For the First Time, the US and China ‘Reconfirm Their Strategies’

Published in People's Daily
(China) on 12 July 2014
by Zhong Sheng (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Darius Vukasinovic. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
The sixth round of strategic and economic talks and the fifth round of high-level consultations over cultural exchange [between China and the U.S.] have both ended in success. The list of items enumerating the successes attained during the talks revealed bilateral cooperation on over 300 issues. Not only is this figure a new record, but the issues agreed upon were all items of genuine significance. Both countries clearly agreed on their desired plans for regional issues, as well on those complex issues that encompassed wide-ranging, global consideration.

As Premier Xi Jinping so poignantly indicated in his opening address at the meeting, cooperation between the U.S. and China is in the best interests of both countries and the rest of the world, whereas mutual confrontation would certainly result in a calamity for everyone. Both sides need to take a long and broad view of the path ahead, cooperate and support one another, avoid confrontation, seek the benefits inherent in mutual relations and wade through all situations that obstruct cooperation. There can be no room for mistrust in U.S.-China relations, and all problems that arise must be solved mutually. Neither country can afford to let issues lead them down garden paths. During the course of the meeting, President Obama also sent a written message stressing that the United States welcomed a composed, peaceful and prosperous rising China, and that it would strive hard to work together with China to create a new relationship between the superpowers. Even though complexities exist between the U.S. and China, the U.S. was determined to cooperate and define the mutual context of their overall relationship. Both countries’ leaders’ words were meaningful and heartfelt. The mutual spirit of cooperation generated applause. The agreement demonstrated that the U.S. and China had both worked hard, and that in a short time they had brushed aside the haze covering their relationship. It was a collaboration to create a new form of relationship between superpowers, and it “reconfirmed their strategies.”

Both sides “reconfirmed” each other’s strategic intents. The greatest hazards facing U.S.-China relations are irrational misunderstandings, and it’s becoming increasingly important that both sides work to communicate their strategies effectively. Throughout the meeting, both China and the U.S. strove to make their future strategic directions clear to one another. China emphasized its unswerving path towards peace, as well as its resolute desire to promote security and prosperity throughout the Asia-Pacific and the rest of the world. It said it wasn’t trying to squeeze the U.S. out of the Asia-Pacific in any way. The U.S. emphasized that its “pivot to Asia” strategy and alliance system was not directed at China and that it was not planning to contain China’s growth.

These statements were not mere foreign relations rhetoric; they were a reflection of the fundamental strategic orientations of both sides. Both China and the United States have realized that the world has changed fundamentally and that there is no place for a “New Cold War.” No one denies that we have entered the 21st century, and that we have left 20th century – and especially 19th century – thinking and conduct far behind us.

Both sides have taken effective steps to realize this “reconfirmation.” U.S.-China relations are extremely important in these times, and they are also one of the most complicated issues facing these countries. Both countries have areas in which they cooperate and in which they compete. There are even areas in which they compete while cooperating. For a long time, there have been concerns about these complex issues as we look into the distant future. If handled appropriately, it will be beneficial to both countries. If handled poorly, things could deteriorate into contention and then even further into conflict. The crucial point is that we need to eliminate all stops and proceed with a “proactive agenda” — to carry out our great intentions and to carry them out all the way through to their completion.

The following areas are probably worth considering: first, there are talks on bilateral investment treaties (BIT). Mutual trade and investment between China and the U.S. has already passed the $1 trillion mark. U.S. investment in China is expanding rapidly, and the U.S. has already become the second-largest destination for Chinese foreign investment. Many talks have been held on various investment protocols, and they are all progressing positively. In the interests of boosting trade and moving to a higher plateau of mutual economic benefit, both sides have agreed to step up the pace of these talks and to strive to complete them as quickly as possible.

The second area is responding to climate change. The U.S. and China are both confident and determined in reaching their respective 2020 goals for carbon emissions reduction. They are both cooperating on research into post-2020 carbon emissions reduction strategies, and they are both cooperating in attaining targets for clean energy production and energy conversation. This will be beneficial to the world today and will also be a gift to future generations. Such cooperation is an exciting example of the groundbreaking progress that is being made between China and the United States.

The third point is the strengthening of military relations. China’s navy is currently taking part in the “2014 Pacific Rim Exercises.” The U.S. and Chinese navies are actively negotiating for the establishment of norms for both the reporting of important military movements, and the safe conduct of military affairs in international waters. The U.S. and China have a long history of cultivating cooperation over these matters; they continue to work together toward overcoming resistances, establishing deeper mutual ties and fostering strategies to settle any key points of concern.

There is one more thing that needs to be said about the growing intimacy between the people of the U.S. and China. Both countries have, for some time, been investigating the potential for long-term business and study visas. If the citizens of both countries can enjoy longer visas, this will create more incentive for “letting those who talk about overseas travel to just go ahead and do it.” Contact opportunities between Chinese and American people will grow deeper and more numerous. Bonds and friendships between Americans and Chinese will also grow closer.

We have mutually “reconfirmed” all points on which we might diverge. Though it is inevitable that divisions in our alliance will always arise, the important point is that we must meet these differences with mutual respect. We must treat each other equally and bear in mind the maxim, “do not do to others what you would not have them do to you.” Those in the U.S. are also well aware of this famous phrase from a Chinese sage of ages past — “the golden rule.” Both sides need to take this phrase to heart and put it into practice. This is especially true for the United States, which must always strive to practice what it preaches.

Both China and the U.S. agree that there are no benefits to engaging in conflict on the open seas. There can also be no room for contradictions nor for disputes over ocean or land territorial rights. In fact, both China and the U.S. are guaranteeing freedom of sailing passage through the world’s oceans, and they realize that cooperating to protect regional security can only be in the best interests of everyone.

China and the U.S. are both superpowers. They both possess their own senses of dignity and responsibility. Engaging in “megaphone diplomacy” will just complicate matters and create issues. When problems arise, the U.S. and China will sit down and talk the matters through. Discussing problems and creating opportunities for cooperation are always the best policies.

Both the U.S. and China are bearing heavy responsibilities while building a new form of relationship between superpowers. Not only does this arduous struggle call for a “reconfirmation of strategies,” but even more importantly, it requires “actions that bring forth guarantees.” Both the U.S. and China have put their strategic consensus and earnest desires into fulfilling and transforming their ties, and these acts can only be favorable to both bilateral relations and the rest of the world at large.


人民日报钟声:中美关系的一次“战略再确认”
第六轮中美战略与经济对话和第五轮中美人文交流高层磋商已经成功闭幕。对话和磋商发表的成果清单共包含300多项合作成果,不仅数量创了纪录,而且内容实实在在,对两国在双边、地区、全球层面广泛领域的对话合作做出明确要求和规划。
习近平主席在本轮对话和磋商联合开幕式的致辞中指出,中美合作可以办成有利于两国和世界的大事,对抗则对两国和世界肯定是灾难。双方一定要登高望远,坚持合作,避免对抗,既造福两国,又兼济天下。中美之间有问题不可怕,关键要共同解决问题,不能被问题牵着鼻子走。奥巴马总统也在给对话磋商发来的书面致辞中强调,美国欢迎一个稳定、和平、繁荣的中国崛起,致力于与中国构建新型大国关系。尽管美中关系如此复杂,美方仍决心以合作来定义双方总体关系。
两国领导人语重心长,双方合作成果令人鼓舞,表明中美双方努力拨开了一段时间以来的阴霾,共同对构建新型大国关系做出“战略再确认”。
双方对彼此战略意图做出“再确认”。中美关系面临的最大风险是不理性的误解误判,双方加强战略沟通越来越重要。本轮对话和磋商中,中美都努力把自己的战略意图讲清楚、说明白。中国强调坚定不移走和平发展道路,坚定维护亚太和世界的和平、稳定、繁荣,不会寻求把美国“挤出亚洲”。美国强调其亚太“再平衡”战略和同盟体系不针对中国,无意围堵遏制中国。这不是外交辞令,反映了双方基本战略取向。中美双方都认识到,今天的世界已经发生深刻变化,“新冷战”没有任何市场。无论是谁,都不应身体进入21世纪,头脑和行动仍停留在20世纪甚至19世纪。
双方对如何有效合作进行“再确认”。中美关系是当今世界最重要,也是最复杂的双边关系之一。两国既有合作也有竞争,甚至在合作的同时也有竞争。这种复杂多元的局面恐怕会长期存在。处理得好,能造福双方;处理不好,则会滑向恶性竞争甚至冲突。关键要排除干扰,坚持推进“积极议程”,把好事办足、办好。如下几件事颇值得关注:
一是双边投资协定(BIT)谈判。目前中美相互投资存量已经超过1000亿美元,中国对美投资持续快速增长,美国已成为中国第二大海外投资目的地。协定已经谈了多轮,取得积极进展。双方应加紧工作,争取尽早谈成,为两国经贸关系转型升级提供新动力。
二是应对气候变化。中美都有信心和决心完成各自2020年减排目标,正在研究2020年后的减排方案,并在清洁能源、节能减排等领域深化合作。这是造福当代、功在千秋的事业,充分体现了中美合作不断进取、开拓的积极意义。
三是加强两军关系。中国海军舰艇编队正在夏威夷参加“2014—环太平洋军演”,两军正积极商谈重大军事行动通报机制和公海海域海空军事安全行为准则。中美两军不断培养合作习惯、抑制对抗思维,对深化互信、增强战略稳定至关重要。
还有一件和两国民众密切相关的事。中美正在共同探讨延长商务和留学人员签证有效期。如果两国民众获得更长的签证有效期,会进行更多“说走就走的旅行”。中美人民交往更多更深,合作与友好的纽带就将越拉越紧。
双方对如何管控分歧进行了“再确认”。中美之间难免存在各种分歧,关键要相互尊重、平等相待,做到“己所不欲、勿施于人”。美方也认同这句中国古代先贤的哲言是“黄金法则”,双方都要切实把这一法则落实到行动上,特别是美方要言行一致。中美双方都同意,双方在“海上”没有直接利益冲突和不可调和的矛盾,美国表示在有关领土主权和海洋权益争端中不持立场。事实上,中美在维护航行自由、保障海上安全方面拥有重要共同利益,完全可以有效开展合作。中美作为两个大国,都有自己的尊严和责任,搞“麦克风外交”只会使问题更复杂。遇到麻烦事,中美坐下来有话好好说、建设性合作才是正招。
中美构建新型大国关系任重而道远,不仅需要“战略再确认”,更需要“行动再保证”。期待中美双方把战略共识和良好意愿充分转化为行动,这是两国之福、世界之福。
《 人民日报 》( 2014年07月12日 03 版)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Trump’s Solo Dream Is Over

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Austria: Trump’s Peace Is Far Away

Topics

Germany: Horror Show in Oval Office at Meeting of Merz and Trump

Hong Kong: From Harvard to West Point — The Underlying Logic of Trump’s Regulation of University Education

Spain: Trump to Students — ‘Don’t Come’

Japan: Will the Pressure on Harvard University Affect Overseas Students?

Mexico: From Star Wars to Golden Domes

Germany: US Sanctions against the EU

Austria: Whether or Not the Tariffs Are Here to Stay, the Damage Has Already Been Done*

Germany: Trump’s Tariff Policy: ‘Dealmaker’ under Pressure

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary