The highlight of the week was the news generated by the declarations, at an international level, by the presidents of the United States and Cuba.
I have no reservations about their merits. Any agreement to put an end to an overly protracted conflict over time can be described as a positive one. However, there are some issues that are not clear for the general public, although the protagonists must have achieved something beyond what we know.
For now, the Cuban people, including those in exile, should benefit from the normalization of diplomatic relations, but on the basis of truth. The "embargo" is not responsible for the failure of the Communist revolution. A system that impoverished the nation to unimaginable limits has been destroyed, but it continues on the basis of fear, violence and repression. The Castro government will now have the challenge, without giving up its understated "principles,” of opening the way to freedom and democratic life.
With this negotiation, the United States loses nothing. Cuba stopped being a threat many years ago, although it maintains control over a bankrupt and devastated Venezuela that no longer serves as a key financier. With the disappearance of the Soviet Union and the devaluation of Venezuela’s support, the Castros pragmatically look to the United States and Canada, on the one hand, and the European Union on the other.
They are right to do so. We wait to find out what agreements the dictatorship accepts in order to guarantee its survival.
But I reject the words of President Barack Obama when he speaks of correcting the "mistakes" of more than 50 years of that regime. It is an insane notion. He is ignoring contemporary history and the records of his predecessors, such as Kennedy and Johnson.
He is forgetting the missile crisis, the Soviet bases on the island, the guerrilla and terrorist adventures of Cuba in Africa, Venezuela, Colombia and Bolivia, to name but a few. That has ended. The weak Havana-Caracas axis remains, teetering on the brink thanks to the corrupt inefficiency of the Venezuelan regime. The poor old thing.
Lo más resaltante de la semana ha sido la noticia generada por las declaraciones, de impacto mundial, de los presidentes de Estados Unidos y de Cuba.
No tengo reservas sobre el fondo. Calificamos como positivo cualquier acuerdo para ponerle punto final a un conflicto demasiado prolongado en el tiempo. Sin embargo, hay algunas cuestiones que no están claras para el gran público, aunque los protagonistas deben haber concretado algo más allá de lo que conocemos.
Por ahora el pueblo cubano, incluido el exilio, debe beneficiarse por la normalización de las relaciones diplomáticas, pero sobre la base de la verdad. El “embargo” no es responsable del fracaso de la revolución comunista.
Se hunde un sistema que empobreció hasta límites inconcebibles a la nación. Pero se mantiene sobre la base del temor, de la violencia y la represión. El gobierno castrista tendrá ahora el reto de, sin renunciar a sus relativizados “principios”, iniciar una apertura hacia la libertad y la vida en democracia.
Estados Unidos no pierde nada con esta negociación. Cuba dejó de ser una amenaza hace muchos años, aunque mantenga control sobre una Venezuela en quiebra y desolación que ya no le sirve como financista fundamental. Desaparecida la Unión Soviética y devaluada Venezuela como soporte, pragmáticamente los Castro buscan a Estados Unidos y Canadá, por una parte y por la otra a la Unión Europea.
Tienen derecho a hacerlo. Esperamos saber cuáles compromisos asume la dictadura para garantizar la sobrevivencia.
Pero rechazo las palabras del presidente Barak Obama cuando habla de corregir los “errores” de más de 50 años de ese régimen. Grave desvarío. Desconoce la historia contemporánea y las ejecutorias de antecesores como Kennedy y Johnson.
Olvida la crisis de los misiles, las bases soviéticas en la isla, las aventuras guerrilleras y terroristas de Cuba en África, en Venezuela, en Colombia y en Bolivia para solo mencionar algunas. Eso se acabó. Queda el debilitado eje La Habana-Caracas. El cual se tambalea gracias a la corrupta ineficiencia del régimen venezolano. Pobre Maduro.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
No “mistakes”? Let’s start with the attempted invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs in 1961. That was a whopper. And how about the foolish assassination attempts on Castro? The whole embargo and the way it was handled wasn’t such a great idea. The prison at Guantanamo Bay? Worse than foolish. How about how the rest of Latin America had turned away from American leadership due to our Cuba policy? Don’t get me wrong, Cuban leadership under the Castro dictatorship has been a disaster and a humiliation for the Cuban people, but “better to light a candle than to curse the darkness”.
No “mistakes”? Let’s start with the attempted invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs in 1961. That was a whopper. And how about the foolish assassination attempts on Castro? The whole embargo and the way it was handled wasn’t such a great idea. The prison at Guantanamo Bay? Worse than foolish. How about how the rest of Latin America had turned away from American leadership due to our Cuba policy? Don’t get me wrong, Cuban leadership under the Castro dictatorship has been a disaster and a humiliation for the Cuban people, but “better to light a candle than to curse the darkness”.