堂已经众所周知,美国国家民主基金会能把这个问题彰显得更清楚。

  这个基金会成立于冷战高峰的1983年,是里根政府觉得中央情报局做有些事情“不方便”而特别搞出的新杠杆。它的资金主要由美国政府直接拨款,资助的所有项目都服务于美国的国家利益。NED帮助热比娅在美国安顿下来,是中国人最容易看懂的例子之一。NED创始人之一艾伦温斯坦说过:“我们今天做的许多事情就是25年前CIA偷偷摸摸做过的事情。”

  随着中国持续发展壮大,美国和西欧的各种意识形态奖项越来越频繁地颁给中国人,但它们差不多一边倒地选择了中国现行体制的对抗者,而中国巨大成就的正面建设者们几乎都与这些奖项无缘。这些奖项不仅是西方力量与那些对抗者之间的精神纽带,而且成为西方向中国政治及法律体系示威的工具。

  通过“普世价值”这个幌子,中国的政治对抗者们与西方力量公开结盟。在中国因为崛起为世界性力量而与美国深陷地缘政治纠葛时,这种结盟加强了西方同中国博弈的便利。我们不知道那些因在中国搞对抗而从西方获奖的人,他们仅仅为此骄傲、感动,还是同时也为自己成了西方试图“撬动中国”的杠杆,感到了面对父老乡亲的些许愧疚。

  我们对NED没什么话可说,骚扰中国现代化建设就是它的工作和职责。对中国那些被称为“异见人士”的人,我们却情不自禁抱有一线希望。但愿他们能把国家和人民的利益放在个人的“追求”之上,比如刘晓波经历了中国的贫困年代,看到了中国现行道路带给社会繁荣的全过程。许志永的年龄也足以帮助他建立一定的历史视距。加上都是高级知识分子,他们不难搞懂自己为什么在西方如此受欢迎。

  在最近25年中,那些通过非法手段对抗中国政治体制的人,都是失败者。西方的支持并不能改变这一基本事实。中国将继续发展,他们将继续是失败者。别用诅咒祖国的厄运来换取他们个人的时来运转。那样做很不道德,而且这样的诅咒决不会应验。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Turkey: Will the US Be a Liberal Country Again?

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Japan: ‘Department of War’ Renaming: The Repulsiveness of a Belligerent Attitude

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Topics

South Korea: Trump Halts Military Aid to Taiwan, and It Concerns Us, Too

Japan: ‘Department of War’ Renaming: The Repulsiveness of a Belligerent Attitude

Turkey: Will the US Be a Liberal Country Again?

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Related Articles

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US