Billionaires Taking Action against Billionaires

Published in De Groene Amsterdammer
(Netherlands) on 15 July 2014
by Eva de Valk (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Rolf Bruijn. Edited by Emily France.
In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed private individuals and companies to donate unlimited amounts of money to so-called super PACs, political organizations that are not officially tied to specific candidates, but in actuality finance their campaigns. Since the ruling, big money in the U.S. has had unprecedented power. During the presidential elections of 2012 alone, at least $546 million found its way into super PACs – probably more, because not all lobby groups are required to record their donations.

This must end, believes Harvard professor Larry Lessig. According to Lessig, through declaring the super PACs legal, in essence, corruption gets legalized. Money buys you influence. That used to be called corruption, but now, it is the norm. “It is no longer concealed, it is not illegal, and you do not even have to feel ashamed.”*

Therefore, Lessig founded his own super PAC, a super PAC that would end the influence of super PACs. His project is called "Mayday," named after the call for help by sailors and pilots in distress. Lessig’s super PAC is a call for the salvation of democracy from its doom by fighting the PACs through their own methods: By financially supporting those politicians who make efforts to reform the political system in order to decrease the influence of money, he wants to campaign against those members of Congress who maintain tight connections with their sponsors. “Ironic? Yes. Embrace the irony,” states the Mayday website.

Lessig targets the larger public through his cry of distress. Through a crowd-funding event, he hopes to collect $12 million in small donations from “regular Americans.” Already $5 million have been collected. The act of donating money to Mayday must be seen as “paying a ransom to get our democracy back,” according to the website, because “all Americans combined are able to defeat the billionaire super PACs.”**

The irony continues. Several billionaires from Silicon Valley together agreed to match the donations made by regular Americans. Among them is PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel, an investor with pronounced libertarian views. For example, in 2012, Thiel donated $4.7 million to a super PAC associated with Republican politician Rand Paul.

Yet, the support from these billionaires does not clash with the goals of Mayday, says Lessig in response to a question by the tech blog Valleywag.

“If Mayday succeeds in reducing the influence of money on politics, they will have less influence than now.”***

*Editor’s note: The original quotation, accurately translated, could not be verified.

**Editor's note: The quotation has been paraphrased by the author.

***Editor’s note: The quotation has been paraphrased by the author. The original quotations is significantly different and says, "If MAYDAY PAC is successful at reducing the influence of money and politics then Reid and Facebook and the others don't have as much power as they have right now."


Miljardairs voeren actie tegen miljardairs

San Francisco – In 2010 stond het Amerikaanse Hooggerechtshof particulieren en bedrijven toe om onbeperkt geld te geven aan zogeheten super-PACs: politieke organisaties die formeel los staan van specifieke kandidaten, maar in feite wel hun campagne financieel steunen.

Sinds de uitspraak heeft het grote geld in de VS ongekend veel macht. Alleen al tijdens de presidentsverkiezingen van 2012 ging er minstens 546 miljoen dollar naar super-PACs – waarschijnlijk meer, want niet alle lobbygroepen hoeven hun donaties te registreren.

Dat moet afgelopen zijn, vindt Harvard-hoogleraar Larry Lessig. Door de super-PACs legaal te verklaren, wordt corruptie in feite gelegaliseerd, aldus Lessig. Met geld kun je invloed kopen. Vroeger heette dat omkoping, nu is het de normale gang van zaken. ‘Het is niet langer verborgen, het is niet illegaal, je hoeft je er niet eens voor te schamen.’

Lessig heeft daarom zelf een super-PAC opgericht: een super-PAC die de invloed van super-PACs moet beëindigen. Zijn project heet Mayday, naar de roep om hulp van zeelieden en piloten in nood. Lessigs super-PAC is een oproep om de democratie van haar ondergang te redden, door de PACs te bestrijden met hun eigen middelen: hij wil campagne voeren tegen Congresleden die bijzonder nauwe banden onderhouden met hun geldschieters, en financiële ondersteuning geven aan politici die zich inzetten voor hervorming van het politiek systeem zodat geld minder invloed krijgt. ‘Ironisch? Ja. Omarm de ironie’, zo staat op de Mayday-website.

Lessig richt zijn noodkreet aan het grote publiek: via een crowdfundingactie hoopt hij twaalf miljoen dollar op te halen aan kleine donaties van ‘gewone Amerikanen’. De eerste vijf miljoen is al binnen. Geld doneren aan Mayday moet gezien worden als ‘het betalen van losgeld om onze democratie terug te krijgen’, aldus de website. Want: ‘Alle Amerikanen samen zijn in staat om de super-PACs van miljardairs te verslaan.’

Maar de ironie gaat verder. Verschillende miljardairs uit Silicon Valley hebben gezamenlijk beloofd dat ze de donaties van gewone Amerikanen verdubbelen. Daaronder bevindt zich PayPal-medeoprichter Peter Thiel, een investeerder met uitgesproken libertaire opvattingen. Zo doneerde Thiel in 2012 4,7 miljoen dollar aan een super-PAC die wordt geassocieerd met de Republikeinse politicus Rand Paul.

Toch is de steun van deze miljardairs niet inconsistent met de doelstellingen van Mayday, zegt Lessig in reactie op vragen van techblog Valleywag. ‘Als het Mayday lukt om de invloed van geld op de politiek te verminderen, hebben zij minder invloed dan nu.’
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Ceasefire

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Topics

Japan: Reckless Government Usage of Military To Suppress Protests

Mexico: The Military, Migrants and More

Australia: NATO Aims To Flatter, but Trump Remains Unpredictable

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Iran and Israel: a Fragile Ceasefire

India: US, Israel and the Age of Moral Paralysis

Singapore: Iranian Response in Qatar Was Specifically Targeted at Washington – ‘We Are Done’

Sri Lanka: Pakistan’s Nobel Prize Nominee and War in Middle East

Related Articles

Taiwan: Democracy That Abandons the 3 Treasures

Hungary: The Bridge Is Too Low for Jeff Bezos’ Yacht

Netherlands: Biden Wants To Fight Populism with Popularism

Netherlands: Trump’s Legacy: An Active Supreme Court Leaves a New Mark on America

Netherlands: The US Senate Is Playing a Game of Russian Roulette That Will Have Worldwide Consequences